Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsScott Brown’s phony concern for public servants
Scott Browns phony concern for public servants
By Steve Benen
If it seems as if Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) frequently struggles with the basics, its because he does.
This is just a mess. Ill concede that there are probably some law-enforcement personnel who, with extensive overtime, can earn six-figure salaries, but (a) its a very small number; (b) thanks to marginal tax rates, a tax increase on income above $250,000 would hardly affect these folks at all; and (c) if theyre bringing in over a quarter-million a year, shielding these folks from modest tax increases to strengthen the country overall shouldnt be politicians top priority.
Besides, as Benjy Sarlin noted, It doesnt sound like theres an epidemic of high-income public servants based on the available data for the area. According to Salary.com, which tracks average pay across various professions, 90% of Boston police patrol officers made a base salary below $75,307 last year and 90% of Lowell patrol officers made a base salary below $70,857. 90% of firefighters in Boston make under $68,793, and below $64,729 in Lowell. The average teacher in Lowell makes about $80,841 a year, according to the Massachusetts Department of Education, higher than the statewide average of $68,781.
But even if we put all of that aside, what really rankles here is the notion that Scott Brown is eager to look out for teachers and first responders.
- more -
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2012_01/scott_browns_phony_concern_for034921.php
By Steve Benen
If it seems as if Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) frequently struggles with the basics, its because he does.
Brown also took on President Barack Obama for proposing tax hikes on families who earn more than $250,000 per year, saying that would hurt teachers, firefighters, policemen, folks who work two jobs.
Asked which public servants earn that much money, Brown said it is common for police officers to earn well over $100,000 annually when overtime is factored into their pay.
You throw in a teacher whos working, plus a summer job, it adds up pretty quickly, he said. Theres quite a few of them.
Asked which public servants earn that much money, Brown said it is common for police officers to earn well over $100,000 annually when overtime is factored into their pay.
You throw in a teacher whos working, plus a summer job, it adds up pretty quickly, he said. Theres quite a few of them.
This is just a mess. Ill concede that there are probably some law-enforcement personnel who, with extensive overtime, can earn six-figure salaries, but (a) its a very small number; (b) thanks to marginal tax rates, a tax increase on income above $250,000 would hardly affect these folks at all; and (c) if theyre bringing in over a quarter-million a year, shielding these folks from modest tax increases to strengthen the country overall shouldnt be politicians top priority.
Besides, as Benjy Sarlin noted, It doesnt sound like theres an epidemic of high-income public servants based on the available data for the area. According to Salary.com, which tracks average pay across various professions, 90% of Boston police patrol officers made a base salary below $75,307 last year and 90% of Lowell patrol officers made a base salary below $70,857. 90% of firefighters in Boston make under $68,793, and below $64,729 in Lowell. The average teacher in Lowell makes about $80,841 a year, according to the Massachusetts Department of Education, higher than the statewide average of $68,781.
But even if we put all of that aside, what really rankles here is the notion that Scott Brown is eager to look out for teachers and first responders.
- more -
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2012_01/scott_browns_phony_concern_for034921.php
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 730 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scott Brown’s phony concern for public servants (Original Post)
ProSense
Jan 2012
OP
ProSense
(116,464 posts)1. Kick! n/t
karynnj
(59,503 posts)2. If there is a cop/teacher couple, who both $100,000 with the
teacher earning an addition $50,000 in the three months of summer - which is pretty impressive as that would be a $200,000 job if it could be done full time, they would still JUST get to $250,000. If that is all their income, they are still impacted. If you assume they are both at $105,000, that would mean the marginal income on that last $10,000 is impacted.
So, this poor couple, earning $260,000 a year, would have to pay an addition about $300. if that rate were raised 3%. I think they could handle that pretty well.
I assume there are a few teachers here who want Brown's list of where teachers can aspire to make that much.