Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 03:55 PM Nov 2012

Summing up Nate Silver's Closing Argument

If the polls are as reliable as polls usually are then Obama cannot plausibly lose. There is no ambiguity in what the polls say.

The only way Romney can win is if what the polls are unambiguously saying is false... if the polls are systemically biased against Romney.

This is a fine distinction, but an important one.

Again, the level of error in individual polls is not enough for Romney to have any chance of winning.

His only chance is if the "un-skew" crowd (who should be called "poll truthers&quot is right and polls in general, everywhere, are defective, showing less support for Romney than he actually has.

Anyone, anywhere who thinks Romney has a chance is making an affirmative prediction that the polls are categorically wrong. That is possible, but unlikely.

If you take the polls at face value, then the popular vote might be a tossup, but the Electoral College favors Mr. Obama.

So you have to make some case for why the polls shouldn’t be taken at face value.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Summing up Nate Silver's ...