the names they conjure are usually the OPPOSITE of their intended goals

"Right to Starve" it stinks and it will ruin your state.

Could the phrase right to work be changed to something more accurate sure. It could be called the right to work with fewer rights. Or it could be called the union busting law. Or it could be called the right to make your state much poorer. Or it could be called the right to tank your states economy. There are a whole lot of things it could be called. But, if they gave the law an accurate title it would have no support.

and better wording of the true intention of the law.

Part of destroying their propaganda is to use better wording.

I can't believe the Democrats have let that term stand all these years

. . .and that latter phrase has already been used in history.

In other words, an end run around the 13th Amendment.

Here's how license to enslave works: Underpay your workers, subject them to dangerous working conditions and/or a hostile work environment, and strip them of their constitutional rights, and turn around and call it "at will employment", as long as you're paying them just enough to keep them from killing you and your family.

The right-to-free-load is more accurate.

Right to work is a half-truth. You have a right to work, but not a right to be paid enough to support a family, much less what you're really worth. Nor do you have a right to question the working conditions and/or environment.

In a right-to-work-for-peanuts state, you're an inferior subject to the will and whims of a boss who may or may not think it's good business to invest in one's workers, so you may end up at the mercy of some psycho boss who'll not only fire you for no reason, but also might blacklist you so you'll never be able to work again.

I may be exaggerating in the previous paragraph, but it's to illustrate the point of how license-to-enslave states think so little of labor.

it is "right to work for less"