Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 04:38 AM Feb 2013

The Ten Most Regressive State and Local Tax Systems

Ten states — Washington, Florida, South Dakota, Illinois, Texas, Tennessee, Arizona, Pennsylvania,
Indiana, and Alabama— are particularly regressive. These “Terrible Ten” states ask their poorest residents
— those in the bottom 20 percent of the income scale — to pay up to six times as much of their income in
taxes as they ask the wealthy to pay. Middle-income families in these states pay up to three times as high a
share of their income as the wealthiest families

• Four of the ten states do not levy a personal income tax— Florida, South Dakota, Texas, and
Washington. An additional state, Tennessee, only applies its personal income tax to interest and dividend
income.
• Five states do levy personal income taxes, but have structured them in a way that makes them much less
progressive than in other states. Pennsylvania , Illinois and Indiana use a flat rate which taxes the income
of the wealthiest family at the same marginal rate as the poorest wage earner. Arizona and Alabama have
a graduated rate structure, however there is little difference between the bottom marginal rate and top
marginal rate









• The main finding of this report is that virtually every state’s tax system is fundamentally unfair, taking a
much greater share of income from middle- and low-income families than from wealthy families. The
absence of a graduated personal income tax and the over reliance on consumption taxes
exacerbate this problem in many states.






The least regressive states are Vermont, Delaware, DC, New York and Oregon.



http://www.itep.org/pdf/whopaysreport.pdf
http://wonkette.com/499222/persecuted-job-creators-not-being-taxed-to-death-by-states-dont-worry#more-499222
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Ten Most Regressive State and Local Tax Systems (Original Post) octoberlib Feb 2013 OP
"No income tax" is the main reason my dad wanted to retire Warpy Feb 2013 #1
They're thinking about doing this in NC too. octoberlib Feb 2013 #2

Warpy

(111,292 posts)
1. "No income tax" is the main reason my dad wanted to retire
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 04:56 AM
Feb 2013

in Florida. No amount of number crunching could convince him he was paying through the nose there, probably more than if a progressive income tax had been instituted and all the regressive taxes reduced sharply. Then they added a stinker called an "intangibles tax" that hit investment income hard and I think he began to regret it a bit.

The lege under Jebbie managed to first reduce and then eliminate the hated intangibles tax, so once again he thought Florida was a good deal, even though it wasn't.

Rich men love regressive taxes. Your chart tells us why.

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
2. They're thinking about doing this in NC too.
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 05:19 AM
Feb 2013

It's a platform of the Koch bros. Americans for Prosperity, Libertarian, Tea Party crap. Most people in this state will probably be in favor of it because all they'll hear is 'no income taxes'. The state Dem party is pushing back though and trying to educate people.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Ten Most Regressive S...