General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhen And How Did The NRA Become So Powerful?......
I'm thinking that the NRA wasn't always a political animal. It seems to me that it transformed into that at some time in its existence. Hence the question - when and how did the NRA become such a powerful lobbying entity?
Initech
(100,081 posts)Reagan used it, Nixon used it, Bush used it, and it worked. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy
Also read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Rifle_Association
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)They were one element of the conservative coalition that swept Reagan into power.
krispos42
(49,445 posts)If you don't own a gun, then you literally have to do absolutely nothing to continue to not own a gun.
If you own a gun, then you have to get politically organized and active in order to keep it from the people that think you should be disarmed.
Kennah
(14,276 posts)OK, yes, that's the law, but there is an exemption in the law for conscientious objectors.
krispos42
(49,445 posts)Well, the exception that proves, the rule, I guess.
I hadn't heard that.
Kennah
(14,276 posts)It was a largely symbolic gesture. There had been a number of Chicago area communities around that time banning handguns.
Mr. Mojo Risen
(104 posts)Kennah
(14,276 posts)Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)That it is Joe Hunter paying their bills.
Fridays Child
(23,998 posts)...all of his riflery patches and pins were issued by the NRA. Beyond the assumption that the organization existed to promote marksmanship skills among scouts and other youth groups, I never gave it another thought. What naivete, eh?
Kennah
(14,276 posts)It was founded by Union military officers because the Confederates shot the shit outta Union soldiers in the Civil War. There was concern that "If we have to do this again" they might want to improve the marksmanship of the citizenry.
Kennah
(14,276 posts)Bush Sr. signed an imported assault weapon ban, and with Clinton's election in 1992 things look bleak for gun rights. Clinton passed an assault weapon ban, and it led to the GOP takeover of the House.
Dubya and Ann Richards weren't far apart on a lot of things when he ran for Governor, but Ann Richards vetoed concealed carry legislation twice when it had passed by something like 62% in the legislature. Dubya as Governor led the way to the White House.
Crime rates have been falling, concealed carry rising, and people have been questioning, "WTF do we accomplish with bans?"
It's a losing issue.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)Not now. In 1994 immigration reform was a losing issue. Not now. Things change.
Kennah
(14,276 posts)TygrBright
(20,762 posts)--as a concatenation of deregulation enabled corporations to inject money into politics for the purpose of protecting and increasing their profits.
The arms industry is hugely profitable. Always has been, which meant they had a ready pool of cash available every time some new bit of deregulation offered an opportunity to buy more legislators, or any time some attempt to regulate their industry or the sale, maintenance, and control of guns threatened their profits.
And the NRA, once a not-terribly-political association of firearms sporting enthusiasts, was ripe for takeover and manipulation as the "grassroots" tool of the arms industry, offering their bought-and-paid-for legislators the figleaf of "popular support" to protect the industry's profits.
helpfully,
Bright
Paladin
(28,264 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)the irony of gun control in America was that it's biggest victory laid the foundation for it's destruction.
The AWB was the greatest gift the NRA ever got.