General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA year ago, virtually all the pundits said we'd lose the Senate
Thanks in large part to the tea idiots, we're almost sure to keep it. We had way, way more seats up than the repubs but the tea party madness fucked them but good. They voted out Lugar who certainly would have won. They voted in Akin who's almost guaranteed to lose.
If the President wins on Tuesday and we hold the Senate, the war in repuke party will be epic. and fun to watch.
Iggy
(1,418 posts)then WHY is nothing significant getting done in DC??
cali
(114,904 posts)Dems don't actually control the Senate-- a two or three seat majority means nothing
I suspect we're forgetting the blue dogs.. who may as well just joing the repug party; when if ever do they support any sort of progressive legislation?
cali
(114,904 posts)it means that its difficult to push through an agenda. And most blue dogs- not all- have been replaced by repugs over the last few cycles. It also means that the Senate Majority Leader is a dem and that's very important. Look at who heads up Senate Committees.
ywcachieve
(365 posts)Last edited Mon Nov 5, 2012, 05:10 AM - Edit history (1)
Things have to get past the House first, and the House Repubs have made that almost impossible.
savebigbird
(417 posts)They sure do know how to make the entire legislature look bad with their stalling and "make Obama a one-term president" mentality (the conservatives, anyway).