Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CNN~ 2nd machine in PA found (Original Post) pkz Nov 2012 OP
Well damn, how many people voted on this shit? nm nc4bo Nov 2012 #1
Our whole election has been corrupted! KansDem Nov 2012 #4
So is KKKarl femrap Nov 2012 #13
Do we have a fraud reporting line? tavalon Nov 2012 #2
I would like to know... dajoki Nov 2012 #53
Funny how these glitchy machines never seem to flip votes the other way. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2012 #3
Without fail. They ALWAYS flip to republican. How does that happen? loudsue Nov 2012 #7
They never ever ever ever LondonReign2 Nov 2012 #48
I remember a news article Name Unpronounceable Nov 2012 #54
Idiot Trump even claims it in a tweet and says there's a "pattern" of votes flipped to Obama. nt tblue37 Nov 2012 #73
Yup Cali_Democrat Nov 2012 #8
+1 closeupready Nov 2012 #12
Jail. Someone better go to jail. zonkers Nov 2012 #19
Follow the money to the machines--are the machine makers Repig supporters? Supersedeas Nov 2012 #28
Yes they are. Google Stephen Spoonamore, he is a computer expert that testified in the Ohio Dustlawyer Nov 2012 #50
They find it after how many hours of voting? Democratopia Nov 2012 #5
The software can be set to flip after a certain time and date formercia Nov 2012 #47
2 machines...2 different counties pkz Nov 2012 #6
So, can it be flipped back? It's at least good they're noticing it, right? Cha Nov 2012 #9
For 2016, I am going to assemble a going to the polls kit left is right Nov 2012 #10
What do we want........election reform....when do we want it.....NOW! louslobbs Nov 2012 #11
+1 nt ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #41
Whoever's responsible for checking these machines needs to be held accountable. lpbk2713 Nov 2012 #14
Please provide a link, news site, anything. Otherwise... you are just stirring the pot. TalkingDog Nov 2012 #15
Ali Velshi live in PA on CNN pkz Nov 2012 #23
Thank you. You can never be underinformed. TalkingDog Nov 2012 #31
I've searched his Twitter feed and there is NO report of a 2nd machine. TalkingDog Nov 2012 #39
It was shown flipping on the Chris Matthews Show/Hardball five minutes ago. WinkyDink Nov 2012 #34
The original machine or the "2nd" machine? TalkingDog Nov 2012 #42
that was the original machine riverwalker Nov 2012 #52
How many people voted on it before it was noticed? StarryNite Nov 2012 #16
Video of this happening - in case someone missed it: Ruby the Liberal Nov 2012 #17
+1 nt ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #44
As unlikely as it is.... Bladian Nov 2012 #18
It would be far, FAR simpler to manipulate the numbers without updating the screen. randome Nov 2012 #20
We want to believe that Election Fraud is something the voter can detect if we're alert.... Junkdrawer Nov 2012 #22
I'd prefer it was that way, too. randome Nov 2012 #25
no, you are right argiel1234 Nov 2012 #45
You don't understand. It's not carelessness. randome Nov 2012 #55
oh its very much carelessness, even repuke software designers suck argiel1234 Nov 2012 #58
It's a touch screen sensor malfunction. That's the most obvious conclusion to draw. randome Nov 2012 #59
I think you may not understand programming. For a programmer to 'accidentally' Flatulo Nov 2012 #62
I program in C++ argiel1234 Nov 2012 #63
Then you should know that what Flatulo said is right. randome Nov 2012 #67
unfortunately this wont be drawn into a IT conversation argiel1234 Nov 2012 #69
I'm NOT fine with it. Neither am I fine with jumping to conclusions. randome Nov 2012 #70
Mitt Romneys son owns financial stakes in a electronic voting machine company argiel1234 Nov 2012 #71
"It would be like shaking a box of bolts and expecting a toaster to come out fully assembled. It jus mindwalker_i Nov 2012 #64
He does kind of seem to be made up out of spare parts, doesn't he. lol. Flatulo Nov 2012 #68
Spare parts somewhat randomly arranged mindwalker_i Nov 2012 #72
Never discount the possibility of half-assed software. n/t gkhouston Nov 2012 #38
To Me, YOU ARE Much Too Trusting! ChiciB1 Nov 2012 #40
Of course it would. randome Nov 2012 #56
Interesting how it's ALWAYS for the Republican candidate Clyde39 Nov 2012 #21
Except that it isn't always for the Republican candidate, and it doesn't always make sense slackmaster Nov 2012 #57
Find out where and tweet Rachel Maddow - she'll track it KatyBR Nov 2012 #24
Do Rachel a favor. randome Nov 2012 #27
third world shit ecstatic Nov 2012 #26
Democracy American Style...lets spread it around the world. nt NorthCarolina Nov 2012 #29
This is no accident TinCup Nov 2012 #30
How do you know that? Vattel Nov 2012 #33
Get serious. WinkyDink Nov 2012 #36
What I'd like to know is... Hubert Flottz Nov 2012 #32
I Don't Want To SEE A Video Of It Happening... ChiciB1 Nov 2012 #35
Republicans are out to steal America Berlum Nov 2012 #37
The Republicans own these machines argiel1234 Nov 2012 #43
These Machines Need To Be Quaranteed DallasNE Nov 2012 #46
FBI should confiscate NOW. mainer Nov 2012 #49
2004 was no accident. nt valerief Nov 2012 #51
I'm an IT guy.... smccarter Nov 2012 #60
Paper voting slips in Los Angeles, as always, with a machine to check for "half" markings Fire Walk With Me Nov 2012 #61
Voter regulation reform!!! dem4ward Nov 2012 #65
So has the machine been shut down and sequestered? lonestarnot Nov 2012 #66

