General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnother "If less minorities had voted, we would have won" comment by the GOP
It seems to be their main point. How did these people dare to vote? (or a more polite version, but clearly intended to mean the same thing).
Yesterday, it was Paul Ryan saying that if urban districts had not voted so much, they would have won. Today, it is somebody else from WI.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2012/11/if_only.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Talking-Points-Memo+%28Talking+Points+Memo%3A+by+Joshua+Micah+Marshall%29
Romney Wisconsin co-chair says if only theyd had voter ID, Romney would have won the state
So, this is what the GOP is for: less people voting.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)The republican democracy
Mayberry Machiavelli
(21,096 posts)deutsey
(20,166 posts)They're all depressed that their voter suppression strategy failed so miserably.
sinkingfeeling
(51,474 posts)tactics.
peace13
(11,076 posts)we might have had one chance in *ell of winning!"
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,906 posts)They want less blacks, latinos, and other minorities voting.
And every single minority including myself will note it, and remember it.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)Probably some socialist bastard.
MineralMan
(146,333 posts)only white landowners could vote.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)Maybe it's time to get rid of the term, 'minorities'. After all it is a divisive word.
I wonder what it means then, that there were a LOT of cross ticket voting? People voted for Obama and for Ryan (for assembley). But I guess it could have been the vote flipping I heard about in Paddock Lake, where the vote went from Rob Zerbon to Paul Ryan...
xfundy
(5,105 posts)Everything.