General Discussion

charlyvi

(6,537 posts) Mon Nov 5, 2012, 10:37 PM Nov 2012

Mitt. Please, SHUT YOUR PIE HOLE!

Or your caviar hole. Or your quiche hole. Or whatever the hell you shove in your face which, by the way, has a sum total of two expressions, neither of which resemble a human being in any way.

If I was a die-hard Republican, I swear I'd vote for O just to keep from listening to your mincing, condescending tone of voice for four years. Please, please, put a lid on it.

Whew. I feel better now.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mitt. Please, SHUT YOUR PIE HOLE! (Original Post) charlyvi Nov 2012 OP

I just want to hear him once more. In a concession speech. nolabear Nov 2012 #1

He'll probably send his cabin boy running mate to do the dirty work. TheCowsCameHome Nov 2012 #3

he will soon be gone.... spanone Nov 2012 #2

Pi is nominally 3.14159... mindwalker_i Nov 2012 #4

nolabear

(41,986 posts)

1. I just want to hear him once more. In a concession speech.

Reply to charlyvi (Original post)

Mon Nov 5, 2012, 10:41 PM

Nov 2012

Then he can STFU forever.

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)

3. He'll probably send his cabin boy running mate to do the dirty work.

Reply to nolabear (Reply #1)

Mon Nov 5, 2012, 10:45 PM

Nov 2012

You know, Paul Cryan.

spanone

(135,844 posts)

2. he will soon be gone....

Reply to charlyvi (Original post)

Mon Nov 5, 2012, 10:41 PM

Nov 2012

mindwalker_i

(4,407 posts)

4. Pi is nominally 3.14159...

Reply to charlyvi (Original post)

Mon Nov 5, 2012, 11:08 PM

Nov 2012

However, if you were to take Mitt and set him spinning on the axis of his pie hole, it would be subject to special relativity. We need to get him rotating around his pie hole fast enough that his lips, which will be tangential to the direction of motion, will shrink due to Lorentz contraction. In the limit as the rotational tangential velocity of Mitt's pie hole approaches the speed of light, the circumference of said pie hole will approach zero.

That would be a fitting end to Mitt and his campaign.

Reply to this discussion