General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRailroad companies fight safety rules, with help from GOP and Obama
Railroad companies fight safety rules, with help from GOP and ObamaBy Justine Sharrock, Laurie Udesky and Stuart Silverstein
January 19, 2012
Less than four years after a California train disaster spurred passage of major safety legislation, railroad companies are pushing hard to relax the laws chief provision.
They have won over key Republicans, and extracted a major concession from the Obama administration, in their bid to scale back and delay a system to prevent crashes such as the head-on collision that caused 25 deaths and 135 injuries in Chatsworth, Calif.
The Rail Safety Improvement Act, passed in late 2008 soon after the Chatsworth disaster, mandated the $13 billion project and stuck railroad companies with nearly all of the cost. The law calls for installation of a technology known as Positive Train Control, or PTC, that automatically puts the brakes on trains about to collide or derail.
The technologys champions include the National Transportation Safety Board, an independent advisory and investigative agency. It has advocated PTC for more than two decades to prevent accidents resulting from human error, the main cause of rail crashes.
Read the full article at:
http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/18/10186068-railroad-companies-fight-safety-rules-with-help-from-gop-and-obama
The Chatsworth rail disaster in 2008 caused 25 deaths and 135 injuries
The 2005 rail crash in Graniteville, S.C., killed nine people and caused the evacuation of 5,400.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)Better Believe It
(18,630 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)FSogol
(45,488 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
malaise
(269,054 posts)Better Believe It
(18,630 posts)Or would you rather get off topic and engage in a personal attack?
elleng
(130,973 posts)when, as usual, its more complex than that. Railroads are against costly and complex regulations and, nothing new here, want to slow down their required implementation.
'Among other grievances, the industry said federal officials wrongly required railroads to put PTC on track that by 2015 will no longer be used to haul chlorine or other extremely hazardous materials.
The Transportation Department, to settle the litigation, offered to reduce the amount of track required to have PTC. The proposal, expected to be adopted in some form this spring, would remove 7,000 to 14,000 miles of track from the mandate, a cut of about 10 percent to 20 percent.
In an Aug. 23 announcement, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood characterized the move as being in line with the Obama administrations initiative to streamline regulation.'