General Discussion

Amerigo Vespucci

(30,885 posts) Thu Jan 19, 2012, 11:58 AM Jan 2012

Freeper "Da Coyote" high-fives Gentleman Newt because he "asked" and "Clinton just did it anyway"

From the freeper thread - Former Gingrich Wife Says He Asked for ‘Open Marriage’

To: maggief

The diff is that Gingrich asked.

Clinton just did it anyway.

Oh, forgot, dim-bulb-crats don’t have moral restrictions.

8 posted on Thu Jan 19 2012 07:57:41 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time) by Da Coyote

Think about it...a woman would have to be OUT OF HER MIND to not want to "share" THIS:

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Freeper "Da Coyote" high-fives Gentleman Newt because he "asked" and "Clinton just did it anyway" (Original Post) Amerigo Vespucci Jan 2012 OP

OMG, that is classic. Brickbat Jan 2012 #1

Funny, I recall many, many people saying that the Clintons had an 'open marriage' sinkingfeeling Jan 2012 #2

Apparently, Newt had a different "Contract With Marriage" zbdent Jan 2012 #3

Do we really know the dymanics of the Clinton marriage, anyway? LeftinOH Jan 2012 #4

Wow. It was moral to screw someone else for a few years and when caught ask? WTF? Fuzz Jan 2012 #5

Several agreed with him too! The mental gymastics one has to go through to be a freeper must be Fuzz Jan 2012 #6

what you are watching is the primitive brain Javaman Jan 2012 #7

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)

1. OMG, that is classic.

Reply to Amerigo Vespucci (Original post)

Thu Jan 19, 2012, 11:58 AM

Jan 2012

sinkingfeeling

(51,459 posts)

2. Funny, I recall many, many people saying that the Clintons had an 'open marriage'

Reply to Amerigo Vespucci (Original post)

Thu Jan 19, 2012, 12:04 PM

Jan 2012

because Hilary didn't immediately divorce Bill.

zbdent

(35,392 posts)

3. Apparently, Newt had a different "Contract With Marriage"

Reply to Amerigo Vespucci (Original post)

Thu Jan 19, 2012, 12:35 PM

Jan 2012

than he'd let anybody else have ...

LeftinOH

(5,354 posts)

4. Do we really know the dymanics of the Clinton marriage, anyway?

Reply to Amerigo Vespucci (Original post)

Thu Jan 19, 2012, 12:51 PM

Jan 2012

Bill and Hill may have an 'understanding' of many years; that's been my impression, anyway.

Fuzz

(8,827 posts)

5. Wow. It was moral to screw someone else for a few years and when caught ask? WTF?

Reply to Amerigo Vespucci (Original post)

Thu Jan 19, 2012, 12:54 PM

Jan 2012

Fuzz

(8,827 posts)

6. Several agreed with him too! The mental gymastics one has to go through to be a freeper must be

Reply to Amerigo Vespucci (Original post)

Thu Jan 19, 2012, 12:57 PM

Jan 2012

exhausting.

Javaman

(62,530 posts)

7. what you are watching is the primitive brain

Reply to Amerigo Vespucci (Original post)

Thu Jan 19, 2012, 03:35 PM

Jan 2012

conforming to a new reality.

when something doesn't fit into their strict definition of morals and ethics, they find a way to make it fit.

Sort of like using a hammer to pound a square peg into a round hole.

Reply to this discussion