Let them keep calling it for Romney, and telling their sheep that he is so far up in the polls, that most of them will think Romney doesn't even need their vote to win.

union_maid

(3,502 posts)

17. My thoughts exactly

Reply to BarKim (Reply #10)

Tue Oct 23, 2012, 07:02 PM

Oct 2012

They can just curl up with a few sixpacks and watch something else on tv that night. To hell with voting.

MFM008

(19,820 posts)

12. they did that in 2010

Reply to brettdale (Original post)

Tue Oct 23, 2012, 06:59 PM

Oct 2012

Care Acutely

(1,370 posts)

13. The day after his last election. So what else ya got?

Reply to brettdale (Original post)

Tue Oct 23, 2012, 07:00 PM

Oct 2012

Because this is meaningless. Utterly.

Mass

(27,315 posts)

14. Obviously. Which is why they need to manipulate Intrade!

Reply to brettdale (Original post)

Tue Oct 23, 2012, 07:00 PM

Oct 2012

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021617392

Update: Via Marginal Revolution: for about $1,250 it is evidently possible to manipulate InTrade. This morning’s swing toward Romney was caused by one trader’s manipulation. Ro-mentum!!

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)

18. at 10am, one person bought $17,800 worth of Romney shares

Reply to Mass (Reply #14)

Tue Oct 23, 2012, 07:05 PM

Oct 2012

See comment #26 here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251168683#post26

madokie

(51,076 posts)

15. They did that 6 years ago so this isn't new news by any stretch

Reply to brettdale (Original post)

Tue Oct 23, 2012, 07:01 PM

Oct 2012

fuck fox noise and the kangaroo they rode in on

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)

16. Good. Now their low information viewers will think the election is over and they won't vote :)

Reply to brettdale (Original post)

Tue Oct 23, 2012, 07:01 PM

Oct 2012

ProSense

(116,464 posts)

19. That's OK. Reuters:

Reply to brettdale (Original post)

Tue Oct 23, 2012, 07:08 PM

Oct 2012

<...>

Obama maintains a larger advantage in the state-by-state battle that will determine the outcome of the election. Ipsos projects that Obama holds an edge in the most hotly contested states, including Florida, Virginia and Ohio, and is likely to win by a relatively comfortable margin of 332 electoral votes to 206 electoral votes.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/23/us-usa-campaign-poll-idUSBRE89K0A920121023

Initech

(100,104 posts)

20. Fox News: the pro establishment network that thinks it's anti establishment.

Reply to brettdale (Original post)

Tue Oct 23, 2012, 07:24 PM

Oct 2012

Or as Jon Stewart calls it "Bullshit Mountain."

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)

21. Did they mention the alien invasion or the super nova of our sun?

Reply to brettdale (Original post)

Tue Oct 23, 2012, 07:53 PM

Oct 2012

Blue Owl

(50,507 posts)

22. Because his family invests in swing-state voting machines?

Reply to brettdale (Original post)

Tue Oct 23, 2012, 08:06 PM

Oct 2012

Make that PAPERLESS NON-VERIFIABLE voting machines approved by CHUCK TODD as fail safe?

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)

23. baka! baka! baka! baka! baka! baka! baka! baka! baka! baka! baka! baka!

Reply to brettdale (Original post)

Tue Oct 23, 2012, 08:11 PM

Oct 2012

xfundy

(5,105 posts)

24. It simply MUST be true!

Reply to brettdale (Original post)

Tue Oct 23, 2012, 10:23 PM

Oct 2012

After all, they are FAIR and BALANCED.

Aren't they? Surely they wouldn't be trying to skew the election by telling idiots to "go vote for the winner, we just told you who it is"?

The church of Fox needs to lose its broadcast/cable license and stand prosecution for treason.