General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPath to Victory: Wisconsin, Ohio, Nevada, Iowa – Early Voting and Polls Suggest Clear Obama Victory
As the last weekend before Election Days draws to a close, President Obama is tightening his grip on an electoral college victory. Of the nine states that are considered competitive at this time (Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia, Wisconsin), Obama seems to be pulling away in four of them (Iowa, Ohio, Nevada, Wisconsin) with more than enough electoral votes to win. Of the other 5 competitive states, Obama has a slight lead in one (NH), two are virtually tied (CO, VA), and Romney has a slight lead in one (FL) and a somewhat comfortable lead in one (NC). But Obama doesnt need any of those 5 states to win. Iowa, Ohio, Nevada and Wisconsin alone will give him 277 electoral votes, to 261 for Romney. In fact, Obama could even lose Iowa or Nevada, in addition to the other 5, and he would still win.
Recent polling in Nevada, Ohio, Iowa, and Wisconsin
First lets consider the polling. Obama leads in a series of recent polls in the 4 states, as compiled by Real Clear Politics, ranging from 2.8% to 4.2%, as follows:
Nevada: 5 polls, [font color="blue"]+ 2.8%[/font]
Ohio: 12 polls, [font color="blue"]+ 2.8%[/font]
Iowa: 6 polls, [font color="blue"]+ 3.0%[/font]
Wisconsin, 5 polls, + [font color="blue"]4.2%[/font]
Those leads may not seem like a great deal. But keep in mind that the statistical margin of error in combined polls is far lower than that from a single poll. All of those Obama leads are above the statistical margin of error, with only two days to go.
Nate Silver recently looked at the historical accuracy of state polls right before Election Day, since 1988. Of 77 series of late state polls since 1988, 74 of them correctly predicted the winner. One of the ones that didnt was the series of Ohio state polls right before the 2004 election and as we now know, there is a great amount of evidence that that election was riddled with fraud. The latest pre-election polls in Ohio in 2004 predicted John Kerry the winner, while George W. Bush won the official vote count. Not incidentally, the Ohio exit polls also predicted John Kerry the winner by a large margin.
Early voting
An analysis of early voting provides additional strong reason to believe that Obama will win these 4 states:
Nevada
72% of Nevadans have already voted (if one assumes that total turnout will approximately equal that of 2008), and analysis of voting by party affiliation shows that more than 48 thousand registered Democrats than Republicans have voted so far. Of course Party affiliation does not prove who one is going to vote for. But extrapolation from similar early voting data in Nevada in 2008 indicates that Obama has a comfortable lead in Nevada at this point.
Iowa
With 39% of Iowans having voted by now, the lead in registered Democrats over Republicans is about 63 thousand. Again, extrapolation from early voting data in 2008 indicates a comfortable lead for Obama.
Ohio
In Ohio, only about 29% of voters have early voted so far. Early voting in Ohio is not tabulated by Party affiliation. But the two most highly Democratic counties in the state (Cuyahoga and Franklin) have early voted so far by much higher rates (36% and 37% of the total 2008 voter turnout) than the rest of the state, which is mostly Republican (21%). This is similar to early voting rate patterns by county observed in 2008 in Ohio, when Obama won by a comfortable margin.
Wisconsin
Not much early voting has occurred in Wisconsin. But since Wisconsin is one of the very few states in the country that has same day voter registration, typical polls of likely voters are likely to underestimate the Obama lead in Wisconsin. Added to the comfortable and growing Obama lead of 4.2% in Wisconsin, that should translate into an Obama victory in Wisconsin.
In summary
Late polling data in Wisconsin, Iowa, Ohio, and Nevada, in addition to analysis of early voting in Iowa, Ohio, and Nevada, shows a strong likelihood of a comfortable Obama win in each of those states, which together provide more than enough electoral votes to win the presidency, when added to those the 20 non-competitive, safe Obama states.
Therefore, if the official vote count should show a Romney victory on Election Day, intensive investigations, including a review of exit polls, carefully observed recounts and forensic examinations of electronic voting machines, should be demanded prior to an Obama concession.
KaryninMiami
(3,073 posts)Another post that moves me off the ledge- that's a very good thing!
michello
(132 posts)Jonathan Alter was on there saying that Romney has a strong ground game in Ohio and that it's going to come down to the wire. Also, Ed was saying how the suppression in Ohio is so well organized that we(the Dems)are down 12,000 votes. They were saying that its going to be a hugh mess in Ohio. It's going to be a mess.
Time for change
(13,718 posts)It should have been thoroughly investigated before the results were allowed to stand.
michello
(132 posts)I just hope that they don't let this guy get away with this.
But gotta call bs on that one. What evidence does Ed site for dems being down by 12,000 votes when Ohio doesn't report party Id? Every poll taken has us winning early vote 60-40 and turnout in dem strongholds is matching 2008 levels. Just sounds like run of the mill concern trolling to me.
Time for change
(13,718 posts)a reasonably comfortable lead and when early voting is disproportionately high in highly Democratic counties. Furhtermore, current polling involves many people who have already voted, which currently consists of almost 30% of the expected voter turnout for this year.
Cha
(297,689 posts)I've read of too many disingenuous mediawhore pandering that he's done over these last months.
Did they mention that the Obama Team has over 2,000 Lawyers on the ground, too? Ready to fight Voter Suppression?
DemReadingDU
(16,000 posts)it feels like the fix is in for Rmoney
Time for change
(13,718 posts)It's going to be difficult to do that without leaving fingerprints.
The Obama team needs to be ready to challenge the results. If they intend to just roll over and accept whatever results are presented to them, so as not to cause waves, that would be a great mistake IMO.