Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustice Clarence Thomas rehabilitates an eyewitness who may not have seen anything.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2012/01/clarence_thomas_in_juan_smith_eyewitness_dissent_after_another_harry_connick_sr_case.htmlSee No Evil
A single witness linked Juan Smith to the five murders for which he was convicted in New Orleans in 1995. The Supreme Court reversed Smiths conviction yesterday, dwelling on that single witness in the 8-1 opinion it handed down. The justices had been incredulous at oral arguments at the conduct of New Orleans prosecutors. So it was an easy case, decided early in the season, with seven justices joining Chief Justice Roberts short and sweet three-and-a-half page opinion. But sometimes it is the easy decision that disguises insidious problems. The head prosecutor in New Orleans at the time, Harry Connick Sr., was nowhere to be found in the courts opinion.
Before we get to him however, it is noteworthy that the court nowhere called the single witness who identified the culprit in this case the single eyewitness. Was he even really an eyewitness? At trial, the witness said he saw the attacker face to face and was sure Smith was the one. He said he had [n]o doubt. That sure sounds like the testimony of an eyewitness.
Everything in this case hinged on that single witness. The police explained that [a]s amazing as it may seem, no fingerprints matching Smith were found. And jurors place great stock in the testimony of a confident eyewitness. This was a terrible mass murder, where men stormed into an apartment, demanded money and marijuana, told everyone inside to lie on the floor, then shot five people. Smith was sentenced to life without parole.
The problems in the case emerged only during state habeas proceedings. Thats when Smith obtained for the first time notes from the detective stating that the eyewitness said on the night of the murder that he could not ... supply a description of the perpetrators other then [sic] they were black males. Again, five days after the crime, the ostensible eyewitness said he could not ID anyone because [he] couldnt see faces and would not know them if [he] saw them. The detective wrote these statements downand then wrote down Could not ID. Its understandable that the eyewitness was, as he later said, too scared to look at anybody under the circumstances. But usually police know that a person who didnt see a face is not an eyewitness at all.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 856 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Clarence Thomas rehabilitates an eyewitness who may not have seen anything. (Original Post)
xchrom
Jan 2012
OP
Those that create evidence that doesn't exist should be fired and sent to prison for life.
LiberalFighter
Jan 2012
#1
LiberalFighter
(50,938 posts)1. Those that create evidence that doesn't exist should be fired and sent to prison for life.
I get sick of these damn prosecutors that will do anything for the sake of increasing their conviction rate.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)2. Thomas is an abomination to the entire legal profession
MrCoffee
(24,159 posts)3. Thomas despises Brady
Always has.