Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow many House seats did Dems have before last night?
Sorry, I should know this, but I don't. I am trying to figure out if Andrea Mitchell was right when she said that Dems did horribly in the House.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
17 replies, 2834 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
17 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How many House seats did Dems have before last night? (Original Post)
renie408
Nov 2012
OP
The same number they have today. The newly elected members don't check in until January.
HopeHoops
Nov 2012
#5
DarthDem
(5,256 posts)1. Great Question
It was 240-190 with five vacancies going into the election. So I'm not sure what Mrs. Greenspan was talking about. It looks to me that we will pick up a few seats.
renie408
(9,854 posts)3. That's what I thought.
I couldn't understand why she said we did horribly.
Well, I mean, I DO understand why she said it, I just thought she was wrong.
demwing
(16,916 posts)2. looks like picked up a few seats
Last edited Wed Nov 7, 2012, 10:41 AM - Edit history (1)
2010 totals = R 242 / D 193
not 292
demwing
(16,916 posts)17. yep, corrected, ty /nt
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)4. Democrats should have a net gain of around seven seats
A party needs 218 seats to control the House. The party mix in the new House will resemble the current one, which Republicans control by 240-190. There are two GOP and three Democratic vacancies. The GOP and Democratic pickups were pretty generally divided.
By early Wednesday, Democrats had defeated 12 GOP House incumbents 10 of them members of the huge tea party-backed freshman class of 2010. Republican losers included four incumbents from Illinois, two each from New Hampshire and New York, and one apiece from Florida, Maryland, Minnesota and Texas.
But Republicans picked up nine previously Democratic seats. Their candidates defeated one Democratic incumbent apiece in Kentucky, New York, North Carolina and Pennsylvania; they picked up one open seat each in Arkansas, California, Indiana, North Carolina and Oklahoma currently held by Democrats who retired or ran for another office.
With almost 90 percent of the 435 House races called by The Associated Press, Republicans had won 227 seats and were leading in nine more. For a majority in the chamber, a party must control 218 seats. Democrats had won 178 seats and were leading in 19 others.
http://news.yahoo.com/democrats-expand-senate-grip-fail-win-house-091429573--election.html
By early Wednesday, Democrats had defeated 12 GOP House incumbents 10 of them members of the huge tea party-backed freshman class of 2010. Republican losers included four incumbents from Illinois, two each from New Hampshire and New York, and one apiece from Florida, Maryland, Minnesota and Texas.
But Republicans picked up nine previously Democratic seats. Their candidates defeated one Democratic incumbent apiece in Kentucky, New York, North Carolina and Pennsylvania; they picked up one open seat each in Arkansas, California, Indiana, North Carolina and Oklahoma currently held by Democrats who retired or ran for another office.
With almost 90 percent of the 435 House races called by The Associated Press, Republicans had won 227 seats and were leading in nine more. For a majority in the chamber, a party must control 218 seats. Democrats had won 178 seats and were leading in 19 others.
http://news.yahoo.com/democrats-expand-senate-grip-fail-win-house-091429573--election.html
llmart
(15,552 posts)14. I'd call this as a rousing denouncement.....
of teabaggers
I'm hoping the media just ignores them from now on and they dwindle down to obscurity.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)5. The same number they have today. The newly elected members don't check in until January.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)7. I know, I know. I couldn't resist.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)9. Well, come on. It was an obvious straight line.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)10. Like your #7
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)12. Shit. That reminded me of the movie "The World's Greatest Lover".
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)11. ...
Fla Dem
(23,736 posts)13. House as of Nov. 5: D 193, R 242, I 0 n/t
DarthDem
(5,256 posts)16. Not Quite
Three of those Dem seats were vacant, and two of the thug seats were as well. So as noted upthread, it was 240-190.