Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One stinking juror could muck the whole guilty verdict.......i know that, and it just makes (Original Post) a kennedy Apr 15 OP
Do you want to change the entire justice system? TexasDem69 Apr 15 #1
There is no aspect of our civilization marybourg Apr 15 #8
Lynchings are SO passe JoseBalow Apr 15 #35
I agree. Aristus Apr 15 #2
I wouldn't depend on comforting stereotypes Bucky Apr 15 #27
That's the way the jury works. All 12 could say not guilty or all 12 could say guilty and any numbers in between jimfields33 Apr 15 #3
Thank you for saying that. I'm sure that won't be mentioned much in the next few weeks. ificandream Apr 15 #12
A lot of emotions are going on. Even with me. jimfields33 Apr 15 #29
This is how juries work, yes. WhiskeyGrinder Apr 15 #4
And probably get a lot of money for it, too. Think. Again. Apr 15 #5
I'm not sure it does Trump any good to have a single Trumpie do a jury nullification gulliver Apr 15 #6
I agree. There are nuts that will support Trump no matter what. LiberalFighter Apr 15 #10
Hopefully, prosecutors recognize any severely biased Trump supporter. LiberalFighter Apr 15 #7
Suggested question to get them to reveal themselves in the voir dire: GopherGal Apr 15 #9
As someone who picks juries from time to time former9thward Apr 15 #11
If you asked me that question, I'd say "I don't care what you call me, especially in the third person" brooklynite Apr 15 #20
Describe in single words only the good things that come into your mind about... JoseBalow Apr 15 #36
Jury nullification has been around for a long, long time. keithbvadu2 Apr 15 #13
Yes it has. And a lot of people who have TheProle Apr 15 #14
The prosecutors are going to be very careful in approving any jurors that might be biased. honest.abe Apr 15 #15
as will the defense... WarGamer Apr 15 #16
No doubt. Thats why it might take awhile to get 12. honest.abe Apr 15 #22
I bet it takes 2 weeks Bucky Apr 15 #26
Prosecutors have a limited number of people they can strike. But, they do not approve jurors 33taw Apr 15 #28
Thank you for the clarification. That's good to know. honest.abe Apr 15 #33
Name a trial in the last 10 years when a RWer has spiked a jury. brooklynite Apr 15 #17
WAPO: How a Trump-supporting juror in the Manafort trial was a beacon of justice emulatorloo Apr 15 #18
Would 10/12 or 11/12 be better? moondust Apr 15 #19
Breaking News: WE are "a deeply polarized tribal society" Bucky Apr 15 #25
There is a much wider questions here dickthegrouch Apr 15 #21
11 jurors voting to convict you is not a good look prodigitalson Apr 15 #23
It's called the Jury System. It is less imperfect than any alternative Bucky Apr 15 #24
No one has mentioned what happens then. Cartoonist Apr 15 #30
I would consider that just as bad as a conviction. LiberalFighter Apr 15 #32
It is possible. But it is also possible the jurors will do their job. LiberalFighter Apr 15 #31
That bothered me too, but I read something satisfying... ecstatic Apr 15 #34

TexasDem69

(1,789 posts)
1. Do you want to change the entire justice system?
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 05:44 PM
Apr 15

Just to ensure a conviction in this case? Why don’t we just skip the trial and declare Trump guilty in that case. No need for the niceties of the Constitution.

marybourg

(12,633 posts)
8. There is no aspect of our civilization
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 06:02 PM
Apr 15

that had not been held up on DU as in need of abolishment since, due to the ignorance of our forebears, it might work to assure fairness or protection even to tRump. Surely that could not be what they intended.

Aristus

(66,397 posts)
2. I agree.
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 05:46 PM
Apr 15

I'm encouraged by the fact, though, that MAGAts are very poor at concealing their feelings and their sense of perpetual grievance. I'm sure if any of them tried to slip past the control safeguards and try on a mask of 'I can be completely objective', voir dir will take care of most of them, and for the rest, there are peremptory challenges.

Bucky

(54,027 posts)
27. I wouldn't depend on comforting stereotypes
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 08:16 PM
Apr 15

Real people are rarely the caricatures we think they are.

jimfields33

(15,832 posts)
3. That's the way the jury works. All 12 could say not guilty or all 12 could say guilty and any numbers in between
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 05:52 PM
Apr 15

They are in charge and see the evidence which we won’t see. Only snippets from media.

gulliver

(13,186 posts)
6. I'm not sure it does Trump any good to have a single Trumpie do a jury nullification
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 05:56 PM
Apr 15

If Trump is acquitted 11-1, it won't look too good for him.

LiberalFighter

(50,953 posts)
10. I agree. There are nuts that will support Trump no matter what.
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 06:05 PM
Apr 15

Of all those of voting age in 2020 Trump received less than 29% of that group.

There will be voters that will be dead before the election.

There will be new voters. Will they more likely for Trump or Biden? I think more will for Biden than the one on trial.

Then there those voting for him in 2020. But will there be drop offs because of various issues? I think so.

LiberalFighter

(50,953 posts)
7. Hopefully, prosecutors recognize any severely biased Trump supporter.
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 05:59 PM
Apr 15

With nearly 85% voting for Biden in 2020 should be a good start.

In Manhattan what type of people live there? What type of occupations? Age brackets? Income level? Education?

It was suggested those in the upper age even if they voted Republican in the past it was Reagan Republican and less likely to support Trump.

GopherGal

(2,008 posts)
9. Suggested question to get them to reveal themselves in the voir dire:
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 06:04 PM
Apr 15

"What pronouns do you use?"

