Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA history of the Second Amendment in two paintings
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/12/15/a-history-of-the-second-amendment-in-two-paintings/?tid=pm_business_popAre you at a computer? asked Akhil Reed Amar, a professor at Yale Law School. I had called him because we had been scheduled to talk about the constitutionality of the filibuster. But just a few hours before our call, a madman had killed 26 people, mostly children, at a Connecticut elementary school. Neither of us was very interested in talking about the filibuster. So I asked Amar, one of the nations leading authorities on the Constitution, about the Second Amendment. Thats when he sent me to Google.
Okay. Good. Go type in John Trumbull thats T-R-U-M-B-U-L-L and death of General Warren in Google image search, Amar continued. Do you see the picture?
John Trumbulls Death of General Warren at Bunker Hill.
***SNIP
Now go type in Freedmens Bureau. Do you see it?
The militia men have become klansmen. The uniforms have come off. In the original, very far corner of the screen, right hand of the page, is one black person. Now there are lots of black people. Now theres a uniformed officer keeping law and order. But as soon as the army goes, these blacks will be vulnerable. Theyll at least need these bayonets in their homes or theyll be terrorized.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1861 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A history of the Second Amendment in two paintings (Original Post)
xchrom
Dec 2012
OP
The 2nd should of been worded different ' The right to impose Death ' maybe
orpupilofnature57
Dec 2012
#1
If no guns were in the street, period, how would they be terrorized in their homes? Sorry, NO GO
graham4anything
Dec 2012
#2
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)1. The 2nd should of been worded different ' The right to impose Death ' maybe
it would of made clear the concept of protection , as opposed to a responsibility not to victimize or subjugate .
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)2. If no guns were in the street, period, how would they be terrorized in their homes? Sorry, NO GO
this is the type of gotcha Sean Hannity does and fails at every single time he does it
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)3. Because he's an ambiguous asshole .
Recursion
(56,582 posts)4. *if* the effect of a ban were no guns in the street, period....
But we don't have a history of being able to actually ban things people want, or even make them particularly uncommon. Hell, a majority of people my age smoke cannabis.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)5. Guns outside of a "well-regulated militia" leaves us with an armed terrorist mob.
And necessitates that the people live in fear for their lives.
This is the same old RW NRA spin: the only answer the good professor offers is to inject more guns into an already dangerous situation. That way madness lies.