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
4. Our whole election has been corrupted!
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:22 PM
Nov 2012

Just shout the f**king thing down now and let's start over with paper ballots counted with observers present...

 

femrap

(13,418 posts)
13. So is KKKarl
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:28 PM
Nov 2012

setting up the 'steal' in PA. Remember when RobMe went back there and everyone was WTF????

PA is a strange state. Pollsters say it's 2 big cities on each side (Philly and Pittsburgh) and very 'Southern Red' in the middle...but there aren't that many in the middle.

dajoki

(10,678 posts)
53. I would like to know...
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 07:38 PM
Nov 2012

that number also. My 86 year old aunt tried to vote for Bob Casey and it kept flipping to Tom Smith. She even had one of the poll workers try it and the same thing happened. Nobody there knew what to do, that is a shame, she did not get to vote in that race.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
7. Without fail. They ALWAYS flip to republican. How does that happen?
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:22 PM
Nov 2012

Because republicans have to cheat to win.

LondonReign2

(5,213 posts)
48. They never ever ever ever
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 07:21 PM
Nov 2012

ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever eve rever ever eve rever ever eve rever ever ever flip the other way, do they?

So please people, don't tell me I'm being paranoid

54. I remember a news article
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 07:39 PM
Nov 2012

from a few weeks ago regarding an early voter who claimed her Romney vote was flipped to Obama. The programmer looked into it to recalibrate the machine but whatever he tried, he could not find such a vote flip. But some news outfit ran with the story. I didn't believe for a second that this jackass really had any problem with her vote and just wanted to cause justification for all the "voter fraud" crap these dirtbags are trying to pull and lied from the get-go. It's truly disgusting.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
50. Yes they are. Google Stephen Spoonamore, he is a computer expert that testified in the Ohio
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 07:25 PM
Nov 2012

2004 electronic vote fraud case. What he has to say will have you in disbelief!

formercia

(18,479 posts)
47. The software can be set to flip after a certain time and date
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 07:19 PM
Nov 2012

..this way, it doesn't show up in testing unless the time and date are changed in the Bios to match the code.

..and it can be set to go back to normal after a set period as well, so if checked later on, all will appear normal.

Cha

(297,314 posts)
9. So, can it be flipped back? It's at least good they're noticing it, right?
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:23 PM
Nov 2012

Fucking Machines.. Don't see ballots doing that unless there's a crooked poll worker who's tossing them or whatever.. or a teresa la pore who designed the ballot to confuse voters.

left is right

(1,665 posts)
10. For 2016, I am going to assemble a going to the polls kit
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:26 PM
Nov 2012

A couple bottles of water and an energy snack such as granola and a blanket wrap for long lines, a fifty foot tape measure just to insure that campaign workers are following the law and most important a smart phone ready to take videos of me casting my vote just in case it flips

lpbk2713

(42,759 posts)
14. Whoever's responsible for checking these machines needs to be held accountable.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:28 PM
Nov 2012



And that would be just the start. Follow the trail as far as it will lead.


pkz

(719 posts)
23. Ali Velshi live in PA on CNN
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:38 PM
Nov 2012

anyone that follows him on Twitter can snag it, he said it live on CNN

Not stirring the pot!

