Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,010 posts)
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 02:34 PM Mar 26

'Duty to warn' guided US advance warning of the Moscow attack. Adversaries don't always listen

BY ELLEN KNICKMEYER
Updated 9:15 PM PDT, March 25, 2024
Share
WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. warning to Russia couldn’t have been plainer: Two weeks before the deadliest attack in Russia in years, Americans had publicly and privately advised President Vladimir Putin’s government that “extremists” had “imminent plans” for just such slaughter.

The United States shared those advance intelligence indications under a tenet of the U.S. intelligence community called the “duty to warn,” which obliges U.S. intelligence officials to lean toward sharing knowledge of a dire threat if conditions allow. That holds whether the targets are allies, adversaries or somewhere in between.

There’s little sign Russia acted to try to head off Friday’s attack at a concert hall on Moscow’s edge, which killed more than 130 people. The Islamic State’s affiliate in Afghanistan claimed responsibility, and the U.S. said it has information backing up the extremist group’s claim.

John Kirby, the Biden administration’s national security spokesman, made clear that the warning shouldn’t be seen as a breakthrough in U.S.-Russian relations or intelligence-sharing. “Yeah, look, there’s not going to be security assistance with Russia and the United States,” Kirby told reporters Monday.

https://apnews.com/article/russia-intelligence-duty-to-warn-ab89b8b933c1c51b25903166951a1c7a

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Duty to warn' guided US advance warning of the Moscow attack. Adversaries don't always listen (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 26 OP
It was preemptive knowing poot would MOMFUDSKI Mar 26 #1
Putin has a track record for using these attacks getagrip_already Mar 26 #2

getagrip_already

(14,757 posts)
2. Putin has a track record for using these attacks
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 02:44 PM
Mar 26

For his sadistic internal political gains.

It was clearly an isis-k attack. They even released bodycam footage.

Putin ignored every shred of evidence and went with torture testimony. We don't even know if those were the attackers.

No matter, they will be dead before anyone who speaks their language gets to speak with them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Duty to warn' guided US ...