Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,996 posts)
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 09:53 AM Nov 2012

NATE SILVER: 的f pundits were on the ballot against, like, I don稚 know, Ebola, I might vote Ebola"



New York Times polling guru Nate Silver told Stephen Colbert on Monday just what he thinks of political pundits. More than a few commentators have attacked Silver’s FiveThirtyEight election forecast for giving President Obama high odds in the lead-up to Election Day.

“I’m not very pro-pundit, I have to say” Silver said. “If pundits were on the ballot against, like, I don’t know, Ebola, I might vote Ebola, or third party.”

MSNBC host Joe Scarborough called Silver out recently over his election forecast, which currently places the odds of an Obama victory at around 90 percent. The FiveThirtyEight model, Silver said, is “not really that complicated, but people treat it like it’s Galileo or something, something totally heretical.”

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/nate-silver-colbert-report-pundits.php?ref=fpnewsfeed
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NATE SILVER: 的f pundits were on the ballot against, like, I don稚 know, Ebola, I might vote Ebola" (Original Post) kpete Nov 2012 OP
Love him for sure now. :) n/t OneGrassRoot Nov 2012 #1
beautifully put. n/t Whisp Nov 2012 #2
I'm a polling skeptic Anthony McCarthy Nov 2012 #3
They have a product to sell. Barack_America Nov 2012 #7
He seems pretty sure of the outcome doesn't he, the meme yesterday from the MSM doc03 Nov 2012 #4
Ebola's cool. barnabas63 Nov 2012 #5
Ebola is effective and elegant (as viruses go). Barack_America Nov 2012 #6
Heh heh. Chorophyll Nov 2012 #8
where was all this right wing criticism in 2010 central scrutinizer Nov 2012 #9
Nate hits the nail on the head here. Bluenorthwest Nov 2012 #10
Math has a left wing bias! yellowcanine Nov 2012 #11
Pundits inflict massive suffering intentionally; the Ebola virus does not carolinayellowdog Nov 2012 #12

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
7. They have a product to sell.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 10:12 AM
Nov 2012

It's not about information or knowledge or anything worthwhile. Their goal is to keep you watching.

central scrutinizer

(11,652 posts)
9. where was all this right wing criticism in 2010
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 10:16 AM
Nov 2012

when Silver correctly predicted the outcome of the House and Senate races and the success of the tea-anderthals?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
10. Nate hits the nail on the head here.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 10:18 AM
Nov 2012

Punditry is a worthless field. It is nothing but improvisational chatter, based on nothing.

carolinayellowdog

(3,247 posts)
12. Pundits inflict massive suffering intentionally; the Ebola virus does not
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 11:07 AM
Nov 2012

They have been willfully ramping up anxiety and anger in the populace for several months.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NATE SILVER: 的f pundits ...