Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWest Point study on ‘violent far right’ shows ‘dramatic rise’ in attacks
A report published by the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point Military Academy on Jan. 15 discusses the potential dangers of violent far-right organizations, which has angered some conservatives that believe the military should focus on international threats.
The executive summary of the paper, Challengers from the Sidelines: Understanding Americas Violent Far-Right, claims that since 2007, there has been a dramatic rise in the number of attacks and violent plots originating from individuals and groups who self- identify with the far-right of American politics.
Written by Arie Perliger, Director of Terrorism Studies at the Combating Terrorism Center and an Assistant Professor at the Department of Social Sciences at West Point, the paper asserts that three distinct ideologies exist in the American violent far right. Those are a racist/white supremacy movement, an anti-federalist movement and a fundamentalist movement, the last of which includes mainly Christian Identity groins such as the Aryan Nations.
Findings indicate that it is not only feelings of deprivation that motivate those involved in far right violence, but also the sense of empowerment that emerges when the political system is perceived to be increasingly permissive to far right ideas, it later reads.
The rise in attacks in the 21st century were significant, as Although in the 1990s the average number of attacks per year was 70.1, the average number of attacks per year in the first 11 years of the twenty-first century was 307.5, a rise of more than 400%.
The executive summary of the paper, Challengers from the Sidelines: Understanding Americas Violent Far-Right, claims that since 2007, there has been a dramatic rise in the number of attacks and violent plots originating from individuals and groups who self- identify with the far-right of American politics.
Written by Arie Perliger, Director of Terrorism Studies at the Combating Terrorism Center and an Assistant Professor at the Department of Social Sciences at West Point, the paper asserts that three distinct ideologies exist in the American violent far right. Those are a racist/white supremacy movement, an anti-federalist movement and a fundamentalist movement, the last of which includes mainly Christian Identity groins such as the Aryan Nations.
Findings indicate that it is not only feelings of deprivation that motivate those involved in far right violence, but also the sense of empowerment that emerges when the political system is perceived to be increasingly permissive to far right ideas, it later reads.
The rise in attacks in the 21st century were significant, as Although in the 1990s the average number of attacks per year was 70.1, the average number of attacks per year in the first 11 years of the twenty-first century was 307.5, a rise of more than 400%.
Raw Story (http://s.tt/1yGlR)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1255 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (18)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
West Point study on ‘violent far right’ shows ‘dramatic rise’ in attacks (Original Post)
octoberlib
Jan 2013
OP
"the sense of empowerment that emerges when the political system is perceived to be increasingly...
bettyellen
Jan 2013
#1
Yes and the far right money has spent a fortune buying media outlets & spin doctors to convince
okaawhatever
Jan 2013
#3
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)1. "the sense of empowerment that emerges when the political system is perceived to be increasingly...
....permissive to far right ideas,
SunSeeker
(51,728 posts)2. K&R
okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)3. Yes and the far right money has spent a fortune buying media outlets & spin doctors to convince
them that it's the left causing their economic problems. Seriously, NewsMax, FoxNews, Rush who is paid to say good things about people in his radio show, Wall Street Journal, Rupert Murdoch, people have no idea what the problem is. I think the conservative and moderate republicans have stockholm syndrome.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)4. Agree. The inflammatory rhetoric coming from all of the above
plus teabagger congressmen encourages all this. They all have a profound disrespect for government.
pampango
(24,692 posts)5. According to the study "nationalism" is the one common thread uniting far-right groups.
The study itself is here: http://www.ctc.usma.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ChallengersFromtheSidelines.pdf
The racist movement is comprised of white supremacy groups such as the KKK, neoNazi groups such as the National Alliance and Skinheads groups such as the Hammerskin Nation. The groups comprising this movement are interested in preserving or restoring what they perceive as the appropriate and natural racial and cultural hierarchy, by enforcing social and political control over non-Aryans/nonwhites such as African Americans, Jews, and various immigrant communities. Therefore, their ideological foundations are based mainly on ideas of racism, segregation, xenophobia, and nativism (rejection of foreign norms and practices).
The antifederalist rationale is multifaceted, and includes the beliefs that the American political system and its proxies were hijacked by external forces interested in promoting a New World Order (NWO) in which the United States will be absorbed into the United Nations or another version of global government.
Lastly, the fundamentalist stream, which includes mainly Christian Identity groups such as the Aryan Nations, fuse religious fundamentalism with traditional white supremacy and racial tendencies, thus promoting ideas of nativism, exclusionism, and racial superiority through a unique interpretation of religious texts that focuses on division of humanity according to primordial attributes. More specifically, these groups maintain that a correct interpretation of the holy texts reveals that it is not the people of Israel but the Anglo-Saxons who are the chosen people and therefore assert their natural superior status.
If there is one ideological doctrine about which there is almost full consensus regarding its importance for understanding the far-right worldview, it is that of nationalism. Historically, the literature on nationalism has taken diverse directions and is extremely rich, but in its varying guises it usually refers to the association between ethnic, cultural and/or linguistic identity and political expression, or more simply put, the convergence of a cultural framework with a political entity.
In the context of the far-right worldview, nationalism takes an extreme form of full convergence between one polity or territory and one ethnic or national collective. Two elements are required for the fulfillment of this version of the nationalist doctrine. The first is that of internal homogenization, i.e., the aspiration that all residents or citizens of the polity will share the same national origin and ethnic characteristics. The second is the element of external exclusiveness, the aspiration that all individuals belonging to a specific national or ethnic group will reside in the homeland.
Nationalism, racism, xenophobia and nativism all seem to be common threads with the violent far-right. Not surprising since they all play into the "US (internal homogenization) vs THEM (external exclusiveness)" ideology that motivates the far-right.