Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jello Biafra

(439 posts)
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 08:26 AM Jan 2012

SCYTL Acquires SOE Software, Becoming the Leading Election Software Provider

Posted on Friday, January 13, 2012 - 8:20 am

Permission to reprint granted, with link to http://www.blackboxvoting.org

In a major step towards global centralization of election processes, the world's dominant Internet voting company has purchased the USA's dominant election results reporting company.

When you view your local or state election results on the Internet, on portals which often appear to be owned by the county elections division, in over 525 US jurisdictions you are actually redirected to a private corporate site controlled by SOE software, which operates under the name ClarityElections.com.

The good news is that this firm promptly reports precinct-level detail in downloadable spreadsheet format. As reported by BlackBoxVoting.org in 2008, the bad news is that this centralizes one middleman access point for over 525 jurisdictions in AL, AZ, CA, CO, DC, FL, KY, MI, KS, IL, IN, NC, NM, MN, NY, SC, TX, UT, WA. And growing.

As local election results funnel through SOE's servers (typically before they reach the public elsewhere), those who run the computer servers for SOE essentially get "first look" at results and the ability to immediately and privately examine vote details throughout the USA.

In 2004, many Americans were justifiably concerned when, days before the presidential election, Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell redirected Ohio election night results through the Tennessee-based server for several national Republican Party operations.

This is worse: This redirects results reporting to a centralized privately held server which is not just for Ohio, but national; not just USA-based, but global.

A mitigation against fraud by SOE insiders has been the separation of voting machine systems from the SOE results reports. Because most US jurisdictions require posting evidence of results from each voting machine at the precinct, public citizens can organize to examine these results to compare with SOE results. Black Box Voting spearheaded a national citizen action to videotape / photograph these poll tapes in 2008.

-snip-

Here is the link to the post...

http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/8/81816.html?1326486710

The link at the bottom expired so I found a link elsewhere:

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120111005635/en/SCYTL-Acquires-SOE-Software-Leading-Election-Software

Your vote doesn't seem to count anymore...the system IMO is rigged.....

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCYTL Acquires SOE Software, Becoming the Leading Election Software Provider (Original Post) Jello Biafra Jan 2012 OP
Why cant we get people to demand voter verifiable paper receipts? Modify the machine to output peacebird Jan 2012 #1
Is our vote now merely a formality to keep up appearances of democracy? Patriot act, ndaa, etc.... peacebird Jan 2012 #2

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
1. Why cant we get people to demand voter verifiable paper receipts? Modify the machine to output
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 08:31 AM
Jan 2012

A paper receipt. Voter reads it and places it in the ballot box in front of the poll worker. If there is any question about results the paper ballots are counted.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCYTL Acquires SOE Softwa...