General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge rules for Domino's in contraception coverage case
The founder of Domino's Pizza won't be subject to a new federal health care law requiring contraception coverage for employees while a lawsuit he filed challenging the new mandate is pending, a judge has ruled.
<snip>
Monaghan offers health insurance that excludes contraception and abortion for employees...
Read more: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130101/METRO/301010354#ixzz2GhiKYeoC
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Zatkoff's ruling halts enforcement of the mandate against Monaghan and his property management company, of which he is the sole owner and shareholder.
Domino's Farms Corp. manages an office complex owned by Monaghan and is not affiliated with Domino's Pizza. Monaghan sold the pizza company in 1998.
From The Detroit News: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130101/METRO/301010354#ixzz2GkZSR2FK
Occulus
(20,599 posts)which was a practice he started. That makes this his baby, regardless of whether he sold it or not.
malaise
(269,023 posts)Justice Sotomayor just made a decision on a similar case.
PETRUS
(3,678 posts)That's gotta be worth like at least twenty bonus points.
Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)former9thward
(32,016 posts)This is an office complex not the pizza chain.
dembotoz
(16,806 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Kinda odd that the article doesn't mention that he sold the pizza company years ago, and that the company in question is not the pizza company, until a couple of paragraphs down.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,320 posts)and they've worded the first paragraph to keep up that impression. The sign of a journalist/paper more interested in people reading the article than being properly informed by it?
Occulus
(20,599 posts)in the public mind.
Now the pizza chain rightly gets the bad press too. As. It. Should.
Response to PETRUS (Original post)
eppur_se_muova This message was self-deleted by its author.