Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
12. They still have yields in the 10s-100s of kilotons. It's not like the movies. They are
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 08:07 PM
Dec 2012

big time nukes. Bigger than used on Japan.

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
3. So they'll flatten it first.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:51 PM
Dec 2012

Nukes, conventional air strikes and artillery do that very efficiently.

Those popguns are not going to do anyone much good.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
4. Because that's such a realistic threat
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:52 PM
Dec 2012

I'm sure the Chinese are just itching to invade their biggest customers, or the Russians have developed some new hobbies besides kleptomania and food insecurity.

 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
8. You Are Most Likely Right ---- I Was Being A Little Facetious ---
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:55 PM
Dec 2012

because the stats are so staggering. They are probably smart enough to let us do ourselves in.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
19. Yep. And a lot of good those guns will do...
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 10:01 PM
Dec 2012

...when food prices are astronomical and rationing is in place.

People will use them to survive (naturally).

The unarmed countries would at least be able to squash rebellions.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
6. There are other more effective and efficient ways of doing things in an invasion.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:55 PM
Dec 2012

Just another excuse for people who have a fetish for portable, easily obtained mass-killing mechanisms.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
7. Bullshit. 99% of gun owners have no idea how to fight cops, much less troops.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:55 PM
Dec 2012

They would wet their pants and hide.

Ghost in the Machine

(14,912 posts)
11. What percentage of gun owners do you think are active or former cops/troops??
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 08:05 PM
Dec 2012
Bullshit. 99% of gun owners have no idea how to fight cops, much less troops.

They would wet their pants and hide.



I think you're confusing gun owners and pacifists.... and possibly projecting....

Turbineguy

(37,343 posts)
9. If we keep on killing eachother at this rate they won't have to.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:59 PM
Dec 2012

And if somebody did invade now most of the American casualties would be from friendly fire.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
13. At what rate?
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 08:12 PM
Dec 2012

Privately Owned Firearms

The estimated total number of guns held by civilians in the United States is 270,000,000
http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/united-states

270 Million! That's a lot of guns. I think that horse is already out of the barn.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/10shrtbl08.xls

8,775 murders by firearms in 2010 compared with 270 million guns in the United States.

That means that of the total civilian guns in circulation only 0.00325% are ever used to murder another person. That's a little over 3/1000's of 1%. Thats a whole lot of guns doing a whole lot of nothing. If guns are ONLY designed to kill, It sounds like most guns are defective.

Let's touch that up a little there are about 80 million gun owners in the US. That means only 0.01096875% of gun owners murder another human being in the US. A little over a 1/100 of 1%. That is exceedingly small, especially when you consider that the majority of murders are ultra-concentrated in gang riddled urban centers like Chicago, NYC and DC.

What say you?

Response to rDigital (Reply #13)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One Thing Is Sure - No En...