General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCONFIRMED-Murdoch Corporate Cover-Up & Repeated Hacking ON US SOIL!
12.36pm: Here is a lunchtime summary of today's developments so far:
News International has paid out £645,000 in damages to 15 victims of phone hacking and "substantial" damages in three separate cases plus legal costs.
Jude Law has been awarded £130,000 in damages as it emerged the actor was targeted on US soil.
The former deputy prime minister, John Prescott, has received £40,000 in damages.
MORE: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jan/19/phone-hacking-news-international-settles
QC accuses NGN of "deliberately destroying" PCs of 8 journalists accused in phone #hacking row
1 hour ago
https://twitter.com/gordonrayner
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jan/19/phone-hacking-news-international-settles?newsfeed=true
annabanana
(52,791 posts)hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Attorneys General are officers of States government. So far it would only be the NY AG who would have jurisdiction and the US Attorney for NY.
I am hopeful for a grand jury proceeding in this case, but we would not likely hear about it until people who are subpoenaed speak in the news. I doubt any News Corp employee would want it public that they had given testimony.
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)But sadly, it won't.
Some underlings will do that time.
Or not.
Scandals are OK a) if you're a Republican and b) you don't screw fellow rich people over.
spanone
(135,844 posts)xchrom
(108,903 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)He's a famous clownservative, too.
CanonRay
(14,104 posts)Eric Holder does not have the balls to take on Rupert. Sorry folks, nothing to see here.
deminks
(11,014 posts)We thought they were spineless, they wouldn't stand up to anything. For years under Bush and even now. I wonder if it all isn't just about money, but maybe someone did threaten them with something.
Pure speculation on my part. If I were investigating, that is where I would go. Of course, it could be all just about money, too - lots and lots of money. Or both.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Anthony Pellicano --
Wikileaks:
In a subsequent six-week Federal Court trial, Pellicano was convicted of wiretapping and conspiracy to commit wiretapping.[4] Facing 78 guilty counts and not being allowed to co-serve his two convictions, Pellicano was sentenced in December 2008 to fifteen additional years in prison and ordered (with two other defendants) to forfeit $2 million.[5]
. . . .
On March 17, 2006, the "Page Six" gossip column in the New York Post reported that actress Nicole Kidman was questioned by the FBI as part of the ongoing Pellicano investigation. Telephone voice recordings of Tom Cruise speaking to his wife at the time, Nicole, were found when authorities first raided Pellicano's offices in 2002. The tapes were allegedly made in 2001, shortly after the Cruises announced they were separating. Cruise used lawyer Dennis Wasser to negotiate his separation and Wasser regularly retained Pellicano's services. Although he has not been charged in the case, Wasser has been told by the FBI he is a "person of interest."[19][20]
. . . .
On August 10, 2006, the Los Angeles Times reported that businessman Kirk Kerkorian's attorneys have been sued by his former wife Lisa Bonder's attorney because of their connection to Pellicano. Bonder's attorney alleges that Kerkorian's lawyers hired Pellicano to wiretap telephone calls illegally between him and Bonder in order to gain a tactical advantage in the Kerkorian divorce proceedings.[23] While working for Kerkorian, Pellicano investigated his friend Steve Bing, testing a strand of used dental floss taken from Bing's trash and proving Bing had fathered Bonder's daughter.
According to an FBI summary, Pellicano was known to play Hollywood clients against each other, at one point asking financier Ron Burkle for a $100,000 to $250,000 shakedown not to be investigated by Michael Ovitz, another Pellicano client.[24] In a twist to the case on April 12, 2007, The New York Times revealed evidence that movie producer Steve Bing, while also being investigated by Pellicano, also paid Pellicano $335,000 between June 2000 and August 2002. Excerpts from audiotapes show Pellicano bragging to Kerkorian's lawyer in April and May 2002 that he was "working for" and "consulting for" Bing in matters related to Elizabeth Hurley and her pregnancy (the paternity of which initially Bing disputed). A lawyer for Bing, Martin Singer, called Pellicano's statement regarding Hurley "an absolute lie." (In 2003, the Daily Mail retracted a story and reportedly paid a "substantial" settlement to Bing after Pellicano's sworn statement that he had "never been engaged by Mr. Bing nor his attorney Mr. Martin Singer to investigate anyone on Mr. Bings behalf, including Ms. Hurley."[25])
Lots more at . . . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Pellicano