Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBernie: "Not good legislation…{but} the alternative…much worse.
At 2 a.m. on Jan. 1, the Senate passed a congressional version of a New Years resolution. This was not good legislation, Bernie said. Unfortunately, the alternative of not passing the bill would have been much worse. In addition to making sure most Americans do not see an increase in their income taxes and that 2 million workers will continue to receive unemployment compensation, the bill raises taxes on the wealthy and continues credits for families that need help caring for children and sending their kids to college.
What's Next?
So what comes next? President Obamas initial proposal called for $1.6 trillion in new revenue. The bill that passed only brought in $620 billion 40 percent of what the president originally requested. This not only means that no progress was made on deficit reduction, but that the Republicans (and some Democrats) will be increasingly aggressive about wanting to cut Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, veterans programs and other vitally important programs for working families. Bernie intends to lead the fight against these devastating cuts. As soon as the new Congress reconvenes, he will introduce legislation that will require corporate America to start paying its fair share of taxes.
What's Next?
So what comes next? President Obamas initial proposal called for $1.6 trillion in new revenue. The bill that passed only brought in $620 billion 40 percent of what the president originally requested. This not only means that no progress was made on deficit reduction, but that the Republicans (and some Democrats) will be increasingly aggressive about wanting to cut Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, veterans programs and other vitally important programs for working families. Bernie intends to lead the fight against these devastating cuts. As soon as the new Congress reconvenes, he will introduce legislation that will require corporate America to start paying its fair share of taxes.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 983 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie: "Not good legislation…{but} the alternative…much worse. (Original Post)
Jackpine Radical
Jan 2013
OP
Explain to me why Obama asked for 1.6 Tillion, Boner offered 800 Billion and now its 620 Billion
bahrbearian
Jan 2013
#6
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)1. IOW ...
This was not good legislation, Bernie said. Unfortunately, the alternative of not passing the bill would have been much worse. In addition to making sure most Americans do not see an increase in their income taxes and that 2 million workers will continue to receive unemployment compensation, the bill raises taxes on the wealthy and continues credits for families that need help caring for children and sending their kids to college.
"This legislation was the product of the divided government governing process."
I can live with it ... so can the millions of working class folks that benefitted from it; even if, as always happens, non-working class folks, also benefitted.
Heard during during serving at a homeless shelter's kitchen, in response to a discussion of the fiscal cliff (held by some volunteer):
Mannnn, I'm starving ... I live on the street. What do I care that someone living up the hill gets a meal, too?
Sometimes, those of us living "up the hill" forget that simple reality.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)2. I would like to see Bernie, Al Franken and Elizabeth Warren
get together and form a caucus.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)3. This is
a negative?
This was not good legislation, Bernie said. Unfortunately, the alternative of not passing the bill would have been much worse. In addition to making sure most Americans do not see an increase in their income taxes and that 2 million workers will continue to receive unemployment compensation, the bill raises taxes on the wealthy and continues credits for families that need help caring for children and sending their kids to college.
Most critics of the the deal didn't think the alternative was "much worse." The rest is all positive.
Here is Sander's official statement:
Sanders Statement on Passage of Fiscal Bill
WASHINGTON, Jan. 2 Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) issued the following statement after Congress approved legislation that extends green energy incentives as part of a bill to preserve tax cuts for working families:
This agreement preserves incentives for the development of clean energy by encouraging companies that are creating jobs in America and helping reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming. That is a win-win for our economy and our environment. In Vermont and across the country, hundreds of wind manufacturing plants already are producing wind turbines, and the industry is providing jobs for 75,000 American workers. The fact that we have doubled wind generation since 2008 is an American success story. Extending the Production Tax Credit means we can continue the tremendous growth in wind and other safe, clean, renewable sources energy that must be developed if we are to reverse global warming.
This agreement also is a major victory for Social Security recipients and for disabled veterans. Despite an eleventh-hour bid by Senate Republicans, the final bill does not include their proposed change in how cost-of-living adjustments are calculated. As the founder of the Defending Social Security Caucus and the incoming chairman of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, I am proud that organizations representing seniors and veterans worked together to block the switch to a so-called chained CPI as a way to cut future benefits for more than 55 million Americans.
Social Security has not contributed a nickel to the deficit, has a $2.7 trillion surplus and can pay all benefits owed to every eligible American for the next 21 years. It makes no sense to balance the budget on the backs of seniors and the disabled. I will continue fighting to make sure cuts in Social Security are not part of any future budget deal.
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=5ca2f3ee-8db8-4d38-af91-b6d187c71e35
WASHINGTON, Jan. 2 Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) issued the following statement after Congress approved legislation that extends green energy incentives as part of a bill to preserve tax cuts for working families:
This agreement preserves incentives for the development of clean energy by encouraging companies that are creating jobs in America and helping reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming. That is a win-win for our economy and our environment. In Vermont and across the country, hundreds of wind manufacturing plants already are producing wind turbines, and the industry is providing jobs for 75,000 American workers. The fact that we have doubled wind generation since 2008 is an American success story. Extending the Production Tax Credit means we can continue the tremendous growth in wind and other safe, clean, renewable sources energy that must be developed if we are to reverse global warming.
This agreement also is a major victory for Social Security recipients and for disabled veterans. Despite an eleventh-hour bid by Senate Republicans, the final bill does not include their proposed change in how cost-of-living adjustments are calculated. As the founder of the Defending Social Security Caucus and the incoming chairman of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, I am proud that organizations representing seniors and veterans worked together to block the switch to a so-called chained CPI as a way to cut future benefits for more than 55 million Americans.
Social Security has not contributed a nickel to the deficit, has a $2.7 trillion surplus and can pay all benefits owed to every eligible American for the next 21 years. It makes no sense to balance the budget on the backs of seniors and the disabled. I will continue fighting to make sure cuts in Social Security are not part of any future budget deal.
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=5ca2f3ee-8db8-4d38-af91-b6d187c71e35
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)4. That's how the corporate game is played.
There is *always* an option that would have been worse. But the option we get *always* moves us rightward.
600 billion from just a fraction of the rich who SHOULD be paying, while the remainder of the FOUR TRILLION demanded by this deal will be extracted from the rest of us. And our negotiating position for the coming hostage deal is already weakened by pre-emptively making 85 percent of he Bush tax cuts permanent.
Guess who they will be coming after?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)5. I can't figure out
why this is being ignored:
"Perhaps the best prism through which to see the Democrats gains is inequality."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022123732
Comments welcomed.
bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)6. Explain to me why Obama asked for 1.6 Tillion, Boner offered 800 Billion and now its 620 Billion