Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,081 posts)
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 10:11 PM Mar 28

The court can't stop abortion pills

The court can’t stop abortion pills
Community support networks safeguard abortion access against anti-choice attacks

By Jex Blackmore
Mar 27, 2024 at 7:47 am




On Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court took a decisive step in the long-standing controversy over abortion post-Roe v. Wade by examining the regulatory framework surrounding mifepristone, a key drug in medical abortion protocols. This case, spotlighted for its profound implications on reproductive healthcare and the regulatory authority of the FDA, underscores the ongoing and contentious battle over abortion access in America.

The case concerns the regulation and access to mifepristone, a drug used in the majority of medical abortions across the nation. Initiated by the Texas-based Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine against the FDA’s policies, the dispute highlights significant disagreements on the safety, oversight, and accessibility of the abortion pill. These policies, which have been liberalized over the years, now allow the drug to be prescribed via telemedicine and mailed directly to patients. The challenge questions both the FDA’s original approval of mifepristone for abortion and its subsequent decisions to ease access restrictions, implicating broader debates over reproductive health care, regulatory authority, and the impact of judicial decisions on medical practice.

....(snip)....

Although medication abortion is demonstrated to be safer than widely prescribed medications such as penicillin and Viagra, the contention surrounding it is driven not by its medical application but rather by its political implications. The truth is that the anti-choice movement perceives abortion medication delivered via telehealth as a significant loophole, representing a modern method for ensuring abortion access despite legislative restrictions. Despite the availability of evidence showcasing its effectiveness and safety, as well as data highlighting the adverse outcomes of denying access to abortion, opponents of abortion rights persist in advancing their agenda, regardless of the consequences for the health and well-being of those seeking care and their families.

....(snip)....

However, hope does lie at the end of the tunnel. According to new research published in the medical journal JAMA on Monday, there were about 26,000 more self-managed medication abortions than expected based on pre-Dobbs trends and about half of the pills for self-managed medication abortions were provided by community organizations outside of the formal healthcare system. Community networks supplying abortion pills typically consist of grassroots organizations or advocacy groups operating at local, national, or international levels and provide access to reproductive healthcare, including abortion services, to individuals who may face barriers such as financial constraints, geographical distance from clinics, or legal restrictions. .................(more)

https://www.metrotimes.com/news/the-court-cant-stop-abortion-pills-35844453




6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The court can't stop abortion pills (Original Post) marmar Mar 28 OP
And there's also the proverbial and real "slippery slope" argument. no_hypocrisy Mar 29 #1
. WhiskeyGrinder Mar 29 #2
Point taken. Thank you. no_hypocrisy Mar 29 #3
Your broader point stands, though. WhiskeyGrinder Mar 29 #4
And, of course, every sperm is sacred... CTyankee Mar 29 #6
Hopefully this is correct. republianmushroom Mar 29 #5

no_hypocrisy

(46,122 posts)
1. And there's also the proverbial and real "slippery slope" argument.
Fri Mar 29, 2024, 09:36 AM
Mar 29

If you ban/forbid medication that allows for a self-managed abortion, then the next target will be birth control pills. The latter would prevent a fertilized egg from implantation on the uterine wall, thus thwarting (excuse the alliteration) the development of a zygote into an embryo and into a fetus and into a baby.

Sure, the abortion "warriors" can have their rhetoric about a "baby" being torn out of its mother's womb after being painfully dismembered. But when you're talking about stop a pregnancy at its extreme commencement, that's another argument altogether.

And from birth control pills to other forms of contraception: the diaphragm/spermicide deal, birth control implants, and so on. Anything that will interfere with pregnancy will be outlawed, starting with the abortion pill.

WhiskeyGrinder

(22,357 posts)
2. .
Fri Mar 29, 2024, 09:40 AM
Mar 29
If you ban/forbid medication that allows for a self-managed abortion, then the next target will be birth control pills. The latter would prevent a fertilized egg from implantation on the uterine wall, thus thwarting (excuse the alliteration) the development of a zygote into an embryo and into a fetus and into a baby.
That is not what the birth control pill does. The birth control pill suppresses ovulation in the first place, so there is no fertilization at all.

WhiskeyGrinder

(22,357 posts)
4. Your broader point stands, though.
Fri Mar 29, 2024, 09:58 AM
Mar 29

They are definitely coming after contraception, and certainly do spread misinformation that some forms of birth control are actually abortifacients.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The court can't stop abor...