Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
108 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
All 31 pro-gun rights Senators decline invites to Meet The Press (Original Post) KeepItReal Dec 2012 OP
So they memorized the Chinese knife story for nothing jsr Dec 2012 #1
LMAO. Gotta remember that one when I get around those who live for guns. Hoyt Dec 2012 #57
That means reason is winning the debate. This is good news. tridim Dec 2012 #2
Much as I would like to agree with you, I actually do not think 'reason' coalition_unwilling Dec 2012 #77
Cowards. No wonder they feel the need to hide behind their guns... Cooley Hurd Dec 2012 #3
I see you (rightfully) left out "...and religion" at the end of that sentence. George II Dec 2012 #12
George, that is an unnecessarily bigoted statement. nt humblebum Dec 2012 #43
W H A T ? ? ? ? George II Dec 2012 #44
If I misread your meaning I apologize, but I see no need to bring religion into this matter. nt humblebum Dec 2012 #48
The post that I originally responded to, I believe, was a take-off on........ George II Dec 2012 #52
unnecessarily bigoted statement. AlbertCat Dec 2012 #53
The quote you refer to there I never made, however if someone associates humblebum Dec 2012 #60
Your anti-religious rhetoric is well known. AlbertCat Dec 2012 #61
"Your anti-religious rhetoric is well known." humblebum Dec 2012 #62
The bottom line is....... George II Dec 2012 #63
Yeah, I got that.. Cha Dec 2012 #64
yep heaven05 Dec 2012 #66
It'll be interesting to find out the shooter's religious affiliation, if any? humblebum Dec 2012 #71
most heaven05 Dec 2012 #75
We're not F-ing talking about the shooter in this thread, we're talking about.......... George II Dec 2012 #83
My patience started waning when you drug religion into the conversation. nt humblebum Dec 2012 #89
I didn't "drug" religion into the conversation - can't you read what I said????????????? George II Dec 2012 #91
No but you certainly dragged it into the conversation, intentionally or not. nt humblebum Dec 2012 #92
You're hopeless...you refuse to follow and read the thread - please stop replying to me. George II Dec 2012 #93
Sorry, responded to the wrong post, one can lose track when angry with people around here... George II Dec 2012 #84
You stonecutter357 Dec 2012 #54
I'm not surprised that the biggest gun rights sufrommich Dec 2012 #4
It's in the Job Description. These 31 should be barred for the next year. They seem to byeya Dec 2012 #49
Tough to create talking points MuseRider Dec 2012 #5
Gee, what a fucking shock...NOT. n/t Hepburn Dec 2012 #6
Chickenshits. (nt) Paladin Dec 2012 #7
Fucking cowards. Warren Stupidity Dec 2012 #8
+1000 baldguy Dec 2012 #15
Cowards hiding in shame. morningfog Dec 2012 #9
If they had any shame they would have a conscience. SummerSnow Dec 2012 #90
Fucking cowards, the teeny weenie brigade arthritisR_US Dec 2012 #10
Classic. They will wait until the smoke clears then start in with the latest NRA talking points. geckosfeet Dec 2012 #11
Like a proposal to strengthen the law on brass knuckles and nunchucks jsr Dec 2012 #13
No surprise here........ Swede Atlanta Dec 2012 #14
O...M...G! They're fucking chicken. SoapBox Dec 2012 #16
Of course not. The bastards are hiding. nt Sarah Ibarruri Dec 2012 #17
They really take that, "now is not the time" meme to heart. progressoid Dec 2012 #18
They're waiting and/or memorizing the NRA talking points lunatica Dec 2012 #19
Cowards, every damned one of them. nt Hekate Dec 2012 #20
It's too soon to talk about it... Raine1967 Dec 2012 #21
I think you're probably right NewJeffCT Dec 2012 #24
and Fox marions ghost Dec 2012 #29
Only 31 senators are pro-gun? NewJeffCT Dec 2012 #22
are there really only 31 of them? Beaverhausen Dec 2012 #23
They wouldn't dare - AnnieK401 Dec 2012 #25
Hate Radio hasn't told them what to say yet Doctor_J Dec 2012 #26
Is there a compiled list of the "Gang of 31"? n/t fredamae Dec 2012 #27
