Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Sat Nov 24, 2012, 07:46 PM Nov 2012

Goldman Sachs CEO Blankfein Says Americans Should Work Longer and Receive Fewer Benefits

Multi-Millionaire Goldman Sachs CEO Blankfein Says Americans Should Work Longer and Receive Fewer Benefits

Solving the long-term solvency problem of Social Security will mean Americans retiring later in life and receiving fewer benefits, according to one Wall Street tycoon who received $16 million in compensation in 2011.

Lloyd Blankfein, the enormously wealthy CEO of Goldman Sachs, recently told CBS News that “the retirement age has to be changed.” He also remarked that “maybe some of the benefits have to be affected; maybe some of the inflation adjustments have to be revised. But in general, entitlements have to be slowed down and contained.”

Blankfein, who owns $210 million worth of Goldman Sachs stock, defended his suggestions by claiming that “Social Security wasn’t devised to be a system that supported you for a 30-year retirement after a 25-year career.”

This remark prompted a big “huh” among many who saw Blankfein’s interview. A 25-year career? If most Americans only worked 25 years, that would mean they were retiring in their forties.

http://www.allgov.com/news/top-stories/multi-millionaire-goldman-sachs-ceo-blankfein-says-americans-should-work-longer-and-receive-fewer-benefits-121123?news=846283

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

TexasBushwhacker

(20,219 posts)
5. As it is, plenty of people are having a hard time staying fully employed to age 65
Sat Nov 24, 2012, 08:41 PM
Nov 2012

People are having to retire at 62 and take a reduced benefit FOR LIFE, not because they want to, but because they can't find anyone to hire them. There is a strong incentive for people to work until they are 70 because their benefit can be increased 8% per year after their normal retirement age up to age 70. My retirement age is 66.5, so I can conceivably raise my benefit by 28% by working until I'm 70.

What they need to is raise the cap on the income subject to Social Security tax. Right now its $110K and Social Security is fine, paying the current level of benefits, until 2033. If they eliminated the cap entirely, as they have for the Medicare tax, Social Security would be healthy FOREVER. They could even increase benefits or reduce the overall tax rate from 6.25.

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
6. OldDem2012 says corporate CEOs should pay a LOT more taxes and get a LOT less pay....
Sat Nov 24, 2012, 08:48 PM
Nov 2012

....commensurate with what they actually do for a living. additionally, when they retire, they should be made to retire on Social Security and have to use Medicaid/Medicare.

Kiss my ass, Blankfein.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
13. Lloyd Blankfein is a WallStreet crook who should be behind bars:
Sat Nov 24, 2012, 11:27 PM
Nov 2012

Goldman Sachs Will Not Face Criminal Charges: Justice Department


....
The accusations were aired in a heated 2010 Congressional hearing in which Levin grilled Goldman Chief Executive Lloyd Blankfein for hours about whether it was morally correct for the firm to sell its clients products described internally as "crap".

"The department and investigative agencies ultimately concluded that the burden of proof to bring a criminal case could not be met based on the law and facts as they exist at this time," the Justice Department said in a statement late on Thursday.....

Full article:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/09/goldman-sachs-justice-department_n_1762455.html



 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
14. Social Security benefits are currently based on the 35 years of highest inflation-adjusted earnings
Sat Nov 24, 2012, 11:37 PM
Nov 2012

Any additional years worked are disregarded in the calculation.

http://www.socialsecurity.gov/pubs/10070.html#a0=0

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Goldman Sachs CEO Blankfe...