The mere mention of pronouns seems to trigger Trumpsters.

former9thward

(32,028 posts)
11. As someone who picks juries from time to time
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 06:11 PM
Apr 15

most people would have no idea what that question was about. And whoever asked it would have one notch against them.

brooklynite

(94,607 posts)
20. If you asked me that question, I'd say "I don't care what you call me, especially in the third person"
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 07:34 PM
Apr 15

What would that tell you about me and my ability to serve on a jury?

TheProle

(2,179 posts)
14. Yes it has. And a lot of people who have
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 06:29 PM
Apr 15

cheered past jury nullification in the past are probably pretty tightly-puckered right about now...

honest.abe

(8,679 posts)
15. The prosecutors are going to be very careful in approving any jurors that might be biased.
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 06:35 PM
Apr 15

It may take awhile but they will eventually seat 12 reasonable individuals.

Bucky

(54,027 posts)
26. I bet it takes 2 weeks
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 08:13 PM
Apr 15

They're going through over a thousand potential jurors. They new to draw a big summons pool. The judge allowed two weeks for the process, and I'm imagining he knows what he's doing

brooklynite

(94,607 posts)
17. Name a trial in the last 10 years when a RWer has spiked a jury.
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 06:55 PM
Apr 15

Trust the prosecutors to know how to do their jobs.

emulatorloo

(44,133 posts)
18. WAPO: How a Trump-supporting juror in the Manafort trial was a beacon of justice
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 07:20 PM
Apr 15
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-a-trump-supporting-juror-in-the-manafort-trial-was-a-beacon-of-justice/2018/08/25/0bd5064e-a7ca-11e8-97ce-cc9042272f07_story.html

How a Trump-supporting juror in the Manafort trial was a beacon of justice

August 25, 2018 at 6:04 p.m. EDT

ONE OF the jurors from the recently concluded trial of Paul Manafort has described herself as a strong supporter of President Trump. She said she drove every day to the Alexandria courthouse where Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman was being tried with her “Make America Great Again” cap in the back seat, and that she planned to vote again for Mr. Trump if he runs for reelection in 2020. She said she thought prosecutors had targeted Mr. Manafort as a way to get dirt on Mr. Trump, and that she didn’t want Mr. Manafort to be guilty. Nonetheless, she voted to convict him because the evidence of his guilt “was overwhelming.”

SNIP

But what was most instructive — perhaps even inspiring — in Ms. Duncan’s retelling was the seriousness and diligence of the jury in undertaking its responsibilities. It never occurred to Ms. Duncan to try to get out of jury duty; she called it her duty as an American citizen. One juror drove more than 100 miles each day to the federal courthouse. By her account, the panel rigorously considered and applied the evidence. There were “even tears” during the four hard days of deliberations — but politics played no part whatsoever in the jury’s decision.


“I did not want Paul Manafort to be guilty,” she said, “but he was, and no one’s above the law.” That’s another concept the president would do well to familiarize himself with.

moondust

(19,993 posts)
19. Would 10/12 or 11/12 be better?
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 07:29 PM
Apr 15

It would allow for a little bit of monkey business in a deeply polarized tribal society.

Bucky

(54,027 posts)
25. Breaking News: WE are "a deeply polarized tribal society"
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 08:11 PM
Apr 15

I just don't know whether to blame Hunter Biden's laptop or DEI.

dickthegrouch

(3,175 posts)
21. There is a much wider questions here
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 07:43 PM
Apr 15

Other countries have different systems, the UK only requires 9 out of 12 jurors to convict.

But the wider issue is: why do so many seemingly broken legal constructs remain broken for so long?

Even when majorities make wholesale changes possible, they do not occur.

Three examples:
The ability of people with nefarious intent to sue over the injuries they caused themselves that prevented them from completing the crime,
The travesty of ADA suits against any business regardless of whether it is possible to modify the structure to accommodate a disabled person, or whether a disabled person was actually unable to be accommodated,
The use of public money to right wrongs perpetrated by individuals outside of department policy.

All those things could (have) been fixed decades ago if the lawmakers had any will to do so.


(Full disclosure: not one but two of my favorite restaurants were bankrupted by corrupt ADA litigators, who caused them to spend far in excess of any actual damages, trying to remedy the problems of accessibility in very old buildings, multiple times. In each case the City inspector approved the modifications but the ADA litigator managed to hold the business owner to a different standard.
For the record: I don't disagree with the principle of enabling disabled access, I disagree vehemently with it being required regardless of the remediation cost being physically feasible or a substantial proportion of revenue.)

Bucky

(54,027 posts)
24. It's called the Jury System. It is less imperfect than any alternative
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 08:08 PM
Apr 15

That's how it works within the rule of law. We're lucky to have it.

Cartoonist

(7,318 posts)
30. No one has mentioned what happens then.
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 09:44 PM
Apr 15

If the jury is hung, they can just hold another trial. An 11 to 1 vote is NOT an acquittal.

LiberalFighter

(50,953 posts)
31. It is possible. But it is also possible the jurors will do their job.
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 09:52 PM
Apr 15

If these are Manhattan residents. About 85% of the residents voted for Biden.

The job rests with the prosecution to do their job too.
Considering who they have as witnesses and the evidence it should be clear.

But of course, the defense will do everything they can to muck it up.

ecstatic

(32,712 posts)
34. That bothered me too, but I read something satisfying...
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 10:30 PM
Apr 15

Well... not fully satisfying but satisfying enough in light of the circumstances: I checked to see how trumpers were handling the trial, and they were complaining about how tRump might be held from his son's graduation and one of them mentioned that the process is the punishment. 🤔

If nothing else, traitor will be trapped in a court for the next 6 to 8 weeks or so. Hell, I'll take it. I'll take any form of accountability at this point. I'm going to go ahead and set my expectations pretty low so that anything more will be a pleasant surprise. You never know, he might get himself locked up. Or he might... check out... from the stress.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One stinking juror could ...