Republican Chickenhawks Berlum Dec 2012 #28
Scum. n/t ellisonz Dec 2012 #30
I don't give a shit about that , we don't need gotcha games right now by talking heads in the MSM former-republican Dec 2012 #31
And that proves the anti-gun crowd's point. Zoeisright Dec 2012 #32
Pass law REQUIRING Gun Ownership HockeyMom Dec 2012 #33
The nra Badger1 Dec 2012 #34
They need more time for the media to write... Cerridwen Dec 2012 #35
I heaven05 Dec 2012 #67
I'm shocked, SHOCKED truebluegreen Dec 2012 #36
Heartless cowards. ailsagirl Dec 2012 #37
COWARDS. nolabear Dec 2012 #38
Six BRAVE WOMEN lost their lives protecting BABIES Tsiyu Dec 2012 #39
+1 sheshe2 Dec 2012 #78
Invite Grover Nordquist Tutonic Dec 2012 #40
As an NRA Board Member they could ask him about love for guns and taxing the rich. Hoyt Dec 2012 #59
Three Hundred Million guns in America: The Genie will not go back into the bottle panzerfaust Dec 2012 #41
Thank you for being one of billh58 Dec 2012 #56
This message was self-deleted by its author heaven05 Dec 2012 #68
very reasoned response. grantcart Dec 2012 #97
Nah, these 31ers are regrouping and being brief on Iliyah Dec 2012 #42
Link: 2012 NRA to Lawmaker Contribution Cycle fredamae Dec 2012 #45
Again. It's okay for first-graders to face being shot to death every day, but these fuckwads Chorophyll Dec 2012 #46
When Gun Apologists and Gun Owners Are On The Wrong Side Of An Issue There Is No Defense cantbeserious Dec 2012 #47
These 31 chickenshits are probably chickenhawks too ReRe Dec 2012 #50
No gun reform will get through the next Congress. Have to wait for voters to vote them out. RickFromMN Dec 2012 #51
That seems cowardly. If you believe in something, and you're a public official, ZombieHorde Dec 2012 #55
Just curious, what is the stand on the issue of abortion of the 31 pro-gun Senators? Thinkingabout Dec 2012 #58
It certainly wouldn't surprise me if all were on the forced birth side Major Nikon Dec 2012 #69
They seem to run together. I wonder if they applied the same thoughts to DR. killed in church. Thinkingabout Dec 2012 #72
Damn! heaven05 Dec 2012 #65
Who are these Senators? Lasher Dec 2012 #70
I want to know, too. Rhiannon12866 Dec 2012 #86
Just 31? alp227 Dec 2012 #106
May be from the 31 Senators NRA got to vote against Sotomayer 66 dmhlt Dec 2012 #108
Cowards!! n/t Flatpicker Dec 2012 #73
They weaseled out. lpbk2713 Dec 2012 #74
Too busy posting in the gungeon? aandegoons Dec 2012 #76
Surprise, surprise NOT! eom southern_belle Dec 2012 #79
They're posting here instead michigandem58 Dec 2012 #80
Cowards. They should have shown up with their shoulder holsters showing, kestrel91316 Dec 2012 #81
Well and wouldn't you guess the next two Sunday's fall right before holidays davidpdx Dec 2012 #82
31 sacks of shit Blue Owl Dec 2012 #85
"It's too soon." nt DCKit Dec 2012 #87
After all the Pro Gun rhetoric zebrastripe Dec 2012 #88
Maybe they should show in camoflage like all the cowards who ravage our friends and family. VPStoltz Dec 2012 #94
COWARDS! Eric the Reddish Dec 2012 #95
NRA endorsed politicians at the link I think, but requires membership yends21012 Dec 2012 #96
I am betting that the majority of the 31 Stewland Dec 2012 #98
Aren't there more than 31 pro-gun senators? NewJeffCT Dec 2012 #99
Freaking cowards. Probably all have small dicks too. catbyte Dec 2012 #100
Bahk bahk bahk! Was all that the chickens said. DCofVA Dec 2012 #101
The fucking cowards know they are wrong workinclasszero Dec 2012 #102
Names, please? efhmc Dec 2012 #103
but they cashed the checks sent by the NRA. spanone Dec 2012 #104
Psss psss psss psss psss!! Meow meow! DinahMoeHum Dec 2012 #105
Buncha cowards imo. nt cstanleytech Dec 2012 #107
 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
77. Much as I would like to agree with you, I actually do not think 'reason'
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:49 PM
Dec 2012

