Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,092 posts)
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 06:25 PM Oct 2012

Prospects brighten for filibuster reform

Prospects brighten for filibuster reform
By Greg Sargent


Here’s another reason to be cautiously optimistic about the way the political winds are blowing: With Dems seemingly on track to hang on to the Senate — and with Obama’s electoral edge perhaps holding — the prospects are brightening for an overhaul of the filibuster.

Senator Jeff Merkley, the co-author of a package of filibuster reforms, has secured commitments from nine leading Dem Senate candidates to throw themselves behind fixing the filibuster if they are elected.

Merkley is circulating an email raising money for the nine Senators, who include Elizabeth Warren, Tammy Baldwin, Martin Heinrich, Tim Kaine and Heidi Heitkamp. “These nine candidates running for the Senate right now have committed to helping me fix the broken Senate by reforming the filibuster,” the email says.

If Dems do hold the Senate, we could be looking at a more progressive Democratic caucus next year, thanks to this year’s crop of unexpectedly solid progressive candidates. This could result in more pressure on the Dem leadership to actually go through with reform.

Merkley is calling for reforms that, among other things, would force the filibustering party to play a much more public role in obstructing the majority — perhaps making it politically less appetizing. The Senate has already adopted one proposed reform, the elimination of the secret hold.

more...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/prospects-brighten-for-filibuster-reform/2012/10/31/a1ceead0-238b-11e2-ac85-e669876c6a24_blog.html

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Prospects brighten for filibuster reform (Original Post) babylonsister Oct 2012 OP
I know a common reply to this mick063 Oct 2012 #1
Let's hope we retake the House and get some work done. LonePirate Oct 2012 #2
I don't know about the House, but I feel confident about the Senate. nt babylonsister Oct 2012 #3
Just get rid of it musiclawyer Oct 2012 #4
They have to or it will be gridlock. Guaranteed. AtomicKitten Oct 2012 #5
Hey you! babylonsister Oct 2012 #8
I did vote. I voted for the one that takes O-H-I-O. AtomicKitten Oct 2012 #9
Bwhahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! babylonsister Oct 2012 #10
cheers AtomicKitten Oct 2012 #11
This is good news. n/t dmr Oct 2012 #6
I'm glad we elected Merkley in Oregon davidpdx Oct 2012 #7
 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
1. I know a common reply to this
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 06:37 PM
Oct 2012

would be that it does not resolve the Tea Party House but in fact it does.

If not for filibuster, the House would own every crazy budget proposal, every give away to the rich, and every obstruction to the president.

As it stands now, all of Congress, including the Democratic majority in the Senate, share the "do nothing" label. They equally share in reinforcing the perception that the President can't work with Congress.

Fixing filibuster abuse will put the blame squarely on the House as they are continuously faced with straight "up/down" votes that run contrary to both the President and the Senate.

The result?

The House gets.that 10% approval rating as opposed to all of Congress.

LonePirate

(13,431 posts)
2. Let's hope we retake the House and get some work done.
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 06:43 PM
Oct 2012

We have a backlog of progressive legislation we need passed.

musiclawyer

(2,335 posts)
4. Just get rid of it
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 06:53 PM
Oct 2012

And none of this " we will one day be in the minority" nonsense

The modern GOP will get rid of it when they return to power Us doing it first adds on at least two or three senate cycles of them being out of power, because we will be able to get things done once we get back the House. That's just a matter of time

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Prospects brighten for fi...