General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsParents on their smartphones while their kids run around the park
Does this piss anyone else off as much as it pisses me off? Now that I'm a father of a VERY active almost-3 yr old little girl, I take her to the park and library all the time. She loves to run and play, and I love chasing after her, talking to her, reading to her, etc. Maybe I'm a bit overprotective, but I never take my eyes off her for more than a few seconds when we're not in a very familiar place (at home, a friend's place, the enclosed play area at the library, etc).
But what I've now noticed is that I am apparently the exception to the rule. The majority of parents seem to set their children to run free, while they play on their phones. I understand that everyone needs a few minutes to relax now and then, ESPECIALLY when you have to devote so much time to your kids, but I'm not talking about quickly checking a text or an email. I've seen a mom who fixated on her screen for 10-15 min straight, only to freak the fuck out when she lifted her head and her kids are nowhere to be found (we found them in the woods next to the park, playing Fort behind some logs).
Am I alone in my frustration, or are there other parents out there that have seen the same thing as I have? Before the advent of smartphones, was there any similar analogy? Did parents back in the 80's and 90's do the same using books instead of phones?
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)I remember that instant sick feeling in the pit of my stomach when I lost track of them even for a couple seconds.
I am not a super overprotective parent, but too many things can happen to toddlers and young children in a park, swimming pool, amusement park, etc. etc. if they're not supervised -- not just stranger abduction (which is exceedingly rare), but injuries and so on.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)But if it's an older child, I think it's fine to sit back and read, or chat with a friend, or whatever.
I don't agree that all kids of all ages need their parents to watch their kids constantly when they play, but I'm not sure if you are specifically talking about young kids and toddlers, as with your daughter, or children of all ages.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)there is nothing new about stupidity or carelessness.
Iggo
(47,565 posts)Glitterati
(3,182 posts)Smartphones are just the current excuse not to parent.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)And other pursuis.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)and sit under an umbrella working on sculptures, drawing or reading. We could have drowned and she would not have noticed.
I take my kids to the park and use my smartphone to take photos of them. For the most part I keep my phone in my bag and spend my time chasing them or playing with them. So no, I don't think it's anything new. And yes, it's pretty dangerous if the parent is completely unattentive.
Dyedinthewoolliberal
(15,588 posts)I guess times have really changed. My parents use to let me wander around all day! With no supervision. I don't thnk the world is more dangerous now than it was then, (mid 50's on) or is it?
cali
(114,904 posts)that's idiotic and I don't care when you grew up.
Dyedinthewoolliberal
(15,588 posts)but thanks for the kind words...........
juajen
(8,515 posts)I remember not even hearing of abductions or murders. Of course, we did not have a TV on constantly. We got our first black and white around 1946, or somewhere in that range. I was 5 to 8 years old. We only watched Mickey Mouse Club and Howdy Doody, parents watched Ed Sullivan, and Dinah Shore. The 50's were a very different mindset than today. Honestly, we were innocent. Mom did let me play outside, sometimes even when it was dark, but I had five older siblings and they carefully guarded us, or at least, it seemed that they did. We were never afraid, and neither was my Mom.
maggiesfarmer
(297 posts)but you're 100% right -- there was a lot less media.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)Robb
(39,665 posts)I figure they're answering work emails or something, squeezing in some extra time with the kiddos they might've otherwise spent at the office.
I know they're probably watching foxes jumping on trampolines on YouTube or something, but I like my version of events better.
FSogol
(45,525 posts)Maybe if you live in a place where kids cannot run free without total parental supervision, maybe you should think of moving.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)You let your boys roam free as toddlers?
Renew Deal
(81,871 posts)Seriously though, I'm not sure there is a place that you can move that you don't have to worry about kids.
Nay
(12,051 posts)he also runs around with any little friends he finds. Grandma's eye is always on the prize. If the play area is busy, it would be insanely easy for someone to make off with a small child. It ain't gonna happen to this grandma. I'd never forgive myself. Frankly, I don't even leave him alone with Grandpa at the park, because Grandpa thinks it is too paranoid to worry about such things. OK, whatever. Let me repeat: it ain't happenin' under grandma's watch.
Edit to add: he's 5. When I was a kid, we ran around all day by ourselves, but we were 8 or 9 before we were allowed to do that.
juajen
(8,515 posts)Jennicut
(25,415 posts)And they are 7 and 8 now. Some parents are idiots. One time when we were camping we met a family with girls near the age of mine. They practically left us with their daughters at our campsite for hours. We were strangers! They did not pay any attention to them at all. I have seen parents like this a few times. I think you have to get a balance between being a helicopter parent and paying attention. But your daughter is only 3. You are doing it right.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)Parents who insisted on watching their kids every second were regarded as overbearing and paranoid. As young as six, I'd head out of my house on weekends shortly after morning cartoons ended, and frequently wouldn't be home until dinner time. And that was NORMAL. It was a different era.
I pretty much let my own kids run free too. I'd take them to the park, and I'd play with them if that's what they wanted, but more often than not they'd just take off with a bunch of other kids. I'd kick back under a tree with my laptop or a book to keep myself occupied while they had fun.
maggiesfarmer
(297 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Or I'd ride my bike to it...
When mom was with me, she sat on a bench and read, knitted, or gossiped with a friend....
But like you said, different time/era (mid-late 80s in my case)
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)At, say, 2, yeah- you better be keeping a close eye on them.
When they get to be, say, 8, you can let them be a bit more self-directed.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)FWIW - moms have been doing this for quite some time - only before the smart phone, it was the neighborhood moms gathering and chatting while the kids played.
There's a mall playground in a closeby (15 min) major city and if I have some shopping to do and we stop by the playground, I don't take my eyes off my 5 and 9 yo for one second.
Our neighborhood playgrounds though...hell ya. Usually there are very few people there. I play on my phone and look up every now and again. If a friend joins me, we chat while the kids play. If your daughter is your first child...then that is why you are like that. I was like that with my first too (she's now 15). I have 4 total. It really is true that you relax with each kid.
Keep in mind, however, that I'm in Canada in a small town. Our crime rate consists of slashed tires and graffiti. If there's a B&E, it's news. So YMMV.
sad-cafe
(1,277 posts)when people are absorbed with their phones.
Iris
(15,666 posts)I wouldn't do it, even though I'd be tempted.