is winning the debate. Most Americans are probably still completely unaware that the presence of a firearm in their residence exponentially increases the odds that they will fall victim to gun violence of one sort or another. The actuarial tables DO NOT lie.

I do think 'shame' may be winning the debate, as well it should. And I look forward to the day in the not-so-distant future when 'reason' will have a decent chance against the demagogues and charlatans.

George II

(67,782 posts)
52. The post that I originally responded to, I believe, was a take-off on........
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:35 PM
Dec 2012

....Obama's 2008 campaign comment about middle-America "hiding behind their guns and their religion". The post only said that the gutless guns-rights senators were hiding behind their guns, my comment hinted that they don't have any religion to hide behind - these guns-rights wackos are God-less.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
53. unnecessarily bigoted statement.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:37 PM
Dec 2012

And this is your usual unnecessary "poor put upon religionists" accusation.

Always stirring the pot... keeping a keen eye out for any excuse to show how superior and "fair" you most "humbly" are.

 

humblebum

(5,881 posts)
60. The quote you refer to there I never made, however if someone associates
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:47 PM
Dec 2012

religious affiliation with those shootings, they would definitely be out of line. If you have a problem with that, I don't really care. Your anti-religious rhetoric is well known.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
61. Your anti-religious rhetoric is well known.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:57 PM
Dec 2012

You mean my anti-"religion gets a special pass on criticism" rhetoric. Get it straight!

 

humblebum

(5,881 posts)
62. "Your anti-religious rhetoric is well known."
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:01 PM
Dec 2012

Quotation marks generally go with direct quotations - get it straight. And I make no apology for such a statement.

George II

(67,782 posts)
63. The bottom line is.......
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:34 PM
Dec 2012

.....MY statement which started this brouhaha, was NOT" an unnecessarily bigoted statement"!

 

humblebum

(5,881 posts)
71. It'll be interesting to find out the shooter's religious affiliation, if any?
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 06:48 PM
Dec 2012

Who knows, he might be an atheist like Gabby Gifford's attacker. But what that has to do with gun control I have no idea.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
75. most
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:46 PM
Dec 2012

rabid right wingers are christians and gun obsessed and gun control might shut some of them down?

George II

(67,782 posts)
83. We're not F-ing talking about the shooter in this thread, we're talking about..........
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 08:45 PM
Dec 2012

......the 31 pro-gun Senators who were too gutless to show their faces on national television this morning.

If you want to delve into the religion of the shooter, START YOUR OWN FUCKING THREAD!!!

I was polite in my first response to you, but my patience with you is growing very thin.

......................

George II

(67,782 posts)
84. Sorry, responded to the wrong post, one can lose track when angry with people around here...
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 08:46 PM
Dec 2012

...meant to respond to Stumblebum.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
4. I'm not surprised that the biggest gun rights
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 11:44 AM
Dec 2012

blowhards are also cowards.It seems to go with the territory.

 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
49. It's in the Job Description. These 31 should be barred for the next year. They seem to
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:18 PM
Dec 2012

show up to slag off on Pres. Obama but can't handle the results of their vile panderings.

MuseRider

(34,111 posts)
5. Tough to create talking points
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 11:49 AM
Dec 2012

when something like this happens. Next weekend they will be ready. IF we are still talking about this they will be out there.

arthritisR_US

(7,288 posts)
10. Fucking cowards, the teeny weenie brigade
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 11:53 AM
Dec 2012

shrivels yet again. They know they can't defend the indefensible!

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
14. No surprise here........
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 12:18 PM
Dec 2012

These men and women are the true cowards. I believe they are of two types. They are ones that really don't believe what they say but see the love of the gun as a path to certain conservative voters. Or they are ones that place the love of the gun above their love of money (maybe), love of God, love of life.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
16. O...M...G! They're fucking chicken.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 12:46 PM
Dec 2012

They are oh so tough with their guns but hide out when America wants answers!

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
24. I think you're probably right
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:13 PM
Dec 2012

The NRA, Frank Luntz and a few others are still in the process of focus-group testing the right talking points.

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
29. and Fox
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:25 PM
Dec 2012

Murdoch's statement--how much weight does it carry?

Right, honing the talking points this week.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
22. Only 31 senators are pro-gun?
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:12 PM
Dec 2012

that seems awfully low, since we know Democrats like Tester & Baucus are pro-gun.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
26. Hate Radio hasn't told them what to say yet
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:21 PM
Dec 2012

by sundown tomorrow they'll have their story straight and it will be safe to appear in public again. All of the Limbeciles, including all Repuke legislators at all levels, will be reciting the same bullshit.

