General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe speech STARTED with two big lies
#1. The Iraq War made the USA more secure as a nation.
#2 The Iraq War made the USA more respected around the world.
Discuss.
FarLeftFist
(6,161 posts)TheWraith
(24,331 posts)What he said was that:
1. The Iraq War is over.
2. The US is now more secure and more respected around the world than it used to be.
He in no way implied that number two was BECAUSE of the Iraq War. You could more easily read it that he was saying it was because the war was OVER and US troops are out of Iraq. b
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)He's dead to me.
FrenchieCat
(68,867 posts)we are more secure and respected......
That's the part Pres. Obama had something to do with,
and recognizing the Armed Forces at the end of a war
is something smart to do.
Should he had said the Armed Forces of the United States
have made us less safe and less respected.....
Because last I look, that was what Bush did.....not so much
most of the soldiers.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)He did not do a service to the country in any way by stating those two untruths. he could have simply not said them -he did not have to say that it made the US less respected and less safe.
Continuing the lies is consistent, however, with the idea that we should not "look back" -in other words, we really should not reconsider our actions with regards to the illegitimate and the immorality of what we did in Iraq.
Let me ask you this: If we do not look back and ask those tough questions while it is happening OR after it is over, when will we do so?
And if we NEVER consider our actions, how will there ever be any progress made?
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)that war is somehow an answer... it isn't. It has just about bankrupted our nation.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)If we are to continue our grand experiment in democracy, we must hone and USE our critical thinking skills. We must discern when we are hearing propaganda, and when we are hearing outright lies. We must refuse to play sycophant to those we entrust with leadership roles.
guitar man
(15,996 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)It wasn't clear to me if he meant that people of the world respect America because we stopped killing Iraqis? Or what, exactly.
I'd like to see some substance to back up those assertions.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)Initech
(100,080 posts)FLyellowdog
(4,276 posts)donheld
(21,311 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)#1. The Iraq War made the USA more secure as a nation.
#2 The Iraq War made the USA more respected around the world.
...that's not what he said.
We gather tonight knowing that this generation of heroes has made the United States safer and more respected around the world. For the first time in nine years, there are no Americans fighting in Iraq. For the first time in two decades, Osama bin Laden is not a threat to this country. Most of al Qaedas top lieutenants have been defeated. The Talibans momentum has been broken, and some troops in Afghanistan have begun to come home.
http://news.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/01/obama-i-intend-to-fight-obstruction-with-action.php
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Prosense is way off on this one. But staying with her/his theme."
...no I'm not.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002218581
Can someone point the quote that states: "The Iraq War made the USA more secure as a nation" or "The Iraq War made the USA more respected around the world."
This is inaccurate paraphrasing. Ironic that it's being used to claim a lie was told.
Logical
(22,457 posts)I'm not a fan of paraphrasing that distorts.
If that's your thing, I'm not the person you should agree with.
Logical
(22,457 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)How did sending them to Iraq make America safer and more respected?
Or are you saying he's talking about some other troops who returned from somewhere else?
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)It would be more heroic if they refrained from aiding the military-industrial shakedown and bombing of brown people for no good reason.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)not "the Iraq war"
The first is more open ended than the second, and it is about the PEOPLE, rather than a specific action.
Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)because often it is rather, shall we say, pedantic. I agree with what you are saying here because you have stated what he said IN CONTEXT. And the context of that statement is very important. He was talking about the ending has made us safer and more respected, not that the war has.
While I have disagreements with the Prez often, I will not twist what he states just to disagree. Thanks, ProSense.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)I read the statement and that is what the president said. We are 'safer' and 'more respected' because of the troops who were in Iraq. The exact opposite is true, actually.
Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)It's exactly the withdrawal that makes us safer and more respected. Sabrina, of all people, I would expect that you would understand that. You surprise me. BTW, I almost always agree with you and like very much what you say and look forward to your entries. Maybe I was unclear in what I said. I don't think we are in disagreement on this.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)come out and say that the war was a waste of lives and money. But the statement was open to interpretation and probably on purpose, so many people heard 'the war in Iraq has made us safer'.
I long for the day when a president can just speak the truth instead of having to gloss over major crimes committed by those in office.
That he, who opposed the war and for all the right reasons, one main reason why I supported him, has to be careful how he talks about it now, is a sad statement on where we are.
Thank you for your kind words, and no problem re sometimes not seeing things in the same way. I think in this case it's not so much a reflection on the president that he has to be careful when he speaks about our overseas adventures, but on our whole system.
You may be right in your interpretation and I would like to think that he was making a statement as subtly as he could. Still, none of the warmongers have chastised him for speaking against the war, so either he fooled them completely, or they heard what some of us heard.
And I look forward to your posts also, Bohunk
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Explain to me the difference. He was talking about the Iraq War. You know it and I know it.