TalkingDog

(9,001 posts)
39. I've searched his Twitter feed and there is NO report of a 2nd machine.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 07:05 PM
Nov 2012

Could you copy that particular tweet and post it here?

StarryNite

(9,446 posts)
16. How many people voted on it before it was noticed?
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:29 PM
Nov 2012

How many machines would have to be tweaked to flip the vote to change the outcome of the election in a tight race?

This fucking sucks!

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
17. Video of this happening - in case someone missed it:
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:30 PM
Nov 2012

NPR is linking to this, somewhere in PA:

&feature=plcp

Bladian

(475 posts)
18. As unlikely as it is....
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:30 PM
Nov 2012

I'm hoping this is a fluke. This is TOO overt, in my opinion, to be voter fraud. If they were going to fuck up the system they'd make it so you thought it was okay, but behind the scenes it was FUBAR. Not so the voter could clearly see it was wrong.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
20. It would be far, FAR simpler to manipulate the numbers without updating the screen.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:31 PM
Nov 2012

In fact, a program would need to go OUT OF ITS WAY to update the screen instead of just the numbers.

I know it's somehow 'exciting' to think that this is coordinated election fraud but it most likely is not.

A couple of malfunctioning machines is not enough to sway this election. Perhaps more will be found but it would have been noticed if it was more widespread than this.

Most likely the touch sensors behind he screen are malfunctioning or placed incorrectly or something.

Junkdrawer

(27,993 posts)
22. We want to believe that Election Fraud is something the voter can detect if we're alert....
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:36 PM
Nov 2012

Unless you have VVPATs and audits, you can't.

Unless you open the tabulating software to scrutiny, you can't.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
25. I'd prefer it was that way, too.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:40 PM
Nov 2012

But this specific instance appears to be a machine malfunction, not some clumsy attempt to sway some votes.

Republicans are stupid but they're not THIS stupid.

 

argiel1234

(390 posts)
45. no, you are right
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 07:15 PM
Nov 2012

they are not this stupid. They were careless on a couple of the electronic voting machines, hence the visual discrepancy.

oh, and electronic voting needs to be made illegal

no one is buying the bullshit anymore.

NO ONE

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
55. You don't understand. It's not carelessness.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 07:49 PM
Nov 2012

The program would have to deliberately update the screen to reflect the changed vote. That's not 'carelessness'.

Ergo, the most likely explanation is faulty touch screen sensors.

 

argiel1234

(390 posts)
58. oh its very much carelessness, even repuke software designers suck
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 07:56 PM
Nov 2012

Interesting that you seem to be ok with electronic touch screen voting

actually it isnt after reading your comments

Did you know that Mitt Romneys son holds interests in a particular touch screen company?

you know the son of the guy who is the other candidate?




Like I said no one is buying the bullshit anymore

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
59. It's a touch screen sensor malfunction. That's the most obvious conclusion to draw.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 08:00 PM
Nov 2012

I'm aware of all you said but I still say that doesn't explain why 2 machines out of how many tens of thousands malfunctioned this way.

It doesn't have to be bullshit to look at the facts dispassionately.

 

Flatulo

(5,005 posts)
62. I think you may not understand programming. For a programmer to 'accidentally'
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 08:15 PM
Nov 2012

screw up his malicious code so that the screen displayed the vote flip would required lots of extra lines of code, not simply typos. When code has typos or simple errors in it, it just does not run.

It would be like shaking a box of bolts and expecting a toaster to come out fully assembled. It just doesn't happen.

It would indeed be far, far easier to flip the vote in the background so the voter would have absolutely no reason for concern.

Sorry, but your post just comes across as uneducated and irrational.

And no, I do not support electronic machines with no paper trail. Fortunately I got to vote on a paper ballot that is read by an optical scanner, but is available for human review if a recount is called for.

 

argiel1234

(390 posts)
63. I program in C++
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 08:20 PM
Nov 2012

and worked debugging software for MRI machines in a previous job

when did i say typos? lol




Oh and,

No one is buying the bullshit anymore

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
67. Then you should know that what Flatulo said is right.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 08:57 PM
Nov 2012

Deliberate coding is needed to update the screen. That would not be carelessness. That would be a deliberate attempt to show the user that their vote is being changed, which kind of invalidates the idea that this is some sort of nefarious plot to 'secretly' change votes.