 

former-republican

(2,163 posts)
31. I don't give a shit about that , we don't need gotcha games right now by talking heads in the MSM
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:29 PM
Dec 2012

I want the President to lead in this.
He needs to call both houses and all governors together.

The President said he needs to start a dialog , that's the way to do it

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
33. Pass law REQUIRING Gun Ownership
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:31 PM
Dec 2012

All school staff must take gun courses and carry guns to school.

Didn't a few on here even suggest that? I hear it all the time about the little town where all adults are required to own guns.

As I said my husband, that gun can sit and rust in a safe too.

Cerridwen

(13,258 posts)
35. They need more time for the media to write...
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:35 PM
Dec 2012

They need more time for the media to write the narrative that will help them distance themselves from the issue.

Right now it looks as though the narrative is going to be about how the guilty, victim, mom was a "nutty" survivalist whom the shooter son hated for not showing him enough love as she spent more time with those children than him and it can all be explained away as just another poor, unloved son who "snapped" and reacted the way his "nutty" survivalist mom "made" him.

See? It's not about guns at all.

At least, that's how it looks from reading DU. I may have missed some other points in the messed up "reporting" going on.



Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
39. Six BRAVE WOMEN lost their lives protecting BABIES
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:43 PM
Dec 2012

and 20 babies still died.


These cowards wouldn't do what those women did; they can't even show their faces.

Cowardly SCUM - all of them.





 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
59. As an NRA Board Member they could ask him about love for guns and taxing the rich.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:43 PM
Dec 2012

These right wing hacks are into every area of our society.
 

panzerfaust

(2,818 posts)
41. Three Hundred Million guns in America: The Genie will not go back into the bottle
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:53 PM
Dec 2012

I belonged to the NRA until they became NARA (National Assault Rifle Ass) and switched from being about hunting, recreational shooting and gun safety to being a strident branch of the the John Birch Society.

I still enjoy shooting - though not hunting - and have over half-a-dozen firearms.

However there is absolutely no reason for anyone, other than the military and perhaps the police (though the distinction between the two - as in any Police State - is blurring with the increasing militarization of the police) to have assault weapons.

Yes, doubtless some gun-obsessed 'expert' will quickly pop-up from under a rock to insist that "assault weapon" is a meaningless term - but anyone with common sense can understand the difference between a firearm designed for hunting from that designed to kill, as quickly as possible, large numbers of people.

However, as usual, nothing will change - for, as the president's PR flack said (as he said after Aurora) "There will be a day for discussion of the usual Washington policy debates, but I do not think today is that day."

That day will never come.

Frankly, given the number assault weapons and other firearms already out there I fear it is is too late.

billh58

(6,635 posts)
56. Thank you for being one of
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:39 PM
Dec 2012

the many responsible gun owners. I would just like to point out however that you have illustrated that the problem may not be as complicated as many believe: you own several guns, and so do most other gun owners.

That 300 million guns in America are estimated to owned by around 80 million Americans, so it's not like every American has a gun. Every automobile in the USA is registered, so why would it be a problem to make the registration of every firearm in the USA mandatory? That would at least be a start, and we would then have a database to work from for comparisons against other key information (restraining orders, arrests, transfers, sales, etc.).

The 2nd Amendment does not prohibit regulation and tracking of firearms, and does not give anyone absolute immunity from meeting legislated standards for ownership and use. The NRA, through politics and misinformation, has attempted to turn the 2nd Amendment into something it was never intended to be: an absolute right.

Response to billh58 (Reply #56)

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
42. Nah, these 31ers are regrouping and being brief on
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:54 PM
Dec 2012

the talking points which will come out when ALEC, NRA, Koch Brothers, etc. let them to talk all in chord-rest, but I can image this:
1. Obama want to take your guns away; 2. Its Obama fault; 3. Obama orchestrated this so he can take your guns away; 4. GOP's GAWD want every classroom, , and all public and homes to have multiple guns, assault weapons, brenades, bomb making materials, armored anything because the government want to take your guns away and stomp on your 2nd Amendment rights; 5. their GAWD said armed yourselves because Obama is coming for your right to own guns; 6. their GAWD told them that since prayer was taking out of the schools innocent children MUST die, it his will; 7. Americans must be fully armed to kill off Muslims and any other non-Christian believers, et al.,

Chorophyll

(5,179 posts)
46. Again. It's okay for first-graders to face being shot to death every day, but these fuckwads
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:14 PM
Dec 2012

are too scared to go on the teevee?

