Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 12:19 PM Nov 2012

"In the US, shale gas didn't exist in 2004. Now it represents 30% of the market."

How cheap energy from shale will reshape America's role in the world

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/nov/15/shale-energy-implications-geopolitics-america

After the fall of the Berlin Wall, the rise of China and the Arab spring, American energy independence looks likely to trigger the next great geopolitical shift in the modern world.

.......

Exploitation of fields in Appalachian states such as West Virginia and Pennsylvania, and further west in North Dakota, have transformed the US's energy outlook pretty much overnight. Professor Dieter Helm, an energy expert at Oxford University, said: "In the US, shale gas didn't exist in 2004. Now it represents 30% of the market."

If all the known shale gas resources were developed to their commercial potential in North America and other new fields, production could more than quadruple over the next two decades, and account for more than half of US natural gas production by the early 2030s, according to recent study by the Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Centre.

.......

Long-term consequences for the rest of the world are hard to predict but it is probably safe to say that many of the regimes whose global role rests on hydrocarbons alone are likely to be significantly weakened, if not swept away.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
1. It didn't exist because it wasn't profitable until 2004.
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 12:26 PM
Nov 2012

If we could find easy to extract oil, shale gas would still be a future product.

doc03

(35,354 posts)
4. I live in one of those areas and so far I have seen none of this
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 01:37 PM
Nov 2012

(destroying). You drill a well it disturbs about 5 acres of ground. A few weeks after the wells are drilled the only evidence left is a pipe coming out of the ground and a brine tank. In this area we have 5 new motels that have just opened or under construction to house drillers and pipe-liners. All the camp grounds are packed with campers and many people rent out camping space in their yards for the workers. We have several plants being built to process the gas that will make permanent jobs. The gas-fracking is the first positive economic news in this area for 40 years. Anyone that has acreage has got checks for drilling rights (many instant millionaires) and royalty checks are coming in.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
6. i wonder how long it takes to totally damage the water table?
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 01:41 PM
Nov 2012

I hope it does't happen, but do we ever see these guys leave a place unspoiled?
I guess a lot of people feel it;s worth the gamble, because they can afford to leave now.

doc03

(35,354 posts)
8. Building a windmill on a mountaintop causes more damage to the surface
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 01:49 PM
Nov 2012

environment than a gas well. As far as the water table goes I think the strip mining for coal in this area has done more to damage the water table than fracking ever will. Those wells are a mile deep, far below the water table in my opinion. As far as peoples water wells getting gas in them that probably can be traced back to coal mining in most cases if not all.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
11. Im not worried about windmills, but am about public health disasters. I know there's a lot of
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 02:05 PM
Nov 2012

concern and controversy about the fracking happening in upstate NY. It could effect water quality and impact the health of many millions of people.
Energy companies have a very poor track record and historically prefer to pay fines later than act responsibly. It's new technology, and if there wasn't fortunes to be made now, I'm sure residents would be taking a much harder look at the risks. Because they'd have to stay at live with any fallout. But they don't, just their poor neighbors and everyone downstream.

Agony

(2,605 posts)
12. Sure, ignoring the compressor stations and gathering lines necessary to get the gas into the
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 02:12 PM
Nov 2012

midstream. The compressor stations that emit BTEX 24 hours a day. The 800 heavy truck trips necessary to develop each well. The re-fracking necessary to maintain production levels that the un-conventional gas industry has been lying about in order to finance their get rich quick at our expense scheme. This is landscape level industrialization of rural areas that has been deregulated by the usual plutocrats without regard for the consequences to the rest of us.

cilla4progress

(24,746 posts)
3. Does this mean US is positioned to become one of the world's biggest energy producers
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 12:42 PM
Nov 2012

in the coming decades?

Is this fracking?

What are the environmental pitfalls?

Is this bottom line a positive thing?

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
7. Yes and yes to your first two questions.
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 01:42 PM
Nov 2012

A discussion of the environmental issues is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_hydraulic_fracturing
Obviously we need to be very careful to monitor and control this activity so that it does not cause pollution or contamination.

And anything which makes us less beholden to the crazies in the Middle East is a positive in my book.


 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
5. And at what cost?
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 01:40 PM
Nov 2012

Pollution of the water, pollution of the air. A continued reliance on fossil fuels because they are going to continue to be relatively cheap. The long term consequences of continuing our fossil fuel addiction are only now being recognized.

Agony

(2,605 posts)
10. Stupid fucking article completely ignores all the CO2 and Methane that will enter the atmosphere
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 02:02 PM
Nov 2012

as greenhouse gases.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"In the US, shale ga...