Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:15 AM Dec 2012

"Social Security is not currently a driver of the deficit. That's an economic fact."

White House said Social Security should be off the table in 'cliff' talks

It wasn't that long ago that the White House was making the case against including Social Security cuts in "fiscal cliff" talks. Why? Because, as Jay Carney explained in the Nov. 26 briefing, "Social Security is not currently a driver of the deficit. That's an economic fact."



Transcript:

- more -

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/12/18/1171584/-White-House-said-Social-Security-should-be-off-the-table-in-cliff-talks

No friggin deal!





14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
1. True that. The drivers of the deficit are the Bush recession and the invasions and occupations
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:25 AM
Dec 2012

of Iraq and Afghanistan. Third is the bloated military budget.

jsr

(7,712 posts)
4. Because it's the plan:
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:28 AM
Dec 2012
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/15/AR2009011504114.html

Obama Pledges Entitlement Reform
President-Elect Says He'll Reshape Social Security, Medicare Programs

By Michael D. Shear
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, January 16, 2009

President-elect Barack Obama pledged yesterday to shape a new Social Security and Medicare "bargain" with the American people, saying that the nation's long-term economic recovery cannot be attained unless the government finally gets control over its most costly entitlement programs.

That discussion will begin next month, Obama said, when he convenes a "fiscal responsibility summit" before delivering his first budget to Congress. He said his administration will begin confronting the issues of entitlement reform and long-term budget deficits soon after it jump-starts job growth and the stock market.

"What we have done is kicked this can down the road. We are now at the end of the road and are not in a position to kick it any further," he said. "We have to signal seriousness in this by making sure some of the hard decisions are made under my watch, not someone else's."

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
6. Because it's still spending, so it makes the deficit go down to cut it
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:34 AM
Dec 2012

I mean, it's "not a driver of deficit" in the sense that it's self-funded, but if you spent less on Social Security benefits you would decrease the deficit.

I'd love to revisit how the CPI is calculated, but this idea is pretty stupid.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
8. Here:
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:48 AM
Dec 2012
It is also worth noting that under the law, Social Security cannot contribute to the deficit. It was set up by Congress as a stand alone program that can only spend money from its designated revenue stream. All official budget documents show the "on-budget" deficit which excludes revenue and spending from Social Security.

http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/boehner-wants-cuts-to-social-security-and-medicare-not-qchangesq

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
9. Yep. That's what I said
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:53 AM
Dec 2012

It's self funded, but cutting it reduces the amount the govt borrows.

Blame Clinton for claiming a surplus

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
13. You keep saying that and people keep trying to tell you that you do not make
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:41 AM
Dec 2012

the people you borrowed from pay for the bad debts YOU ran up with the money they lent you. It makes no sense.

THEY borrowed from US. They borrowed for things they could not afford. We the people are one of their creditors. We did not go and gamble away our money, THEY did.

Now they have to sacrifice, they have to stop spending money on what caused them to get into debt in the first place. No more tax cuts for the wealthy and no more wars we do not need.

Should they try to make China pay down the US Debt. China, like the American people, are also their creditors. What should they force China to cut? That of course would be a ridiculous suggestion, just as it is a ridiculous suggestion to ask any of their Creditors to help them pay down debts they ran up.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
14. You keep saying that like I'm talking about the morality of it
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:57 AM
Dec 2012

Obviously I know that we shouldn't do that

librechik

(30,674 posts)
3. If we RAISED benefits and raised the cap, SS could substantially contribute to the economy.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:28 AM
Dec 2012

It's another issue where we are being convinced to vote against our own interests.

 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
5. Smart post. But, THEY don't want this because it would undermine the deception
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:31 AM
Dec 2012

pulled on the American people.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
10. yes indeed--we need to rise up and speak--they really pay attention when we do!
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 11:57 AM
Dec 2012

They just assume we'll all buy their crap like they do in Indiana. Guess what, they are a gerrymandered minority.They are scared of the 98%.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
7. It messes up the longer term projections for trust fund solvency though.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:45 AM
Dec 2012

Even though the trust fund is an accounting gimmick, the perceived solvency gives a longevity to the SS fund and to SS itself. If it were seen as insolvent that is when you can truly start changing things.

MiniMe

(21,718 posts)
11. The problem is that Social Security is the biggest holder of t-bills
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 12:27 PM
Dec 2012

The government started borrowing against Social Security in the 80's, or somewhere around that time period, and they will have to start paying what they borrowed back. So they will have to borrow from somewhere else to start paying it back. So the only way it ties into the debt is because Social Security wants to get their investment back.

 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
12. If your going to fail to stiff one of your creditors (the USA has many),
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 03:56 PM
Dec 2012

I would suggest we stiff the banksters, the MIC, China and Saudi Arabia, before we take food off the table of an 85 year old American who has paid for their retirement.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Social Security is ...