General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTexas would be on the table if Newt was the nominee
PPP has Obama up 47%-45% over Newt in Texas. Mind you, if Obama chooses to not campaign there, I'm sure he'll lose it. He'd have to fight hard for it, and be willing to spend some money and do some visits (and NOT just to Austin, either).
The poll:
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_TX_0118.pdf
lacrew
(283 posts)Newt probably has never even run a tv ad in Texas...he will, and the matchup poll will become more meaningful. Gingrich will win the primary there, and will immediately poll 10 points ahead of Obama. I'm sure Obama will run a campaign there....but he will devote time and resources to much more likely wins.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)But Newt won't be the nominee.
Eid Ma Clack Shaw
(490 posts)landslide. A little bit better / worse than 2008, but in the same area.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)If the interim redistricting maps aren't settled soon the primary could move again.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,492 posts)blogslut
(38,017 posts)However, I think this year might be different. In my opinion, Romney will undoubtedly be the GOP candidate and there will be swarms of dejected Texas conservatives who will stay home in November.
Remember, it was not John McCain who won the 2008 TX GOP primary, it was Huckabee. Our wingnuts aren't fond of perceived moderates.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)Well knock me down and fuck me sideways. I didn't look it up, but got two replies saying that (so I'll assume you're right). WTF was up with that? Weird.
blogslut
(38,017 posts)Note the comparison of republican turnout 2004-to-2008. Kerry lost by almost two million. Obama lost by less than one million. Texas wingnuts did not like McCain. They will not like Mitt Romney.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,492 posts)note that back then, Mr. Texas Jim Wright (gosh I had forgotten about that guy) was the House Majority Leader during Carter's first term (and he eventually became Speaker).
Before that, TX had voted Democrat in the 1968 election probably as a nod to the "native son" Texan Johnson.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Strategy didn't work.
The South voted for Clinton (maybe not Texas, but many Southern states did).
The South didn't go GOP until 1994. So, if it took 20+ years to work, the Southern Strategy wasn't very effective, was it? Personally, I think it was the rise of Faux News that worked on the South - not Nixon.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)and I think he also went elsewhere. He got some big money from TX. He won Dallas County in the GE.
TX has a large minority population, which votes primarily Democratic, although they are concentrated in a few areas. However, the Republican TX legislature has just redrawn the districts to spread out the minority populations, so Democrats won't win districts. It's in the Courts right now, so we'll see. I suspect they'll win. That's one of the consequences for a party being in power...ability to redraw districts in weird, nonsensical ways purely for political gain.