General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCNN~ 2nd machine in PA found
hit the Obama vote and it flips to Romney
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)KansDem
(28,498 posts)Just shout the f**king thing down now and let's start over with paper ballots counted with observers present...
setting up the 'steal' in PA. Remember when RobMe went back there and everyone was WTF????
PA is a strange state. Pollsters say it's 2 big cities on each side (Philly and Pittsburgh) and very 'Southern Red' in the middle...but there aren't that many in the middle.
tavalon
(27,985 posts)dajoki
(10,678 posts)that number also. My 86 year old aunt tried to vote for Bob Casey and it kept flipping to Tom Smith. She even had one of the poll workers try it and the same thing happened. Nobody there knew what to do, that is a shame, she did not get to vote in that race.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,734 posts)loudsue
(14,087 posts)Because republicans have to cheat to win.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever eve rever ever eve rever ever eve rever ever ever flip the other way, do they?
So please people, don't tell me I'm being paranoid
Name Unpronounceable
(39 posts)from a few weeks ago regarding an early voter who claimed her Romney vote was flipped to Obama. The programmer looked into it to recalibrate the machine but whatever he tried, he could not find such a vote flip. But some news outfit ran with the story. I didn't believe for a second that this jackass really had any problem with her vote and just wanted to cause justification for all the "voter fraud" crap these dirtbags are trying to pull and lied from the get-go. It's truly disgusting.
tblue37
(65,403 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)What a coincidence.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)zonkers
(5,865 posts)Supersedeas
(20,630 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)2004 electronic vote fraud case. What he has to say will have you in disbelief!
Democratopia
(552 posts)formercia
(18,479 posts)..this way, it doesn't show up in testing unless the time and date are changed in the Bios to match the code.
..and it can be set to go back to normal after a set period as well, so if checked later on, all will appear normal.
pkz
(719 posts)Cha
(297,314 posts)Fucking Machines.. Don't see ballots doing that unless there's a crooked poll worker who's tossing them or whatever.. or a teresa la pore who designed the ballot to confuse voters.
left is right
(1,665 posts)A couple bottles of water and an energy snack such as granola and a blanket wrap for long lines, a fifty foot tape measure just to insure that campaign workers are following the law and most important a smart phone ready to take videos of me casting my vote just in case it flips
louslobbs
(3,235 posts)Lou
ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)lpbk2713
(42,759 posts)And that would be just the start. Follow the trail as far as it will lead.
TalkingDog
(9,001 posts)Thanks
pkz
(719 posts)anyone that follows him on Twitter can snag it, he said it live on CNN
Not stirring the pot!
TalkingDog
(9,001 posts)nt
TalkingDog
(9,001 posts)Could you copy that particular tweet and post it here?
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)TalkingDog
(9,001 posts)n/t
riverwalker
(8,694 posts)same You Tube video
StarryNite
(9,446 posts)How many machines would have to be tweaked to flip the vote to change the outcome of the election in a tight race?
This fucking sucks!
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)NPR is linking to this, somewhere in PA:
&feature=plcpProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)Bladian
(475 posts)I'm hoping this is a fluke. This is TOO overt, in my opinion, to be voter fraud. If they were going to fuck up the system they'd make it so you thought it was okay, but behind the scenes it was FUBAR. Not so the voter could clearly see it was wrong.
randome
(34,845 posts)In fact, a program would need to go OUT OF ITS WAY to update the screen instead of just the numbers.
I know it's somehow 'exciting' to think that this is coordinated election fraud but it most likely is not.
A couple of malfunctioning machines is not enough to sway this election. Perhaps more will be found but it would have been noticed if it was more widespread than this.
Most likely the touch sensors behind he screen are malfunctioning or placed incorrectly or something.
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)Unless you have VVPATs and audits, you can't.
Unless you open the tabulating software to scrutiny, you can't.
randome
(34,845 posts)But this specific instance appears to be a machine malfunction, not some clumsy attempt to sway some votes.
Republicans are stupid but they're not THIS stupid.
argiel1234
(390 posts)they are not this stupid. They were careless on a couple of the electronic voting machines, hence the visual discrepancy.
oh, and electronic voting needs to be made illegal
no one is buying the bullshit anymore.
NO ONE
randome
(34,845 posts)The program would have to deliberately update the screen to reflect the changed vote. That's not 'carelessness'.
Ergo, the most likely explanation is faulty touch screen sensors.
argiel1234
(390 posts)Interesting that you seem to be ok with electronic touch screen voting
actually it isnt after reading your comments
Did you know that Mitt Romneys son holds interests in a particular touch screen company?
you know the son of the guy who is the other candidate?
Like I said no one is buying the bullshit anymore
randome
(34,845 posts)I'm aware of all you said but I still say that doesn't explain why 2 machines out of how many tens of thousands malfunctioned this way.
It doesn't have to be bullshit to look at the facts dispassionately.
