General Discussion

applegrove

(118,816 posts) Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:47 PM Dec 2012

The company selling the bullet proof backpacks for kids says they wouldn't

have stopped the high velocity bullets shot at Sandy Hook. (CNN)

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The company selling the bullet proof backpacks for kids says they wouldn't (Original Post) applegrove Dec 2012 OP

K&R (nt) Control-Z Dec 2012 #1

that's what the kevlar plated books are for frylock Dec 2012 #2

DU, what we snark today is what wingnuts say tomorrow Fumesucker Dec 2012 #3

I did not think of how gunnutterdom would take my post. Yes, they'll applegrove Dec 2012 #4

but you never want to miss a good opportunity to sell something in this great country spanone Dec 2012 #5

They probably are correct former-republican Dec 2012 #6

Control-Z

(15,682 posts)

1. K&R (nt)

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 08:22 PM

Dec 2012

frylock

(34,825 posts)

2. that's what the kevlar plated books are for

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:23 PM

Dec 2012

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)

3. DU, what we snark today is what wingnuts say tomorrow

Reply to frylock (Reply #2)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:25 PM

Dec 2012

applegrove

(118,816 posts)

4. I did not think of how gunnutterdom would take my post. Yes, they'll

Reply to frylock (Reply #2)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:28 PM

Dec 2012

call for high velocity guns in every lunchbox to protect the kids.

spanone

(135,888 posts)

5. but you never want to miss a good opportunity to sell something in this great country

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:30 PM

Dec 2012

how could a good capitalist miss the opportunity to cash in on such a huge worldwide story.

former-republican

(2,163 posts)

6. They probably are correct

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:33 PM

Dec 2012

I haven't checked what level they are but to stop
high velocity center fire FMJ with a steel core is not your typical
vest . You need a plate.

Reply to this discussion