General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBREAKING: Wall Street investigation launched
MoveOn members in action:
Dear MoveOn member,
Did you watch the State of the Union tonight? President Obama did exactly what hundreds of thousands of us have been calling on him to dohe announced a federal investigation into Wall Street. Here's what he said:
"I am asking my Attorney General to create a special unit of federal prosecutors and leading state attorneys general to expand our investigations into the abusive lending and packaging of risky mortgages that led to the housing crisis. This new unit will hold accountable those who broke the law, speed assistance to homeowners, and help turn the page on an era of recklessness that hurt so many Americans."
The best part is, progressive champion New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is co-chairing the investigation and will make sure it stays on track.
Just weeks ago, this investigation wasn't even on the table, and the big banks were pushing for a broad settlement that would have made it impossible. Your work changed all that.
This is truly a huge victory for the 99% movement. Hundreds of thousands of us signed petitions, made calls, and held signs outside in the cold to make this issue something that President Obama couldn't ignore. Here's some of what MoveOn members and our allies did to bring about this victory:
Over 360,000 of us signed a petition calling on President Obama to fully investigate the banks.
We delivered that petition at over 150 events last Thursday around the country at Obama for America campaign offices.
Our pressure on state attorneys general stopped the rush to a sweetheart deal that would have precluded this investigation.
And we've called, Facebooked, and tweeted at the White House repeatedly to ask the president to launch this investigation.
Great news
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Wall Street. Now he has been joined by 12 others. The people have spoken loudly about how they feel about this. But his refusal to cave under pressure shows that just one person CAN make a difference especially on an issue that the people care so much about.
And I am glad the President is listening. Who said 'whining' doesn't work?
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)and to think Republican Steve Cooley could've won the position in last midterms since he was district attorney for L.A. and had deep pockets. It was close, but she ultimately won - yeeeaaaaah!
From January 2008 to the present, the SFDA High-tech Crime and ID Theft Unit has charged almost 75 new cases. The SFDA Elder Abuse and Real Estate Fraud Unit has filed twice as many felony cases from 2007 to 2008. Additionally, DA Harris has expanded the SFDA Consumer Protection Unit which handled over 450 consumer complaints in 2009.
Kamala Harris also formed the first stand-alone Mortgage and Investment Fraud Unit in the San Francisco District Attorneys Office to investigate and prosecute financial predators. The United States Department of Justice awarded the SFDA a $1.06 million grant to establish the unit and intensify local efforts to protect consumers from mortgage and investment fraud.
http://www.kamalaharris.org/issues/594
I believe the president has been listening all along, and it was his intention to go after Wall Street considering how the DOJ awarded Kamala Harris a $1.06 million grant to establish the fraud unit back in 2008. Kamala Harris, CA AG
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)good for her. We need more people like her, and I am very glad she won. Had the Repub won, this would not be happening.
Thanks for the links.
Edited to say, the reason people did not think the president was going to encourage investigations was because he more or less said so and when he stated that there was probably no crime involved, that angered a lot of people.
It's possible that since then he read the Bipartisan Senate Committee's Report, which took two years and is pretty detailed. It was recommended to the DOJ several months ago because 'there is evidence of criminal activity' in what lead to the Financial Meltdown.
Regardless, I am very glad to hear what he said tonight. That is what people were hoping for.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)of going after fraud in the financial industry so even though I was contacted by various groups to call and e-mail her and sign a petition, I'm pretty sure she had no intention of "settling".
I heard the president mention something like that, too, but I know he's got a LOT of enemies in Congress. He, most likely and very vaguely, mentioned he might not go after the industry because he probably needed to find out who in Congress is on the take. You don't show your hand until the very last moment and you don't begin serous investigations unless you're certain laws have been broken and cases are prosecutable.
So, I was happy he made it clear he would focus on going after the banksters because that means he has enough evidence.
If this sounds kind of weird, it's because it's 2:30 in the morning here in CA and I'm waiting for my daughter to come home from work. I'm yawning like a sonofagun and am longing for my comfortable, warm bed, but I hate to think my daughter comes home to a dark house.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)to get some sleep
Since he made the statement about there being more immorality than crime involved, he may have met with some of the Senators, both Republicans and Democrats, who were on the Committee for two years investigating the causes and who agreed that there is 'evidence of criminal activity'.
True which is why it was important that he mentioned this in the SOTU. I imagine he does have more information now. Maybe from some of those US Attorneys who have been looking into the crimes.
There are also the revelations about insider trading in Congress. I would have thought that was automatically a crime, it is for everyone else. I was surprised he mentioned it in the SOTU. But today I see there is a bi-partisan effort to make it illegal.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)We all agree on this even the President.
I'm a proud member of MoveON.
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)like taking a few sentences out of a politician's speech and pretending that something has changed, and using it as an occasion to raise money.
suffragette
(12,232 posts)K&R
BeHereNow
(17,162 posts)Pack your bags, you Wall Street scum.
It's off to prison with you.
BHN
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Fuck them for jumping on the OWS movement and trying to make it their own.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)leeroysphitz
(10,462 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)leeroysphitz
(10,462 posts)Skittles
(153,169 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)DU just gets better and better every day.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)I've had some issues with MoveON and PDA.
and the OWS but generally they are on your side.
The baby is to prosecute wall street.
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)MoveOn is the anti-OWS.
Chuuku Davis
(565 posts)tavalon
(27,985 posts)I've said for a while that Obama used to have three choices, Lead, Follow or Get The Hell Out of the Way. I've also said that he lost the first choice in his first term. But I'm thrilled that he chose Follow instead of the third option. OWS spoke and the President has chosen to follow (though I think he would love it if it looked like he was leading but that's not an option available to him anymore). I hope he not only follows but follows through.
Devil_Fish
(1,664 posts)Turn the page.
Round the corner.
Looking forward, not back....
I thing we need a surge on the banks.
I allready moved to a credit union, how about you?
D_F
malaise
(269,054 posts)Great news
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)i?
Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)Thanks for the thread, Ichingcarpenter.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)Yep.
PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)Progressives United (Russ Feingold's organization)
Progressive Change Campaign Committee
Working America
I had received emails from them as well asking members to make phone calls, write letters, sign petitions.