So what knew Spin-ditry is this?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)MinervaX
(169 posts)Isn't that a question that only time will answer. How many new Bin Ladens are being born into poverty in Iraq right now and being taught about the Great Satan America. Quite a few I would imagine.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)Looks and tastes pretty much the same to me, stripped of the niceties of applause lines, formal language, and rousing rhetoric.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Not true.
And the blockade of supplies to the troops in Afghanistan by Pakistan continues.
progressoid
(49,991 posts)Exactly what the OP said.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)But the US has a population infatuated with lies.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)The Man shows signs of Speaking Under the Influence of Kool-Aid. I want to see him take a Breathalyzer before he's allowed back behind the wheel.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)on those two points.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)That is all.
DeathToTheOil
(1,124 posts)Disgust. GWB wrecked the U.S.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)It's a good thing to honor and help the returning troops, its quite another thing to proclaim, in so many words, "Mission Accomplished."
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Everyone in the military is a "hero", regardless of what they do. Anyone who doesn't support the military 100% (especially their unlimited budget) hates the troops and hates America. It's just good business.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Well color me shocked.
I swear I never stop being surprised at how many people seem not to have the first clue about how politics actually works.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)I'm merely pointing out the reality of the American culture, not suggesting that the President is making a mistake politically by jumping on that train. He is most certainly a politician and a very good one. Of course he's going to pander to the "hero" meme, even if it means saying something ridiculous like "our heros in Iraq made us safer and more respected".
redqueen
(115,103 posts)We (the royal we, USicans, not you and I) fairly worship the military. Fail to pay sufficient homage to the military, and you will not be elected. It really is as simple as that.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)"cult of hero worship for the military"
This is also perpetuated by the media day after day. It's sickening.
madamesilverspurs
(15,805 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Discussion over.
Sid
wakemewhenitsover
(1,595 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)but starting with the Failed Nightmare in Iraq,
and ending with the flag wrapping WAR/Killing glorification turned my stomach.
The only thing missing was the band playing Ride of the Valkyries.
I had some hopes that this President would lead us to Peace,
and was Praying for a
"now that we have gotten Bin Laden, it is time to bang the swords into plowshares" moment.
So sad.
You will know them by their WORKS.
[font size=5 color=green][center]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]
tranche
(929 posts)I think to myself, "These people are fucking crazy."
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)the ENDING of the Iraq war made the USA more secure and more respected
librechik
(30,674 posts)moodforaday
(1,860 posts)He said "this generation of heroes has made the United States safer and more respected around the world". "This generation of heroes" (what a sick lie in itself!) refers to the troops. The troops were there to fight the war, they did not end the war. Obama is praising them - the tools of Bush's and his own murderous spree. There is nothing about ending the war in this sentence, so please do not argue that there is.
The notion of ending the Iraq war comes in the sentence that follows, but it really belongs in a separate paragraph, as it is not connected to the one we are discussing.
And then at the end he threatened a war with Iran.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)and when he said those things, there was spontaneous groaning and scoffing.
There was spontaneous applause at the "less teaching to the test" line.
countryjake
(8,554 posts)and it certainly does little to build any admiration for a military that has continually been held unaccountable for any of the atrocities committed during the past decade.
Al Qaeda's presence in Iraq appears to be growing, as bombings, mass killings, and terror against minorities has steadily increased since the USA officially "ended" that occupation. The weakness of any functioning leadership in a nation that our government effectively destroyed, all of the "instability" that is being reported since our pullout and the total havoc that is apparent in most of our daily evening news coming from Iraq, makes what the prez said about no more Americans fighting there seem like a cruel joke...a "wink, wink" to the rest of world. His remarks on safety and respect may seem like a slap in the face to any Iraqis who just might view our troops more as criminals rather than any generation of heroes.
I cry for Haditha and only hope that the SOTU was not available there.
Toucano
(11,583 posts)Which made the whole event look like a picnic at the mental ward.
Washington is completely detached from reality.
T S Justly
(884 posts)sad sally
(2,627 posts)As this "great" nation falls farther behind other nations in education, energy, infrastructure, health, life expectancy, infant mortality, poverty, retirement security, and happiness, we proudly remain number one in all things military.
What a hokus-pokus math claim when he said the military would be cutting half a trillion dollars from the military, but forgot to mention this was over 10 years, which is $50 billion a year from a total budget of over a trillion a year.
rudycantfail
(300 posts)that's designed to appeal to two groups: First, the neocons because it bolsters their false claims that these wars are keeping us safe and second, the great middle of America that wants to feel good and hopeful about something and generally supports the U.S. military. At the same time it discourages criticism from the left by hiding failed and harmful policies behind the troops.
It's a close cousin to 2003's SUPPORT OUR TROOPS.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Prometheus Bound
(3,489 posts)chervilant
(8,267 posts)If, by win, you mean 'who made the most money,' I'd have to say Dick Cheney, Halliburton and Blackwater.