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
50. These 31 chickenshits are probably chickenhawks too
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:18 PM
Dec 2012
K&R

Yeah, had they been there, they would have hid in a closet by themselves. They've had 2 days to get their talking points together. I bet the reason they didn't show up is that the gun lobby told them to keep their traps shut. Can't wait to hear what they finally come up with. Whatever it is, it will be the wrong thing.

RickFromMN

(478 posts)
51. No gun reform will get through the next Congress. Have to wait for voters to vote them out.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:33 PM
Dec 2012

Sadly, the voters won't remember unless a political ad agency can create some really poignant ads.

When this happens the Republicans will cry foul.
They will say they didn't pull the trigger.
They will say they are not responsible.
Sadly, a number of voters will believe them.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
55. That seems cowardly. If you believe in something, and you're a public official,
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:38 PM
Dec 2012

you should be willing to defend your position.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
58. Just curious, what is the stand on the issue of abortion of the 31 pro-gun Senators?
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:42 PM
Dec 2012

This is going to be a hard fight but lives stolen by useless violence has to stop. The value of life is very low.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
72. They seem to run together. I wonder if they applied the same thoughts to DR. killed in church.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 06:59 PM
Dec 2012

If the school killings was because Prayer has been removed from school has prayer also been removed from churches and the dr was killed.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
65. Damn!
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:51 PM
Dec 2012

I wonder why? jerks, cowards aholes without courage to stand up for their conviction. No wonder our country is so f'd up!

66 dmhlt

(1,941 posts)
108. May be from the 31 Senators NRA got to vote against Sotomayer
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:18 AM
Dec 2012
http://www.examiner.com/article/sotomayor-supreme-court-confirmation-divides-pro-gun-senators

It lists the roll call vote.
But you have to be an NRA member to actually view a list of how the NRA rates Senators.

Guns of America (GOA) also rates Senators - and it's transparent:

http://gunowners.org/113srat.htm

lpbk2713

(42,759 posts)
74. They weaseled out.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:03 PM
Dec 2012



They feel much safer appearing on Faux where they can
feel more comfortable about having a script to follow.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
81. Cowards. They should have shown up with their shoulder holsters showing,
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 08:08 PM
Dec 2012

loaded for bear.

I guess maybe they are not so proud of their toys after all.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
82. Well and wouldn't you guess the next two Sunday's fall right before holidays
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 08:21 PM
Dec 2012

So the news will either revert to the budget hostage situation or everyone being out of town. Mid-next month they'll come out of the woodwork like termites in a tree.

zebrastripe

(26 posts)
88. After all the Pro Gun rhetoric
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 10:27 PM
Dec 2012

why will they not take the opportunity to defend their ideals if they are so superior?

 

Stewland

(163 posts)
98. I am betting that the majority of the 31
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 09:08 AM
Dec 2012

And prey tell, how many of the Senators belong to the Republican Party ? My gun loving NRA
Uncle voted straight republican ticket. Hewas a school teacher too. Forced to retire due to heart problems and high blood pressure. This man got into teaching not for the love of kids but for he decent pay and time off. His attitude was that he should of had a 2 by4 in order to get the students attention. It is said that one catches more flys with honey rather than vinegar. He might of had greater success if he had taken that attitude. His whole attitude towards students reflects why immature people should not be given free access to guns.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
99. Aren't there more than 31 pro-gun senators?
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 09:11 AM
Dec 2012

If less than 1/3 are pro-gun, why has it been so tough to enact tougher gun laws? I can't imagine the percentage in the House would be that different, and Democrats had a majority from 2006-2010.

DCofVA

(714 posts)
101. Bahk bahk bahk! Was all that the chickens said.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 09:44 AM
Dec 2012

I know...I know, I'm insulting chickens.
Actually my chickens are much braver than any NRA member or gun proponent.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
102. The fucking cowards know they are wrong
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 10:18 AM
Dec 2012

They trade gun lobby $$$ for the lives of children!

The NRA, Gun Owner's of America, etc are the terrorist arm of the teabag republican party!

Lets see that pig Ted Nugent get up on his hind legs on Meet the Press and explain why its more important that all insane whack jobs must have the right to military weapons of mass destruction no matter how many little children have to DIE for it!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»All 31 pro-gun rights Sen...