Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe're not just electing a President, but two or three SCOTUS judges
Lost in much of the Presidential Election flurry this year is that the nation isn't just electing a President and countless elected officials who have the power to affect a wide swath of public policy.
We're also electing in essence two Supreme Court judges at a time when the Court sits on the edge of a knife. A Romney victory would almost certainly mean the end of Roe v. Wade. It would mean the obliteration of worker protections and any last remnants of controls on spending in elections. A Romney Presidency would have earthshaking implications that would extend far, far beyond the four to eight years he would be President. It would guarantee a two-generation dominance of the Supreme Court by the right wing.
Even if President Obama wins, there's also the issue of the confirmation of his justices to the Supreme Court. The right wing knows the stakes and will as much as they possible can to prevent the nomination of Obama's justices.
If that's not enough to get out to vote enthusiastically in a way that prevents Romney from becoming President and that puts as many Democrats into the Senate to ensure confirmation of his judicial appointments, I can't imagine what would be.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2012/11/were-not-just-electing-president-but.html
We're also electing in essence two Supreme Court judges at a time when the Court sits on the edge of a knife. A Romney victory would almost certainly mean the end of Roe v. Wade. It would mean the obliteration of worker protections and any last remnants of controls on spending in elections. A Romney Presidency would have earthshaking implications that would extend far, far beyond the four to eight years he would be President. It would guarantee a two-generation dominance of the Supreme Court by the right wing.
Even if President Obama wins, there's also the issue of the confirmation of his justices to the Supreme Court. The right wing knows the stakes and will as much as they possible can to prevent the nomination of Obama's justices.
If that's not enough to get out to vote enthusiastically in a way that prevents Romney from becoming President and that puts as many Democrats into the Senate to ensure confirmation of his judicial appointments, I can't imagine what would be.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2012/11/were-not-just-electing-president-but.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 593 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We're not just electing a President, but two or three SCOTUS judges (Original Post)
phantom power
Nov 2012
OP
still_one
(92,217 posts)1. No question about it. People, especially women have to realize that
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)2. Kick!
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)3. Yes. This election is huge, no matter how one looks at it.
I'm not about to say that the gains will be great if Obama wins, but the losses will be insanely ugly and huge if he loses.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)4. Damn straight.