Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJoan Walsh, Salon: America: Love it or be left behind
http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/america_love_it_or_be_left_behind/Great column from Walsh, starting with lots of paragraphs about GOP excuses for their loss, and then moving on to why they really lost:
A broad mandate this is not.
Really? Lets review. Obama won 93 percent of African Americans, 71 percent of Latinos and an astonishing 75 percent of Asian Americans, a group that used to split between parties. He won a majority of Catholics, Jews and Muslims as well as the religiously non-affiliated (he only lost white Protestants.) He won women and young people. The only group he lost was white people, and particularly older white people and extremely particularly older white men.
Does Obama have really have a problem attracting broad support? Or would the problem belong to the stubborn minority bloc that wont vote for him, no matter what he does? Do the math, lads.
-snip-
Analysts concerned about the depressed, disappearing or increasingly Republican white vote and Im sometimes one of them arent necessarily wrong. We should always care about those who are left out. But looking at the election results, Ive reached some limit in my capacity to offer advice about how to win over the white voters who continue to reject Obama. The uber-rich and the Galtian weirdos dont worry me; there arent many of them. I care more about the economically marginal who are for some reason anxious about racial change, but Im not sure much can be done for them.
When I reviewed Pat Buchanans last book a year ago, Suicide of a Superpower, I marveled that Nixons best strategist of the white working class, who went on to work with Ronald Reagan and do some of the same things for him, was reaching the end of his life feeling like a failure, because despite his best efforts to advance the interests of white people, theyd be a minority in the not too distant future. I felt bad for Buchanan, a little, I really did. I cant really imagine deciding that the America I love is dying if its traditions and its heartbeat pulse within people who maybe look different from me. But thats how Buchanan feels.
I think whites like Buchanan are a small minority, but there are more of them than I thought. The Next America Project does a lot of great polling on racial issues and found that whites who fear racial change favored Romney 2-1; whites who welcomed it went for Obama 3-2. And for those who think the GOP can solve its demographic issues with a little immigration reform: a later poll found that whites who fear immigrants went for Romney 9-1. (So good luck making a little nip and tuck to your immigration policies, GOP.)
These are the people who back in the 1960s became the self-appointed guardians of American identity, the definers of American exceptionalism, whose tribalism was captured by the old snarl: America: Love it or Leave It, one of the signs carried by the Hard Hat Rioters of 1970 as they beat up anti-war activists (which I write about it my book.) But maybe its time to say to them: America: Love it or be left behind.
I love this country, but would never say love it or leave it. Its not in the liberal nature to issue ultimatums like that, or to define American identity unilaterally. But I think the people who are so angry about the Obama years, who want to take their country back (as if it belonged only to them) do have to face reality: if they dont love the America thats being born, thats reflected in the Obama coalition, theyre going to be left behind. They dont have to get out, but theyll be increasingly unhappy living here. Thats their choice. Ill go on looking for ways to reach out to people who seem genuinely not to understand that theres a place for them here, to help shepherd them to our common future. The hundreds of Ole Miss kids who burned Obama-Biden signs and spewed racial epithets election night? Theyre on their own.
-snip-
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1543 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Joan Walsh, Salon: America: Love it or be left behind (Original Post)
highplainsdem
Nov 2012
OP
Iggy, see reply 2 below, which is really intended as a reply to your post and not my OP.
highplainsdem
Nov 2012
#3
Iggy
(1,418 posts)1. Mehhh
NOT interested in what Walsh has to say now.
he need to focus on PAYING his child support and being some sort of sane father to his kids
anything else is irrelevant, IMHO
highplainsdem
(49,012 posts)3. Iggy, see reply 2 below, which is really intended as a reply to your post and not my OP.
This column is by Salon editor JOAN Walsh, whom you've seen on TV a lot if you watch MSNBC at all. She's one of the best progressives around.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)2. This is JOAN Walsh, a woman, NOT deadbeat dad Joe Walsh.
And NOT Joe Walsh of the Eagles.
highplainsdem
(49,012 posts)6. kick