MAKING GUN CONTROL HAPPEN
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2012/12/making-gun-control-happen.html
Do you feel that? Thats your sense of moral outrage dissipating.
It may still feel raw and vivid in the wake of Fridays bloodbath in Connecticut. But if other recent massacres are anything to go by, our collective indignation has a half-lifeand it isnt long. The tender ages of the victims at Sandy Hook made the tragedy feel exceptional, and on television and Twitter, and at kitchen tables around the country, many of us expressed an urgent sense, over the past forty-eight hours, that something should be done. Even President Obama suggested that meaningful action is in order, though he didnt elaborate on what that might entail, and notably absent from his remarks was the single monosyllable that might explain how one disturbed young man could walk into an elementary school and end twenty-six lives in a matter of minutes: gun.
One irony of the pernicious taboo on politicizing a tragedy is that in some especially thorny areas of policylike, for instance, gun controlit is only a tragedy that can summon the political momentum for change. The original Gun Control Act passed in October 1968, following the demoralizing assassinations of Bobby Kennedy and Martin Luther King. The Brady Act owes its existence to the unsuccessful attempt on the life of Ronald Reagan.
But by 2011, when Gabrielle Giffords narrowly survived a bullet in the head, the dynamic of the debate had changed. After the Giffords shooting, I thought something would happen with gun control, a recently retired official from the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms told me last summer. But nothing did. Apparently, a member of Congress doesnt count, he said. So now Im wondering, what exactly does it take? Another presidential assassination?
Read more:
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2012/12/making-gun-control-happen.html#ixzz2FDJXvHRe