General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"In the US, shale gas didn't exist in 2004. Now it represents 30% of the market."
How cheap energy from shale will reshape America's role in the world
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/nov/15/shale-energy-implications-geopolitics-america
After the fall of the Berlin Wall, the rise of China and the Arab spring, American energy independence looks likely to trigger the next great geopolitical shift in the modern world.
.......
Exploitation of fields in Appalachian states such as West Virginia and Pennsylvania, and further west in North Dakota, have transformed the US's energy outlook pretty much overnight. Professor Dieter Helm, an energy expert at Oxford University, said: "In the US, shale gas didn't exist in 2004. Now it represents 30% of the market."
If all the known shale gas resources were developed to their commercial potential in North America and other new fields, production could more than quadruple over the next two decades, and account for more than half of US natural gas production by the early 2030s, according to recent study by the Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Centre.
.......
Long-term consequences for the rest of the world are hard to predict but it is probably safe to say that many of the regimes whose global role rests on hydrocarbons alone are likely to be significantly weakened, if not swept away.
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)If we could find easy to extract oil, shale gas would still be a future product.
Champion Jack
(5,378 posts)doc03
(35,354 posts)(destroying). You drill a well it disturbs about 5 acres of ground. A few weeks after the wells are drilled the only evidence left is a pipe coming out of the ground and a brine tank. In this area we have 5 new motels that have just opened or under construction to house drillers and pipe-liners. All the camp grounds are packed with campers and many people rent out camping space in their yards for the workers. We have several plants being built to process the gas that will make permanent jobs. The gas-fracking is the first positive economic news in this area for 40 years. Anyone that has acreage has got checks for drilling rights (many instant millionaires) and royalty checks are coming in.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I hope it does't happen, but do we ever see these guys leave a place unspoiled?
I guess a lot of people feel it;s worth the gamble, because they can afford to leave now.
doc03
(35,354 posts)environment than a gas well. As far as the water table goes I think the strip mining for coal in this area has done more to damage the water table than fracking ever will. Those wells are a mile deep, far below the water table in my opinion. As far as peoples water wells getting gas in them that probably can be traced back to coal mining in most cases if not all.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)concern and controversy about the fracking happening in upstate NY. It could effect water quality and impact the health of many millions of people.
Energy companies have a very poor track record and historically prefer to pay fines later than act responsibly. It's new technology, and if there wasn't fortunes to be made now, I'm sure residents would be taking a much harder look at the risks. Because they'd have to stay at live with any fallout. But they don't, just their poor neighbors and everyone downstream.
Agony
(2,605 posts)midstream. The compressor stations that emit BTEX 24 hours a day. The 800 heavy truck trips necessary to develop each well. The re-fracking necessary to maintain production levels that the un-conventional gas industry has been lying about in order to finance their get rich quick at our expense scheme. This is landscape level industrialization of rural areas that has been deregulated by the usual plutocrats without regard for the consequences to the rest of us.
Kaleva
(36,315 posts)cilla4progress
(24,746 posts)in the coming decades?
Is this fracking?
What are the environmental pitfalls?
Is this bottom line a positive thing?
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)A discussion of the environmental issues is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_hydraulic_fracturing
Obviously we need to be very careful to monitor and control this activity so that it does not cause pollution or contamination.
And anything which makes us less beholden to the crazies in the Middle East is a positive in my book.
MadHound
(34,179 posts)Pollution of the water, pollution of the air. A continued reliance on fossil fuels because they are going to continue to be relatively cheap. The long term consequences of continuing our fossil fuel addiction are only now being recognized.
Agony
(2,605 posts)as greenhouse gases.