Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 06:57 AM Dec 2012

A history of the Second Amendment in two paintings

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/12/15/a-history-of-the-second-amendment-in-two-paintings/?tid=pm_business_pop

“Are you at a computer?” asked Akhil Reed Amar, a professor at Yale Law School. I had called him because we had been scheduled to talk about the constitutionality of the filibuster. But just a few hours before our call, a madman had killed 26 people, mostly children, at a Connecticut elementary school. Neither of us was very interested in talking about the filibuster. So I asked Amar, one of the nation’s leading authorities on the Constitution, about the Second Amendment. That’s when he sent me to Google.

“Okay. Good. Go type in ‘John Trumbull’ — that’s T-R-U-M-B-U-L-L — and ‘death of General Warren’ in Google image search,” Amar continued. “Do you see the picture?”


John Trumbull’s ‘Death of General Warren at Bunker Hill’.

***SNIP

“Now go type in ‘Freedmen’s Bureau.’ Do you see it?”



“The militia men have become klansmen. The uniforms have come off. In the original, very far corner of the screen, right hand of the page, is one black person. Now there are lots of black people. Now there’s a uniformed officer keeping law and order. But as soon as the army goes, these blacks will be vulnerable. They’ll at least need these bayonets in their homes or they’ll be terrorized.”
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
1. The 2nd should of been worded different ' The right to impose Death ' maybe
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:13 AM
Dec 2012

it would of made clear the concept of protection , as opposed to a responsibility not to victimize or subjugate .

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
2. If no guns were in the street, period, how would they be terrorized in their homes? Sorry, NO GO
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:25 AM
Dec 2012

this is the type of gotcha Sean Hannity does and fails at every single time he does it

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
4. *if* the effect of a ban were no guns in the street, period....
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 09:03 AM
Dec 2012

But we don't have a history of being able to actually ban things people want, or even make them particularly uncommon. Hell, a majority of people my age smoke cannabis.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
5. Guns outside of a "well-regulated militia" leaves us with an armed terrorist mob.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 09:20 AM
Dec 2012

And necessitates that the people live in fear for their lives.

This is the same old RW NRA spin: the only answer the good professor offers is to inject more guns into an already dangerous situation. That way madness lies.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A history of the Second A...