General Discussion

Ilsa

(61,695 posts) Wed Dec 12, 2012, 10:38 PM Dec 2012

Once again, TRMS hits hard on issues.

The primary topic being gerrymandering, and the GOP's desire to reallocate presidential electoral votes according to Congressional districts.

She's trying to get the word out about how sinister the GOP's plans are.

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Once again, TRMS hits hard on issues. (Original Post) Ilsa Dec 2012 OP

Take them serious because what you have right now arthritisR_US Dec 2012 #1

She she did and it was devious in nature and horrifying if they succeed. nc4bo Dec 2012 #2

arthritisR_US

(7,288 posts)

1. Take them serious because what you have right now

Reply to Ilsa (Original post)

Wed Dec 12, 2012, 10:54 PM

Dec 2012

in the house and senate is a sham of democracy.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)

2. She she did and it was devious in nature and horrifying if they succeed.

Reply to Ilsa (Original post)

Wed Dec 12, 2012, 10:57 PM

Dec 2012

And they are putting all their pieces into place and the parts ARE ALL WORKING properly and as planned.

She also mentioned Eric Holder's speech - I want to call it a trial balloon of election reform, National Election Standards and an end to partisan gerrymandering.

But Eric Holder made a similar speech before in 2011.

Eric Holder in December, 2011
http://www.justice.gov/iso/opa/ag/speeches/2011/ag-speech-111213.html

So here he is again in 2012.

Eric Holder in December, 2012

http://news.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/12/eric-holder-speech-at-the-john-f-kennedy-presidential-library.php

And since this has absolutely nothing to do with pot, perhaps we have a chance of getting something positive and progressive done. Although seeing the 2011 speech and the full throat assault on America by the GOP gone completely unobstructed in 2012, doesn't leave me feeling overly optimistic.

Perhaps it's time to fire up every method of communication bearing Eric Holder's name?

Email, snail mail, phone calls, petitions, tweets.

,

Reply to this discussion