General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe secrecy veiling Obama’s drone war
I'm posting this as FYI, sans any editorial comment by 99th_Monkey.
____^____^____^____^____^____^____^____^
The secrecy veiling Obamas drone war
By Daphne Eviatar * JANUARY 4, 2013 * Reuters
Its rare for a judge to express regret over her own ruling. But thats what happened Wednesday, when Judge Colleen McMahon of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York reluctantly ruled that the Obama administration does not need to provide public justification for its deadly drone war.
The memos requested by two New York Times reporters and the American Civil Liberties Union, McMahon wrote, implicate serious issues about the limits on the power of the Executive Branch under the Constitution and laws of the United States, and about whether we are indeed a nation of laws, not of men. Still, the Freedom of Information Act allows the executive branch to keep many things secret.
In this case, McMahon ruled, the administrations justifications for the killing of select individuals including American citizens without so much as a hearing, constitute an internal deliberative process by the government that need not be disclosed.
McMahon did not hide her disappointment. The Alice-in-Wonderland nature of this pronouncement is not lost on me, she wrote, but after careful and extensive consideration, I find myself stuck in a paradoxical situation in which I cannot solve a problem because of contradictory constraints and rules a veritable Catch-22. She explained, I can find no way around the thicket of laws and precedents that effectively allow the Executive Branch of our government to proclaim as perfectly lawful certain actions that seem on their face incompatible with our Constitution and laws, while keeping the reasons for their conclusion a secret.
To rest of article: http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/01/04/the-secrecy-veiling-obamas-drone-war/
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)lawful certain actions that seem on their face incompatible with our Constitution and laws"
is that those actions are "incompatible with our Constitution and laws". They are
Unconstitutional and illegal.