Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Better Believe It

(18,630 posts)
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 02:53 PM Jan 2012

Railroad companies fight safety rules, with help from GOP and Obama

Railroad companies fight safety rules, with help from GOP and Obama
By Justine Sharrock, Laurie Udesky and Stuart Silverstein
January 19, 2012


Less than four years after a California train disaster spurred passage of major safety legislation, railroad companies are pushing hard to relax the law’s chief provision.

They have won over key Republicans, and extracted a major concession from the Obama administration, in their bid to scale back and delay a system to prevent crashes such as the head-on collision that caused 25 deaths and 135 injuries in Chatsworth, Calif.

The Rail Safety Improvement Act, passed in late 2008 soon after the Chatsworth disaster, mandated the $13 billion project and stuck railroad companies with nearly all of the cost. The law calls for installation of a technology known as Positive Train Control, or PTC, that automatically puts the brakes on trains about to collide or derail.

The technology’s champions include the National Transportation Safety Board, an independent advisory and investigative agency. It has advocated PTC for more than two decades to prevent accidents resulting from human error, the main cause of rail crashes.

Read the full article at:

http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/18/10186068-railroad-companies-fight-safety-rules-with-help-from-gop-and-obama


The Chatsworth rail disaster in 2008 caused 25 deaths and 135 injuries


The 2005 rail crash in Graniteville, S.C., killed nine people and caused the evacuation of 5,400.



10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Railroad companies fight safety rules, with help from GOP and Obama (Original Post) Better Believe It Jan 2012 OP
Another hit piece on the President Kingofalldems Jan 2012 #1
Are you defending the railroad companies against consumer and public safety groups? Better Believe It Jan 2012 #2
And throw in a strawman Kingofalldems Jan 2012 #8
Yup, pathetic. n/t FSogol Jan 2012 #3
Pretty damn obvious, eh?...nt SidDithers Jan 2012 #5
Have you ever posted a pro-Obama thread? n/t malaise Jan 2012 #4
Yes. Do you wish to comment on the article? Better Believe It Jan 2012 #6
Headline unnecessarily suggests this is anti-Obama elleng Jan 2012 #7
Spam deleted by OKNancy (MIR Team) NicoleAnderson May 2012 #9
Spam deleted by Violet_Crumble (MIR Team) tgsgroup May 2012 #10
 

Better Believe It

(18,630 posts)
6. Yes. Do you wish to comment on the article?
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 03:11 PM
Jan 2012

Or would you rather get off topic and engage in a personal attack?

elleng

(130,973 posts)
7. Headline unnecessarily suggests this is anti-Obama
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 03:14 PM
Jan 2012

when, as usual, its more complex than that. Railroads are against costly and complex regulations and, nothing new here, want to slow down their required implementation.

'Among other grievances, the industry said federal officials wrongly required railroads to put PTC on track that by 2015 will no longer be used to haul chlorine or other extremely hazardous materials.

The Transportation Department, to settle the litigation, offered to reduce the amount of track required to have PTC. The proposal, expected to be adopted in some form this spring, would remove 7,000 to 14,000 miles of track from the mandate, a cut of about 10 percent to 20 percent.

In an Aug. 23 announcement, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood characterized the move as being in line with the Obama administration’s initiative to streamline regulation.'



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Railroad companies fight ...