Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sgent

(5,857 posts)
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 10:53 PM Dec 2012

Do not renew the AWB -- ban semi-automatic weapons

The AWB was a political sideshow that did nothing substantive, but made people fee better. If you actually want to help with gun crime:

1) Implement a gun licensing scheme, requiring a mental health screening, etc. You must then transfer all guns through a FFL who insures the license is still valid.

2) Invalidate any license upon filling a psychotropic drug. The individual can get it reinstated by either showing the drug wasn't for mental health reasons (ie Lamictal for seizures, not for bipolar) or automatically after 2 years of no psychotropic medication. In the case of involuntary commitment or a judgement of mental incapacity, 5 years.

3) Make the gun owner criminally liable for any crime committed with their gun (if its lost, stolen, sold illegally, etc.)

4) Ban semi-automatic pistols and rifles. Notice I never said "assault weapons" or AR-15's, or any thing similar. I want guns that are dangerous banned -- not just ones that look dangerous. This ban may take a while to implement (possibly decades) as I do not advocate knocking on peoples doors.

I would still allow for lever action, bolt action with magazines, revolvers, pump action, and semi-auto shotguns. None of these have the same dangers as a semi-auto pistal / rifle. However, the AWB distinction is useless. My brother's Ruger .223 hunting rifle with a nice walnut stock looks exactly like my grandfathers 30-06, and both of them are functionally equivalent to a AR-15 (well the 30-06 takes a bigger round)

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
1. While I disagree with that, it's a much more sensible idea than another AWB
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 10:55 PM
Dec 2012

And I think we would have a better result if we tried it.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
2. Or at least require a special license to possess these things
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 11:06 PM
Dec 2012

We require a special driving license for over-the=road truck drivers, and they have to be certified at a level far beyond the level expected of normal car drivers. They are also required to maintain detailed logs of their driving.

I see absolutely no reason why we wouldn't expect the same from people who insist on owning these killing machines that really have no valid use in sport.

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
3. #3 is a problem
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 11:06 PM
Dec 2012

Somebody could break into your house while you are away, steal your gun, even if it is packed away properly. Then use the gun a month or two later in another crime. That would be punishing someone for being a crime victim.

Sgent

(5,857 posts)
4. I would make it rebuttable
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 11:13 PM
Dec 2012

not automatic. If you can show the gun was in a safe that was cracked, I wouldn't have a problem. However, if you left it in your nightstand then yes, you should be held responsible at some level.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
8. If the owner did not report it as stolen, then they should have responsibility
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 11:40 PM
Dec 2012

Obviously a court could decide if there were any mitigating factors where the owner might not reasonably be expected to know that the gun had fallen into somebody else's hands. That is what courts do. We have a system for that. It works almost all the time.

And if a person is in possession of a gun not registered to them, they should be heavy penitentiary time. It is outrageous to lock up people for smoking a little weed and not have any real consequences for irresponsible ownership of killing machines.

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
5. Kind of agree. But all drugs, even alcohol impair judgment. Mental health issues must be diagnosed.
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 11:17 PM
Dec 2012

The diagnosing/prescribing doctor must ask if you have a firearms license, just as they must ask if you have a drivers license when you are prescribed medication or diagnosed with a condition that makes it dangerous for you to drive. They communicate their diagnosis to the state who then invalidates the drivers/firearms license.

I disagree with banning semi-autos. I may possibly agree with 10 round magazine limits. It takes a little training to learn to change magazines very quickly. But most criminals and mass killers don't bother to train. You can do a great deal of damage with a drum magazine on a shotgun.

I would suggest banning bullet proof vest sales to civilians. Give leo's and legally armed citizens some kind of leverage.

Pass federal level laws requiring the securing of firearms. This means a safe or other type of locking container. Make it hard for someone to grab your guns and commit crimes. And yes - absolutely - you are responsible for any crimes committed if your guns are grabbed through negligent storage.

Kaleva

(36,312 posts)
6. I'd be fine with such regulations.
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 11:19 PM
Dec 2012

I would also add that before anyone can purchase a gun or ammo, they must first attend a recognized gun safety course.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
10. Absolutely. If we can require government ID for every voter, we surely can register the guns.
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 11:43 PM
Dec 2012

The only exception I'd feel good about would be collectibles that had been permanently prevented from firing.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
12. I have no issue with registration. Not scared of the government knowing I own a gun. But....
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 11:49 PM
Dec 2012

I still do not see the mass shootings ending.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
14. We will not find a single solution that ends all violence forever.
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 11:54 PM
Dec 2012

But we will never get there if our guns remain so wildly out of control. Certainly there are other things we have to address besides the guns.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
13. An excellent example of leaving out the misused terminology
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 11:49 PM
Dec 2012

and still saying exactly what you mean to say.

However, I am not sure what you mean by this:
> lever action, bolt action with magazines, revolvers, pump action, and semi-auto shotguns.
> None of these have the same dangers as a semi-auto pistol / rifle.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do not renew the AWB -- b...