Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Contract position w/ no benefits vs... (Original Post) Jack_Dawson Dec 2012 OP
Depends on the cash offered former-republican Dec 2012 #1
Depends. Had a couple interesting and lucrative contracts, elleng Dec 2012 #2
If the money's decent, take the contract position. gkhouston Dec 2012 #3
If you contract. lurky Dec 2012 #4
Good advice everyone - thx. Jack_Dawson Dec 2012 #5
I may have a similar choice to make CakeGrrl Dec 2012 #6

elleng

(130,979 posts)
2. Depends. Had a couple interesting and lucrative contracts,
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 12:51 AM
Dec 2012

Need to find permanent how quickly? Ability to continue to look while on contract? Useful for resume? Need for immediate $$$?

gkhouston

(21,642 posts)
3. If the money's decent, take the contract position.
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 12:51 AM
Dec 2012

Although you have less time to look for a job when you're working, a lot of places won't even consider you if you're not employed.

lurky

(2,571 posts)
4. If you contract.
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 01:07 AM
Dec 2012

Are you actually going to buy insurance with the extra money? I definitely wouldn't want to be caught without health insurance these days. That could be a disaster. Find out how much you would actually pay and what you would get.

And remember, you also have to pay double FICA and probably make estimated tax payments every quarter.

Personally, I would be fine with doing contract in the short term while I looked for the right permanent job, but I would be more comfortable with a "permanent" position. And benefits.

Jack_Dawson

(9,196 posts)
5. Good advice everyone - thx.
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:33 AM
Dec 2012

Think I'll take it and keep looking. Not sure what that does to my resume, but guess I'll figure it out later.

CakeGrrl

(10,611 posts)
6. I may have a similar choice to make
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:48 AM
Dec 2012

Really hard to decide, but it always goes back to what are your biggest personal pros and cons.

For me, the FT benefits and relative stability are VERY attractive after a few years of contracting and not knowing where you'll be or how long you'll be in that role, but on the other side of my equation, the work I'd be doing in a new contract role would elevate my game skills-wise, and there's a possibility of becoming FT if I do the job well and the work is there.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Contract position w/ no b...