It's a shame our get-out-the-vote effort failed.

...is okay in my book!

I'm thinking that's better than believing he's looking over his shoulders, but that's just me.

And I keep thinking "Investigated by whom"?

Who is going to pull the trigger on that snake pit, eh?

I don't see our political establishment dealing with what's going to come out of a serious investigation of Rove's nefarious schemes, no way, no how. It wouldn't be remotely prudent for the Village to gaze into this particular abyss.

"I don't see our political establishment dealing with what's going to come out of a serious investigation of Rove's nefarious schemes, no way, no how. It wouldn't be remotely prudent for the Village to gaze into this particular abyss."

...the excuse for not pushing for evidence that could lead to an investigation is that it wouldn't be "remotely prudent" for them?

Well, then let's spare them. In fact, let's never push them again, on anything, it's clearly a waste of time.

Nancy told us impeachment was off the table a long time ago, why would the Democrats want to criminalize policy differences?

I'm dreaming of a White Fitzmas.

"Nancy told us impeachment was off the table a long time ago, why would the Democrats want to criminalize policy differences?"

This is a reason for not presenting evidence? I mean, you seem to have it figured out so why bother demanding action for anything?

Just an acceptance of the limits of the possible.

The Democrats simply aren't going to go full metal jacket investigate the crap out of the Republicans, the Village will never let them get away with it, just making enough fainting couches for the M$M would employ the carpenters and upholsterers of three New England states until the next St Bartholomew's day and MSNDAP alone would be buying imported smelling salts by the tanker load.

I'm kind of getting annoyed with Anonymous, in fact I stopped following them on Twitter because lately all they have done is complain and not offer any ideas on how to change things.

And that letter was found on the internet! You know, the World Wide Web. The shining beacon for all that is reliable and true.

There's no way that could possibly be a fake.

And that the votes were actually flipped in Obama's favor simply because it's still his "turn"?

I've read your post a few times and that's the only interpretation I can come up with.

If the voting is cooked, maybe the public polling is too,and if that's cooked, maybe the private polling. How could you possibly make a claim about a social phenomenon (about a population) under such conditions of uncertainty.

Maybe "they" just want you to think there is a general liberalism, because then when they cook the election. you will inevitably get a fringe group screaming "FRAUD," which it really is anyway, but it's more effective when the fringe group really believes it, and so your very doubt about the election is not only part of the conspiracy, but an essential part of making the conspiracy run, since the fringeness of the fringe persuades the midstream not to adopt the fringe view, thereby persuading people who would otherwise agree that there must have been some fraud to ignore such claims, because they don't want to be associated withn the fringe element in its very fringeness.

Maybe YOU'RE the designed effect of doctored public polls, and when YOU believe that the American electorate is generally liberal, you are only believing precisely what they want you to believe!

Maybe that's what's going on. Who's to tell?

I could never understand why Rove had not been jailed with Scooter Libby