General Discussion

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts) Fri Jan 11, 2013, 03:43 PM Jan 2013

Delaware couple arrested for sex with dog (Poor Fido)

A Delaware couple was arrested on Tuesday for allegedly engaging in sexual acts with a canine, according to court records obtained by The Delaware State News.

Samantha L. Golt, 24, was allegedly photographed by James P. Crow, 25, having sex with the animal. Those photographs were turned over to police on December 28 by a concerned citizen, but it was not clear how that person came to possess the images.

Although photos did not show Crow engaging in sexual activity with the dog, Delaware’s bestiality law includes people who induce others to engage in unlawful acts with animals.

Golt and Crow were each charged with one count of bestiality and second-degree conspiracy, both felony crimes. They face up to seven years in prison and lifetime registry in a sex offender database.

Raw Story (http://s.tt/1yj0s)

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Delaware couple arrested for sex with dog (Poor Fido) (Original Post) Playinghardball Jan 2013 OP

If nothing else, living in this country is interesting. n/t A HERETIC I AM Jan 2013 #1

That's unusual. n/t Cali_Democrat Jan 2013 #2

Obviously, this more than just case of puppy love gone wrong. nt MrScorpio Jan 2013 #3

and they called it puppy love datasuspect Jan 2013 #4

and you know what people say dsc Jan 2013 #5

LOL Playinghardball Jan 2013 #6

Shouldn't this be in the Weird News forum? nt Mnemosyne Jan 2013 #7

Otherwise known as "General Discussion" A HERETIC I AM Jan 2013 #8

This is heartbreaking Mojorabbit Jan 2013 #9

Me too! LeftofObama Jan 2013 #10

Those people *really* screwed the pooch. Nye Bevan Jan 2013 #11

Woa there, does this mean Santorum was right? rustydog Jan 2013 #12

No because they're a one man, one woman style marriage lunatica Jan 2013 #17

Post removed Post removed Jan 2013 #13

This is not what's meant by "screwing the pooch" meow2u3 Jan 2013 #14

You can't 'have sex with' a dog. It's sexual assault leftstreet Jan 2013 #15

Santorum where art thou? lunatica Jan 2013 #16

A HERETIC I AM

(24,370 posts)

1. If nothing else, living in this country is interesting. n/t

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 03:52 PM

Jan 2013

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)

2. That's unusual. n/t

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 03:54 PM

Jan 2013

MrScorpio

(73,631 posts)

3. Obviously, this more than just case of puppy love gone wrong. nt

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 03:54 PM

Jan 2013

datasuspect

(26,591 posts)

4. and they called it puppy love

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 03:55 PM

Jan 2013

dsc

(52,163 posts)

5. and you know what people say

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 03:58 PM

Jan 2013

if you let a man marry a woman then soon they will both want to marry their dog.

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts)

6. LOL

Reply to dsc (Reply #5)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 04:04 PM

Jan 2013

Mnemosyne

(21,363 posts)

7. Shouldn't this be in the Weird News forum? nt

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 04:06 PM

Jan 2013

A HERETIC I AM

(24,370 posts)

8. Otherwise known as "General Discussion"

Reply to Mnemosyne (Reply #7)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 04:08 PM

Jan 2013

Mojorabbit

(16,020 posts)

9. This is heartbreaking

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 04:21 PM

Jan 2013

Dogs are such trusting animals and to abuse one this way is beyond the pale. I hate people sometimes.

LeftofObama

(4,243 posts)

10. Me too!

Reply to Mojorabbit (Reply #9)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 04:42 PM

Jan 2013

This is not only heartbreaking, it's downright disgusting. I hope they serve jail time for that.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)

11. Those people *really* screwed the pooch.

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 04:47 PM

Jan 2013

Sorry, couldn't resist....

rustydog

(9,186 posts)

12. Woa there, does this mean Santorum was right?

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 04:54 PM

Jan 2013

lunatica

(53,410 posts)

17. No because they're a one man, one woman style marriage

Reply to rustydog (Reply #12)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:37 PM

Jan 2013

Santorum said teh gay marriage would lead to teh man on dog thing. He never mentioned that teh not gay marriage would too.

Response to Playinghardball (Original post)

Post removed

meow2u3

(24,764 posts)

14. This is not what's meant by "screwing the pooch"

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:32 PM

Jan 2013

Sorry, couldn't resist.

All kidding aside, they should be charged with sexual assault of an animal because the dog can't consent. In addition, they should be barred from ever "owning" (read: being owned by) an animal.

leftstreet

(36,109 posts)

15. You can't 'have sex with' a dog. It's sexual assault

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:34 PM

Jan 2013

A dog can't consent

It's creepy to see it otherwise

lunatica

(53,410 posts)

16. Santorum where art thou?

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:35 PM

Jan 2013

This was a traditional one man, one woman marriage Mr. Santorum. What do you say to that?

Reply to this discussion