Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 07:43 AM Feb 2013

Republican Montana state rep wants ‘corporal punishment’ for offenders

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/31/republican-montana-state-rep-wants-corporal-punishment-for-offenders/



Republican Montana state rep wants ‘corporal punishment’ for offenders
By David Ferguson
Thursday, January 31, 2013 13:44 EST

A Montana Republican state lawmaker wants to give criminals the option of choosing “corporal punishment in lieu of incarceration.” According to Think Progress, the legislation is being proposed by Rep. Jerry O’Neil and would apply not just to misdemeanor crimes, but to some felonies as well.

The law states that “(f)or purposes of this section, ‘corporal punishment’ means the infliction of physical pain on a defendant to carry out the sentence negotiated between the judge and the defendant.” The law states that the exact nature of that pain shall be “commensurate with the severity, nature, and degree of the harm caused by the offender.”

The proposed law stipulates that the punishment shall be carried out by local sheriffs if the defendant is avoiding jail time or corrections personnel if the defendant is choosing the option to stay out of state prison.

Whether this means something like a firm spanking or, perhaps, something as harsh as waterboarding or a public flogging is not stated in the legislation. John S. Adams of the Great Falls Tribune wrote on his blog The Lowdown, “Republican leadership has been doing its best to tamp down any potential bills the other side might use to embarrass the GOP as they work to craft a budget. This one apparently didn’t get tamped.”


7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

JHB

(37,161 posts)
3. Would this mean police are required to use kid gloves on everyone...
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 07:52 AM
Feb 2013

...because any rough treatment would cause a reduced sentence for "pain already served"?

And would the police be liable for the equivalent of false imprisonment for any pain inflicted on someone found not guilty or was not even charged?

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
7. You have a point.
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 08:07 AM
Feb 2013

This woman was beaten by police for using a cell phone while driving.



Perhaps a manual prescribing the amount of beating required of each infraction of the law could be produced to help guide "authorities" in their quest to make society safer?
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
6. but then how would we maintain the propaganda offensive against iran? if we're flogging people
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 07:59 AM
Feb 2013

and cutting off their hands, how can we bitch when other countries do?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republican Montana state ...