 

argiel1234

(390 posts)
69. unfortunately this wont be drawn into a IT conversation
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 09:09 PM
Nov 2012

Get rid of illegal electronic voting and illegal optical scanning garbage machines.

I already stated that Mitt Romney's son owns financial interests in a electronic voting company.

If you are fine with this just say so and own it

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
70. I'm NOT fine with it. Neither am I fine with jumping to conclusions.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 09:11 PM
Nov 2012

I won't run around with my hair on fire until someone can convince me that my hair is, indeed, aflame.

 

argiel1234

(390 posts)
71. Mitt Romneys son owns financial stakes in a electronic voting machine company
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 09:15 PM
Nov 2012

Mitt Romneys son owns financial stakes in a electronic voting machine company


Mitt Romneys son owns financial stakes in a electronic voting machine company

Mitt Romneys son owns financial stakes in a electronic voting machine company

Mitt Romneys son owns financial stakes in a electronic voting machine company


I will repeat as necessary while you light your hair on fire with your fingers in your ears singing LALALALALA

mindwalker_i

(4,407 posts)
64. "It would be like shaking a box of bolts and expecting a toaster to come out fully assembled. It jus
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 08:49 PM
Nov 2012

t doesn't happen"

Isn't that how we got Romney in the first place?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
56. Of course it would.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 07:50 PM
Nov 2012

But what are the odds that a Republican hacker would deliberately update the screen to reflect the changed vote? I'd say practically nil.

Clyde39

(1,074 posts)
21. Interesting how it's ALWAYS for the Republican candidate
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:35 PM
Nov 2012

Makes you wonder how many times this has happened and if it has changed outcomes.

KatyBR

(183 posts)
24. Find out where and tweet Rachel Maddow - she'll track it
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:39 PM
Nov 2012

Her twitter account is:
Rachel Maddow MSNBC
@maddow

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
27. Do Rachel a favor.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:42 PM
Nov 2012

And don't deluge her online accounts with something unless we have more information.

As I say above, this is much more likely to be a touch screen sensor malfunction, nothing more than that.

Hubert Flottz

(37,726 posts)
32. What I'd like to know is...
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 07:02 PM
Nov 2012

Were republicans the county officials in charge of elections in these counties? Does PA have a republican SoS?

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
35. I Don't Want To SEE A Video Of It Happening...
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 07:04 PM
Nov 2012

I want to KNOW what can be done??? I DO NOT TRUST REPUKES & as I said on another thread, I believe it's TAG who bought into ESS&S machines in Ohio!

How do we know that there aren't Romney surrogates screwing things up too?? I can't take this stuff again!

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
46. These Machines Need To Be Quaranteed
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 07:16 PM
Nov 2012

And sent to a lab for testing. Since there is a potential crime here I don't believe that proprietary software rules apply. These things can be reversed engineered so answers can be found. It is long past time to get to the bottom of this. If it leads to corporate headquarters, so be it.

smccarter

(145 posts)
60. I'm an IT guy....
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 08:00 PM
Nov 2012

This could be as simple as the terminal needs to be recalibrated.

Having said that, I wouldn't cast my vote on a machine that doesn't register the correct vote. I would hope to think that noone else would either. If you select one candidate and it registers a vote for a different candidate.... take 2 steps back and ask to have the terminal removed as it is NOT registering the correct vote. Ask to be allowed to cast your vote on a different terminal and cast your vote there. If it also registers incorrectly, go back a couple of steps and start the process over.

If you're asked to provide a photo ID, provide a photo ID. If you're told months ahead of time that you're going to need a photo ID to vote, go get a photo ID.

I agree that there are problems, that several claims seem realistic and even suspicious. The idea that anyone associated with Mitt Romney owns any portion of any company that manufactures and provides voting machines to any state during a presidential election is definitely a question of ethics. But let's be serious here, we all have a responsibility to make sure that we don't cast a vote for the wrong candidate just because we're not prepared to step back, bring the issue to the attention of an official and ask to cast our vote on a different machine.

I cast my vote last Wednesday for a fine man. One that needs to remain in office for 4 more years. President Obama needs to remain in office to see this recovery through. I'm baffled as to how ANYONE could vote for Mitt Romney.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
61. Paper voting slips in Los Angeles, as always, with a machine to check for "half" markings
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 08:12 PM
Nov 2012

so thankfully, none of that electronic crap out here.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CNN~ 2nd machine in PA fo...