Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,996 posts)
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 10:28 AM Jan 2012

CONFIRMED-Murdoch Corporate Cover-Up & Repeated Hacking ON US SOIL!

12.36pm: Here is a lunchtime summary of today's developments so far:

• News International has paid out £645,000 in damages to 15 victims of phone hacking – and "substantial" damages in three separate cases – plus legal costs.

• Jude Law has been awarded £130,000 in damages as it emerged the actor was targeted on US soil.

• The former deputy prime minister, John Prescott, has received £40,000 in damages.

MORE: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jan/19/phone-hacking-news-international-settles

Jude Law statement read out: phone hacked repeatedly - including on US soil at JFK airport #phonehacking




gordonrayner Gordon Rayner
QC accuses NGN of "deliberately destroying" PCs of 8 journalists accused in phone #hacking row
1 hour ago

https://twitter.com/gordonrayner



...settlement orders contain a specific provision that new claims can be brought in certain circumstances where further wrongdoing emerges in the future. This was important because attempts are being made to reconstruct email archives which had been destroyed by News Group in an apparent attempt to cover up wrongdoing.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jan/19/phone-hacking-news-international-settles?newsfeed=true
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CONFIRMED-Murdoch Corporate Cover-Up & Repeated Hacking ON US SOIL! (Original Post) kpete Jan 2012 OP
So.. Are there any Attorneys General interested ? . . . . n/t annabanana Jan 2012 #1
Those would be US Attorneys hootinholler Jan 2012 #10
Awesome! If only this meant someone named Murdoch would spend minute ONE in jail!! HughBeaumont Jan 2012 #2
let's get the investigations going, hey congress?????? spanone Jan 2012 #3
+1,000 malaise Jan 2012 #12
Jail the Murdochs! Nt xchrom Jan 2012 #4
K and R all Murdoch scandal threads Kingofalldems Jan 2012 #5
I wonder if Roger Ailes knew about this? Octafish Jan 2012 #6
Newsflash: Our DOJ will do NOTHING! CanonRay Jan 2012 #7
Remember how we always thought the dems in Congress acted like someone had threatened them? deminks Jan 2012 #8
If I recall correctly, California has enforced its anti-eavesdropping laws. JDPriestly Jan 2012 #9
K & R Scurrilous Jan 2012 #11

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
10. Those would be US Attorneys
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 03:08 PM
Jan 2012

Attorneys General are officers of States government. So far it would only be the NY AG who would have jurisdiction and the US Attorney for NY.

I am hopeful for a grand jury proceeding in this case, but we would not likely hear about it until people who are subpoenaed speak in the news. I doubt any News Corp employee would want it public that they had given testimony.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
2. Awesome! If only this meant someone named Murdoch would spend minute ONE in jail!!
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 10:30 AM
Jan 2012

But sadly, it won't.

Some underlings will do that time.

Or not.

Scandals are OK a) if you're a Republican and b) you don't screw fellow rich people over.

CanonRay

(14,104 posts)
7. Newsflash: Our DOJ will do NOTHING!
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 11:06 AM
Jan 2012

Eric Holder does not have the balls to take on Rupert. Sorry folks, nothing to see here.

deminks

(11,014 posts)
8. Remember how we always thought the dems in Congress acted like someone had threatened them?
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 11:14 AM
Jan 2012

We thought they were spineless, they wouldn't stand up to anything. For years under Bush and even now. I wonder if it all isn't just about money, but maybe someone did threaten them with something.

Pure speculation on my part. If I were investigating, that is where I would go. Of course, it could be all just about money, too - lots and lots of money. Or both.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
9. If I recall correctly, California has enforced its anti-eavesdropping laws.
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 12:19 PM
Jan 2012

Anthony Pellicano --

Wikileaks:

In a subsequent six-week Federal Court trial, Pellicano was convicted of wiretapping and conspiracy to commit wiretapping.[4] Facing 78 guilty counts and not being allowed to co-serve his two convictions, Pellicano was sentenced in December 2008 to fifteen additional years in prison and ordered (with two other defendants) to forfeit $2 million.[5]

. . . .

On March 17, 2006, the "Page Six" gossip column in the New York Post reported that actress Nicole Kidman was questioned by the FBI as part of the ongoing Pellicano investigation. Telephone voice recordings of Tom Cruise speaking to his wife at the time, Nicole, were found when authorities first raided Pellicano's offices in 2002. The tapes were allegedly made in 2001, shortly after the Cruises announced they were separating. Cruise used lawyer Dennis Wasser to negotiate his separation and Wasser regularly retained Pellicano's services. Although he has not been charged in the case, Wasser has been told by the FBI he is a "person of interest."[19][20]

. . . .

On August 10, 2006, the Los Angeles Times reported that businessman Kirk Kerkorian's attorneys have been sued by his former wife Lisa Bonder's attorney because of their connection to Pellicano. Bonder's attorney alleges that Kerkorian's lawyers hired Pellicano to wiretap telephone calls illegally between him and Bonder in order to gain a tactical advantage in the Kerkorian divorce proceedings.[23] While working for Kerkorian, Pellicano investigated his friend Steve Bing, testing a strand of used dental floss taken from Bing's trash and proving Bing had fathered Bonder's daughter.

According to an FBI summary, Pellicano was known to play Hollywood clients against each other, at one point asking financier Ron Burkle for a $100,000 to $250,000 shakedown not to be investigated by Michael Ovitz, another Pellicano client.[24] In a twist to the case on April 12, 2007, The New York Times revealed evidence that movie producer Steve Bing, while also being investigated by Pellicano, also paid Pellicano $335,000 between June 2000 and August 2002. Excerpts from audiotapes show Pellicano bragging to Kerkorian's lawyer in April and May 2002 that he was "working for" and "consulting for" Bing in matters related to Elizabeth Hurley and her pregnancy (the paternity of which initially Bing disputed). A lawyer for Bing, Martin Singer, called Pellicano's statement regarding Hurley "an absolute lie." (In 2003, the Daily Mail retracted a story and reportedly paid a "substantial" settlement to Bing after Pellicano's sworn statement that he had "never been engaged by Mr. Bing nor his attorney Mr. Martin Singer to investigate anyone on Mr. Bing’s behalf, including Ms. Hurley."[25])

Lots more at . . . .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Pellicano

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CONFIRMED-Murdoch Corpora...