Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cal04

(41,505 posts)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 11:12 AM Dec 2012

Gov. Malloy Sees Potential Loopholes In State Assault Weapons Bans. Wants tougher fed. laws

Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy (D) said that the attack on Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., was carried out with an assault weapon despite the state's "aggressive" gun laws, during an interview that aired on CNN's "State of the Union" Sunday. Malloy argued that manufacturers could potentially get around state assault weapon laws because of an absence of federal legislation.

"Connecticut has a pretty aggressive law -- probably of the 50 states I think we're ranked 4th most aggressive in trying to limit access to these kinds of weapons," Malloy said. "But what happens in the absence of a Brady bill, in the absence of federal legislation, people use descriptive terms to try to get around the limitations that are built into our statutes here in Connecticut, or might otherwise not happen if we had federal legislation on this issue. These are assault weapons. You don't hunt deer with these things."

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/gov-malloy-sees-potential-loopholes-in-state-assault

Connecticut governor wants tougher federal laws
Two days after telling more than 20 families they had lost loved ones in one of the nation's deadliest school shootings, Connecticut Gov. Dan Malloy on Sunday urged stricter gun control legislation at the federal level.

"These are assault weapons. You don't hunt deer with these things," Malloy said on CNN's "State of the Union." "I think that's the question that a lot of people are going to have to resolve in their own minds: Where should this line get drawn?"

(snip)
The Democratic governor pointed to Connecticut's assault weapons ban but argued the lack of a similar law at the federal level makes it difficult to keep such weapons out of the state. He said manufacturers can use "descriptive terms to try to get around the limitations that are built into our statutes here in Connecticut" and added that many guns found in the state had been tracked from gun shows in other parts of the country.

"One can only hope that we'll find a way to limit these weapons that really only have one purpose," he told CNN chief political correspondent Candy Crowley.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/12/16/connecticut-governor-wants-tougher-federal-laws/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gov. Malloy Sees Potential Loopholes In State Assault Weapons Bans. Wants tougher fed. laws (Original Post) cal04 Dec 2012 OP
reframe the issue and toss all old thoughts about guns pro/con into the delete box. graham4anything Dec 2012 #1
Gun control should be a federal issue anyway. AngryOldDem Dec 2012 #2

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
2. Gun control should be a federal issue anyway.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 11:26 AM
Dec 2012

Reinstate the assault weapons ban, for starters.

I think, too, that if we're not going to curtail gun sales, gun shows, etc., then we tax the living hell out of the weapons and their ammunition, with the revenue going straight to law enforcement so that they can provide adequate protection from these weapons, especially at schools.

No civilian needs a Glock, Sig Sauer, or Bushwacker for protection, hunting, target practice, what-have-you. And no on will convince me otherwise.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gov. Malloy Sees Potentia...