Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
IMO it is inappropriate for the media to interview the children at the school masscre. (Original Post) LiberalFighter Dec 2012 OP
why ? JI7 Dec 2012 #1
Exploiting children to get a sound bite in unacceptable. Lars39 Dec 2012 #4
ask them if they play make believe shooting video games nt msongs Dec 2012 #2
Sure, that will be helpful. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #12
If they want to and parents don't object, why not? tblue Dec 2012 #3
I don't think their parents are Are_grits_groceries Dec 2012 #9
I totally agree with you thecrow Dec 2012 #24
Or not, given that what ever they say is taped and publc forever. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #14
I agree proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #5
The media has done a lot of inappropriate things in regards to this story. W_HAMILTON Dec 2012 #6
Overstimulation AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #7
To me, it tends to dilute the real depth of this horrific event joe_sixpack Dec 2012 #13
Police need to talk to them immediately after. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #17
Every part of the media spectacle that these events become.... joe_sixpack Dec 2012 #8
Oh believe me I can AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #10
We all should joe_sixpack Dec 2012 #15
I agree. Jamastiene Dec 2012 #11
Yah it seems to me AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #16
That is the same thing I said. No rocket science involved. n/t Jamastiene Dec 2012 #21
Sorry was just agreeing with you AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #23
They'd have to have the consent of the parent/guardian to interview these children. Lone_Star_Dem Dec 2012 #18
I wonder if the parents were even present for some of the interviews.... 2naSalit Dec 2012 #19
Oddly, they may unintentionally make the child conflate the shooting with being famous. nolabear Dec 2012 #20
A reporter I just saw on TV LiberalElite Dec 2012 #22
Thank you ... DakotaLady Dec 2012 #25
Remember a time when you DIDN'T have to explain this $#!% to people ?? eppur_se_muova Dec 2012 #26

Are_grits_groceries

(17,111 posts)
9. I don't think their parents are
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 06:18 PM
Dec 2012

thinking very clearly either. This is a trauma for them too. Approaching people in the middle of a storm in the heart that affects the head is just wrong.

thecrow

(5,519 posts)
24. I totally agree with you
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 06:43 PM
Dec 2012

I am horrified at what passes for journalism. Each station has to have more, more, more at a time when the traumatized just need to be in their own private space to grieve, to console. Reporters don't belong there, asking "how does this make you feel?" They are not qualified. It's unbelievable what lengths they go to to "get a story". I don't want to hear that kind of story. Report the facts and move on. Don't train the cameras on the place and the survivors for hour upon hour. This is horrible. Give the kids and their parents some respect.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
14. Or not, given that what ever they say is taped and publc forever.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 06:22 PM
Dec 2012

There is a reason that "Therapy" is private.

What you descried is "public therapy" ... which means that anything a kid says is public and lives as long as they do.

W_HAMILTON

(7,873 posts)
6. The media has done a lot of inappropriate things in regards to this story.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 06:13 PM
Dec 2012

They should all be held accountable for their shameful actions today. The media hasn't exactly been upstanding in recent years, but today's coverage was downright pathetic. Interviewing kids that survived, misidentifying the shooter, indirectly notifying family/friends that their loved ones had died by rushing to break news and divulging significant information (e.g., saying the shooter's name was Lanza and he targeted his mother and the students in her class at the time). It's just all so despicable. I hope there are some firings after today and the media takes a hard look at what it has become.

 

AldoLeopold

(617 posts)
7. Overstimulation
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 06:15 PM
Dec 2012

I'm not a child shrink, but I don't think its a good idea to interview the kids at the scene. Cause let's see - they just watched a bunch of their friends get killed and here comes a bunch of adults who want them to tell their story on national television?

I'm gonna say that's probably not a good idea.

Maybe in a month, or six months. Or a year - or never. They'll have to tell their stories once to the police. That should be enough for all of us.

joe_sixpack

(721 posts)
13. To me, it tends to dilute the real depth of this horrific event
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 06:21 PM
Dec 2012

As you said, they've been thru some unspeakable tragedy, and yet we tell them to stand here, look this way into this camera and in a ten second sound byte, try to tell us everything you're going through or thinking right now. But make it quick because we're about to cut away to a commercial.....

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
17. Police need to talk to them immediately after.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 06:24 PM
Dec 2012

Parents and the news will change their impressions of what happened very fast. Six months from now, they wil not know what actually happened verses what they think happened now that they talked to mom and dad.

joe_sixpack

(721 posts)
8. Every part of the media spectacle that these events become....
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 06:16 PM
Dec 2012

saddens me. But yet we are the ones that can't turn away.

Jamastiene

(38,187 posts)
11. I agree.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 06:18 PM
Dec 2012

They have just been traumatized. They should only relive such a thing with a qualified mental health professional who can help them cope. I don't think it is a good idea to make them keep talking about it over and over again without finding out what state of mind they are in first, and there is no way of knowing that without having them talk to a grief counselor at least. I know if I had a child and my child went through something like this, I would make sure they made at least one visit to a mental health professional and let them know they can express how they feel and work through it that way safely. I would not want for my kid to bottle it up and not be able to express themselves without someone there who knows how to help them. And I certainly would not want them questioned by some of the worst vultures in MSM.

 

AldoLeopold

(617 posts)
16. Yah it seems to me
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 06:23 PM
Dec 2012

that the first persons they would talk to would be their parents and then a counselor. Not a reporter? How is this rocket science to some of you on this thread?

Lone_Star_Dem

(28,158 posts)
18. They'd have to have the consent of the parent/guardian to interview these children.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 06:27 PM
Dec 2012

What's blowing my mind is that any parent/guardian would even consider letting their child be interviewed directly following such a traumatic event. These kids need hugs, support and love from their family members. Not a bunch of strangers sticking mics in their faces.

2naSalit

(86,777 posts)
19. I wonder if the parents were even present for some of the interviews....
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 06:27 PM
Dec 2012

Some of the children's comments were on the air within minutes and in the mayhem, while parents and officials were still arriving on the scene, the nooz vultures were probably taking advantage of the confusion.

nolabear

(41,991 posts)
20. Oddly, they may unintentionally make the child conflate the shooting with being famous.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 06:28 PM
Dec 2012

I'm not saying anything obvious will come of that (like wanting to be famous through shooting) but it can create some deeply conflicted feelings about being special, being responsible, being overwhelmed, and so forth. Children's minds do NOT work the way adult minds work. They need to be protected, assured, allowed to talk at their own level as long as they need to in an atmosphere of safety and with parents who are also being taken care of.

So yes, I think it's a big mistake to ask them questions, as compelling as that might be.

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
22. A reporter I just saw on TV
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 06:30 PM
Dec 2012

acknowledged that the children shouldn't be interviewed now, but they did say there was a boy who wanted to talk to them, and his interview was broadcast.

DakotaLady

(246 posts)
25. Thank you ...
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 07:23 PM
Dec 2012

... for starting this thread. I'm still hesitant to start a thread myself being a newbie here on DU. So when your thread popped-up knew I had to respond with a post.

I too feel just as you do ... the children at this school do not need to be exploited in this way. EOM

eppur_se_muova

(36,289 posts)
26. Remember a time when you DIDN'T have to explain this $#!% to people ??
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 07:26 PM
Dec 2012

People haven't gotten more stupid. Increasingly, they just get paid more to do the stupid thing than the right thing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»IMO it is inappropriate f...