Flatulo
(5,005 posts)screw up his malicious code so that the screen displayed the vote flip would required lots of extra lines of code, not simply typos. When code has typos or simple errors in it, it just does not run.
It would be like shaking a box of bolts and expecting a toaster to come out fully assembled. It just doesn't happen.
It would indeed be far, far easier to flip the vote in the background so the voter would have absolutely no reason for concern.
Sorry, but your post just comes across as uneducated and irrational.
And no, I do not support electronic machines with no paper trail. Fortunately I got to vote on a paper ballot that is read by an optical scanner, but is available for human review if a recount is called for.
argiel1234
(390 posts)and worked debugging software for MRI machines in a previous job
when did i say typos? lol
Oh and,
No one is buying the bullshit anymore
randome
(34,845 posts)Deliberate coding is needed to update the screen. That would not be carelessness. That would be a deliberate attempt to show the user that their vote is being changed, which kind of invalidates the idea that this is some sort of nefarious plot to 'secretly' change votes.
argiel1234
(390 posts)Get rid of illegal electronic voting and illegal optical scanning garbage machines.
I already stated that Mitt Romney's son owns financial interests in a electronic voting company.
If you are fine with this just say so and own it
randome
(34,845 posts)I won't run around with my hair on fire until someone can convince me that my hair is, indeed, aflame.
argiel1234
(390 posts)Mitt Romneys son owns financial stakes in a electronic voting machine company
Mitt Romneys son owns financial stakes in a electronic voting machine company
Mitt Romneys son owns financial stakes in a electronic voting machine company
Mitt Romneys son owns financial stakes in a electronic voting machine company
I will repeat as necessary while you light your hair on fire with your fingers in your ears singing LALALALALA
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)t doesn't happen"
Isn't that how we got Romney in the first place?
Flatulo
(5,005 posts)mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)That would explain why he isn't consistent on anything
gkhouston
(21,642 posts)ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)A few here, a few there, kind of adds up somewhere!
randome
(34,845 posts)But what are the odds that a Republican hacker would deliberately update the screen to reflect the changed vote? I'd say practically nil.
Clyde39
(1,074 posts)Makes you wonder how many times this has happened and if it has changed outcomes.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)http://www.wsoctv.com/news/news/local/some-voters-report-problems-polls/nSyTL/
Also, why would anyone who was trying to alter the vote risk exposure by making votes flip in California, where Romney has zero chance of winning?
http://politicalinsider.blogs.mydesert.com/2012/11/06/voter-problems-stubs-electronic-voting-machines/
KatyBR
(183 posts)Her twitter account is:
Rachel Maddow MSNBC
@maddow
randome
(34,845 posts)And don't deluge her online accounts with something unless we have more information.
As I say above, this is much more likely to be a touch screen sensor malfunction, nothing more than that.
ecstatic
(32,710 posts)Excuse me, that's wrong. Even third world countries have better systems.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)TinCup
(54 posts)This is no accident, it is a deliberate attempt to change the vote.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Hubert Flottz
(37,726 posts)Were republicans the county officials in charge of elections in these counties? Does PA have a republican SoS?
ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)I want to KNOW what can be done??? I DO NOT TRUST REPUKES & as I said on another thread, I believe it's TAG who bought into ESS&S machines in Ohio!
How do we know that there aren't Romney surrogates screwing things up too?? I can't take this stuff again!
Berlum
(7,044 posts)as usual
argiel1234
(390 posts)and are funded and supported by the 1%
not surprising at all
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)And sent to a lab for testing. Since there is a potential crime here I don't believe that proprietary software rules apply. These things can be reversed engineered so answers can be found. It is long past time to get to the bottom of this. If it leads to corporate headquarters, so be it.
mainer
(12,022 posts)Cannot be left to states.
valerief
(53,235 posts)smccarter
(145 posts)This could be as simple as the terminal needs to be recalibrated.
Having said that, I wouldn't cast my vote on a machine that doesn't register the correct vote. I would hope to think that noone else would either. If you select one candidate and it registers a vote for a different candidate.... take 2 steps back and ask to have the terminal removed as it is NOT registering the correct vote. Ask to be allowed to cast your vote on a different terminal and cast your vote there. If it also registers incorrectly, go back a couple of steps and start the process over.
If you're asked to provide a photo ID, provide a photo ID. If you're told months ahead of time that you're going to need a photo ID to vote, go get a photo ID.
I agree that there are problems, that several claims seem realistic and even suspicious. The idea that anyone associated with Mitt Romney owns any portion of any company that manufactures and provides voting machines to any state during a presidential election is definitely a question of ethics. But let's be serious here, we all have a responsibility to make sure that we don't cast a vote for the wrong candidate just because we're not prepared to step back, bring the issue to the attention of an official and ask to cast our vote on a different machine.
I cast my vote last Wednesday for a fine man. One that needs to remain in office for 4 more years. President Obama needs to remain in office to see this recovery through. I'm baffled as to how ANYONE could vote for Mitt Romney.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)so thankfully, none of that electronic crap out here.