... is ever having to do any physical labor at all.

does she not want her husband to be "freed"?

Typical Repuke hypocrite.

Republicans across the country are attempting to rob you of opportunity and increase the already enormous profits for their corporate backers, and then they’ll ask you to thank them for it.

Read my post on Michigan's Right to work law

[link:http://unapologeticallyliberal.wordpress.com/2012/12/12/68/|

What kind of last name is this?

I were her.

Using it probably helped get her elected.

Geezus, I can't stand these people with their "fuck you all, but the rules don't apply to me" attitudes.

I'm thinking of the Foxnews stepford wife who was suddenly a champion of maternity leave when she wanted it.

Welcome to DU!

Usually, I am telling them that unfortunately, due to tort reform, they no longer have a claim for what they are seeing me for. They tell me that their case is not like my other cases, theirs is REAL! They think they are "special." Well, I'll tell you this much, they sure are "special" alright! The shock to them to find out that what they thought was true because Governor "Good Hair" Perry, Hannity, or Limpballs said it was turned out to be a lie! Sometimes, well, once in a blue moon, you can see the wheels turn as they start to realize that if this tort reform thing isn't good like they were told it was (it didn't only harm minorities, it got them), then maybe they were lied to about other things.

who love pepper spraying protesters, I have a message- they are coming after your unions next.

That's why they (and some police unions) supported the protests, although they were exempted from Walker's law. (We'll never forget the firefighters' bagpipe band marching through the Capitol rotunda.)

in exchange for their "yes" vote on NAFTA.

These same members went around telling how NAFTA would be a win-win for the U.S. and Mexico. Funny how they really didn't believe it when it came to industry in their districts or state. Otherwise, they would have unconditionally voted for it, right? Had it not been for these cherry-picking deals struck with individual members or blocs of members of Congress, NAFTA would not have passed in the House.

once the the blue & red line find they're getting screwed too....

Posthumus, what a fitting name because thats where the GOP is heading.

Really thats her name???

could not imagine working in.. And many nurses and construction workers sometimes work right along side corrections workers in that same environment... Sounds like this women is suffering from double standards...

I really do not get this idea that certain groups should be exempt from right-to-work laws. So, why should firefighters, police men, and certain other groups be allowed to demand that everyone be in a union and pay union dues, but other groups should not be allowed to do the same? I am not asking this because I support right-to-work laws. I am asking this because Republicans claim their should be right-to-work laws, but those laws should only apply to certain people. I cannot see why right-to-work laws, if they should be enacted, should apply only to certain people.

I really think someone, if no one has already asked the question, should ask Republicans why they think only certain people should be covered by right-to-work laws. Why should someone's occupation determine if they are covered by right-to-work laws? Are Republicans saying only certain people should be allowed to have a middle class life provided by a middle class job?

bitch and her whole hoard. Workers are either freed or fucking not. Did you do the correct thing here to help workers or are you just taking my fucking oxygen? Christ.

then why do they exempt fire and police? Don't they believe that these people, who daily place their lives on the line, deserve to be freed?

Take that you idiot!