Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Swear to the gods our Bircher of a local newspaper columnist actually wrote the following: (Original Post) TheMightyFavog Dec 2012 OP
He has nearly the equally stupid comment exboyfil Dec 2012 #1
This isn't her first trip to the buffet of stupid. TheMightyFavog Dec 2012 #2
Well, so much for the Christian Omniscient and all powerful God. RC Dec 2012 #3
Trying to make sense of it never works.... Moonwalk Dec 2012 #7
"Ever hear of a crazed gunman terrorizing a police station or an Army base?" ohheckyeah Dec 2012 #4
Slam Dunk Dirty Socialist Dec 2012 #5
Shirley Prudhomme writes a regular column ohheckyeah Dec 2012 #8
See my previous posts: TheMightyFavog Dec 2012 #11
That one was amazing! nt Robyn66 Dec 2012 #14
posted here a few days ago SCantiGOP Dec 2012 #15
I don't have a problem with the banning of automatic weapons ohheckyeah Dec 2012 #17
sure a lot of God talking for a public newspaper lunasun Dec 2012 #6
What the hell is a 'public' newspaper? Jenoch Dec 2012 #10
not a private publication for members only lunasun Dec 2012 #13
My point was where did Jenoch Dec 2012 #16
I'd suggest a raving nasty letter to the editor. nt cecilfirefox Dec 2012 #9
The stupid... progressoid Dec 2012 #12
Dear Editor, Chorophyll Dec 2012 #18

exboyfil

(17,863 posts)
1. He has nearly the equally stupid comment
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 12:41 AM
Dec 2012

about the reason being God not in the school (as opposed to the fact that establishment is not in the school) being the reason for the shootings.

TheMightyFavog

(13,770 posts)
2. This isn't her first trip to the buffet of stupid.
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 01:00 AM
Dec 2012

I will never forget the time she once speculated that the reason mercury in fish is dangerous to humans was due to the fact that mercury contained a lot of lead. O was in college at the time, and had some friends who were majoring in fisheries. I believe one person was quoted as saying that she lost five IQ points just from having read the clipping I handed her.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
3. Well, so much for the Christian Omniscient and all powerful God.
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 01:17 AM
Dec 2012

If mere mortals can keep Him out of schools by passing a law. Tell me again why some worship Him?

God sadly replied that He was not allowed inside. He has been banned from schools.

Moonwalk

(2,322 posts)
7. Trying to make sense of it never works....
Reply to RC (Reply #3)
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 01:36 AM
Dec 2012

...if god allows us free will, then god isn't going to punish anyone for keeping prayer out of school or anywhere else. That's their free choice and they'll presumably suffer for that choice by not being in god's grace.

On the other hand, if god does act when we do such things, punishing us for doing them, then isn't killing a bunch of kids a foolish way to get the message across? (wouldn't it be better for a gunman to walk into a church, shoot it up, and no one gets hit? thus proving if god is there one is defended?). god isn't there so kids die? By that logic, no church should have ever gone up in flames, been destroyed by storm or earthquake, and certainly no gunman should have ever been able to walk into one, let alone kill those in it.....

And most certainly no child who ever went to church and wore his/her cross to school ought to have been shot by anyone. They're carrying god with them, aren't they?

And I've never understood why anyone worships any god whose followers use such horrific and obscene scare tactics to get people to believe in him.

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
8. Shirley Prudhomme writes a regular column
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 01:40 AM
Dec 2012

and she obviously doesn't keep up with current events. It was, what, 3 years ago?

One would think a columnist would actually have to have some original thoughts and knowledge of what's happening in the country.

SCantiGOP

(13,871 posts)
15. posted here a few days ago
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 04:51 PM
Dec 2012

Notice to the NRA:
- Columbine had an armed guard on duty at the school
- Virginia Tech has their own police department
- The Fort Hood "massacre" took place on an army base.

I used that twice to successfully back down people who wanted to argue the banning of automatic weapons and that all we needed at Sandy Hook was one armed person.

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
17. I don't have a problem with the banning of automatic weapons
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 07:52 PM
Dec 2012

myself; I do have a problem with a newspaper columnist saying stupid shit.

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
6. sure a lot of God talking for a public newspaper
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 01:32 AM
Dec 2012

so to country cousin- glad I am in the big city and do not visit here

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
16. My point was where did
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 05:13 PM
Dec 2012

you get the idea that a general circulation newspaper does not or should not have any religious content? I know of dailies with religion columns and entire sections, not to mention news coverage that includes references to religion.

Chorophyll

(5,179 posts)
18. Dear Editor,
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 07:53 PM
Dec 2012

Why yes. Yes I have heard of those things.

What an effing maroon!

ETA: An editor writes sentences like this? "Deaths of the 20 children is especially hard." Yes, deaths is hard. Deaths is always hard.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Swear to the gods our Bir...